Abstract
Title IX investigations have been controversial and much of the scrutiny has been on legal dimensions such as thresholds of proof or cross-examining witnesses. However, another important issue is the accurate and unbiased processing of the information. This chapter discusses a well-known heuristic error known as confirmation bias and presents a methodology for potentially controlling for this bias in Title IX investigations. A hypothesis testing model in which competing hypotheses are developed and disconfirming or confirming information is delineated antecedently is presented. This chapter also discussed the difficulty of making final judgments which is also complicated by the lack of development of clear markers of sexual misconduct or of false allegations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bradley, A. R., & Wood, J. M. (1996). How do children tell? The disclosure process in child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 881–891.
Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2014). Post-traumatic growth. New York: Psychology Press.
Cummings, C. & O’Donohue, W. (2019). A forensic interview protocol for adult sexual assault: Content validity and consumer acceptability. Article submitted for publication.
Engle, J., & O’Donohue, W. (2012). Pathways to false allegations of sexual assault. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12(2), 97–123.
Harper, S., Maskaly, J., Kirkner, A., & Lorenz, K. (2017). Enhancing Title IX due process standards in campus sexual assault adjudication: Considering the roles of distributive, procedural, and restorative justice. Journal of School Violence, 16, 302–316.
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170.
McNally, R. (2003). Remembering trauma. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
O’Donohue, W. T., Snipes, C., & Soto, C. (2015). A case study of the overselling of psychotherapy: ACT interventions for diabetes management. Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 46(1), 15–25.
Poletiek, F. H. (2015). Hypothesis testing behavior. New York: Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1978). The web of belief. New York: McGraw Hill.
Richards, T. N. (2019). No evidence of “Weaponized Title IX” here: An empirical assessment of sexual misconduct reporting, case processing, and outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 43(2), 180–192.
Sagan, C. (2011). The demon haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Paw Print.
Triplett, M. R. (2012). Sexual assault on college campuses: Seeking the appropriate balance between due process and victim protection. Duke Law Journal, 62(2), 487–527.
Urbach, R. (1987). Francis Bacon’s philosophy of science. London: Open Court.
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Donohue, W.T. (2019). Decision Making in Title IX Investigations: A Hypothesis Testing Approach to Overcome Cognitive Bias. In: O’Donohue, W.T., Schewe, P.A. (eds) Handbook of Sexual Assault and Sexual Assault Prevention. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23645-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23645-8_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23644-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23645-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)