Abstract
This chapter weighs the importance, or the fundamentality, of the body in Patočka’s phenomenology. After summarizing Patočka’s interpretation of Husserl’s approach to the body, I turn to the mind-body problem as discussed by Patočka in his war manuscripts: analogically to the approach presented in his late lectures on Husserl, also there Patočka takes for granted that “what takes place in the body through the body belongs to my I.” But, in his late studies, Patočka presupposes neither the methodological priority of the I nor the gap between the I and the world to be bridged by the body. Critically assessing Barbaras’ and Novotný’s interpretations of Patočka’s late concept of the body, and taking into account the concept of the movement of existence, I emphasize that not all activities of the human being should be conceived of as being centred around and performed by the body, and hence that one can meaningfully distinguish between the body and “the soul.” The body bestows the I with its life, thus making possible its being, but this being transcends the body. Simultaneously, however, the body eludes existence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In other texts, Patočka presents a much more complex picture of Descartes’ ideas on the body. Cf. esp. Patočka (2016c: 186–188).
- 2.
Of course, this duality of distancing and uniting is nothing new in Patočka’s thought. Cf. above, Chap. 6.
- 3.
Although there are, of course, many processes in the body of which the I has no idea, these processes do not take place through the body as my body. It does not mean, of course, that the I is the principle of these processes. I will come back to this problem.
- 4.
More precisely: “I do not intend the movement of my hand: what I will is to write a few words on the board, I will to reach an apple” (Patočka 1998: 45).
- 5.
Through the first movement “we are individuals, separated out of the whole of nature, but at the same time nature permeates us internally, determines us through internally given needs which rule us” (Patočka 1998: 160). A concise explication of the first movement in the context pursued here is offered by Novotný 2011: 63–67.
- 6.
In fact, it is Patočka himself who says: “What makes it possible for us to perceive is the transformation of nature into something that is already more than nature – life is the middle term, life is capable of going along with the other” (Patočka 1998: 134). The problem is, however, that he sharply differentiates between the process of physis and the movement of existence without explicating how to think life as standing “in the middle.” His reflections on the body do call for phenomenology of life but do not offer it.
References
Barbaras, Renaud. 2007. Le mouvement de l’existence. Études sur la phénoménologie de Jan Patočka. Chatou: Éditions de la Transparence.
Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and Andre Schuwer. Dolbrecht: Kluwer.
Novotný, Karel. 2011. Subjektivní pohyb těla a svět. In Fenomenologie tělesnosti (Filosofický časopis. Suppl.), ed. Petr Urban, 47–68. Praha: Filosofia.
Patočka, Jan. 1996. An Introduction to Husserl’s Phenomenology. Trans. Erazim Kohák, ed. James Dodd. Chicago: Open Court.
———. 1998. Body, Community, Language, World. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.
———. 2014a. Svět a předmětnost. In Fenomenologické spisy III/1, ed. Ivan Chvatík, Jan Frei, and Jan Puc, 51–67. Praha: Oikúmené.
———. 2014b. Studie k pojmu světa. In Fenomenologické spisy III/1, ed. Ivan Chvatík, Jan Frei, and Jan Puc, 70–173. Praha: Oikúmené.
———. 2016a. Prostor a jeho problematika. In Fenomenologické spisy III/2, ed. Ivan Chvatík, Jan Frei, and Jan Puc, 11–71. Praha: Oikúmené.
———. 2016b. Fenomenologie a metafyzika pohybu. In Fenomenologické spisy III/2, ed. Ivan Chvatík, Jan Frei, and Jan Puc, 143–158. Praha: Oikúmené.
———. 2016c. Fenomenologie vlastního těla. In Fenomenologické spisy III/2, ed. Ivan Chvatík, Jan Frei, and Jan Puc, 173–188. Praha: Oikúmené.
———. 2016d. Koncept přednášky o tělesnosti. In Fenomenologické spisy III/2, ed. Ivan Chvatík, Jan Frei, and Jan Puc, 189–251. Praha: Oikúmené.
———. 2016e. Phänomenologie und Metaphysik der Bewegung. In Fenomenologické spisy III/2, ed. Ivan Chvatík, Jan Frei, and Jan Puc, 714–731. Praha: Oikúmené.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ritter, M. (2019). (Dis)Appropriating (the) Body. In: Into the World: The Movement of Patočka's Phenomenology. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 104. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23657-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23657-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23656-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23657-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)