Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Management of Pancreatico-Biliary Disease: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Flexible Endoscopy

  • 672 Accesses

Abstract

Biliary stone disease, pancreaticobiliary inflammation, pancreaticobiliary neoplasia, and incidental radiographic findings are among the most common indications for performing EUS. EUS routinely is used to investigate laboratory abnormalities and lesions identified on cross-sectional imaging and provides both additional diagnostic and therapeutic value, sparing some patients operative intervention. Clinical presentation, physical findings, biochemical analyses, TUS, CT, MRI, and ERCP all play important roles in the diagnosis and treatment of CBDS and other pancreaticobiliary disorders. None, however, is as effective as EUS for diagnosis of the various benign and malignant conditions impacting the biliary tree and pancreas.

EUS is a superior diagnostic tool for identifying CBDS and other biliopancreatic pathology. Using EUS to direct the application of ERCP renders the latter solely a therapeutic procedure, which limits the risks and costs of unnecessary interventions. The development of adjunctive devices, like lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS), has fueled the development of novel EUS-based approaches to CBDS in patients with surgically altered anatomy, drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and walled off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), and extra-anatomic decompression of the obstructed biliary tree. These procedures, now becoming routine, benefit patients through increasingly less invasive therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S, Gelsi E, Vanbiervliet G, Tran A, et al. Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(1):241–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aljebreen A, Azzam N, Eloubeidi MA. Prospective study of endoscopic ultrasound performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(5):741–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petrov MS, Savides TJ. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):967–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ang TL, Teo EK, Fock KM. Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(8):1163–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee YT, Chan FKL, Leung WK, Chan HLY, Wu JCY, Yung MY, et al. Comparison of EUS and ERCP in the investigation with suspected biliary obstruction caused by choledocholithiasis: a randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(4):660–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Turner BG, Cizginer S, Agarwal D, Yang J, Pitman MB, Brugge WR. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(1):91–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borie F, Fingerhut A, Millat B. Acute biliary pancreatitis, endoscopy, and laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(8):1175–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Videhult P, Sandblom G, Rudberg C, Rasmussen IC. Are liver function tests, pancreatitis and cholecystitis predictors of common bile duct stones? Results of a prospective, population-based, cohort study of 1171 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(8):519–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheen AJ, Asthana S, Al-Mukhtar A, Attia M, Toogood GJ. Preoperative determinants of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(11):1715–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Einstein DM, Lapin SA, Ralls PW, Halls JM. The insensitivity of sonography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142:725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nebiker CA, Baierlein SA, Beck S, von Flue M, Ackermann C, Peterli R. Is routine MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) justified prior to cholecystectomy? Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2009;394(6):1005–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Almadi M, Barkun JS, Barkun AN. Management of suspected stones in the common bile duct. CMAJ. 2012;184(8):884–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakai Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Yukisawa S, Tsuchiya S, Sugiyama H, Miyakawa K, et al. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for clinically suspicious spontaneous passage of bile duct stones. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(5):736–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Desai R, Shokouhi BN. Common bile duct stones – their presentation, diagnosis and management. Indian J Surg. 2009;71(5):229–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Paterson-Brown S, Nixon SJ. Role of liver function tests in predicting common bile duct stones in acute calculous cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2005;92(10):1241–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang M-H, Chen T-H, Wang S-E, Tsai Y-F, Su C-H, Wu C-W, et al. Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1620–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rickes S, Treiber G, Monkemuller K, Peitz U, Csepregi A, Kahl S, et al. Impact of the operator’s experience on value of high-resolution transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparison using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the gold standard. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41(7):838–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grönroos JM, Haapamäki MM, Gullichsen R. Effect of the diameter of the common bile duct on the incidence of bile duct stones in patients with recurrent attacks of right epigastric pain after cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(10):767–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Jiffry BO, Elfateh A, Chundrigar T, Othman B, Almalki O, Rayza F, et al. Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(35):5877–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tseng CW, Chen CC, Chen TS, Chang FY, Lin HC, Lee SD. Can computed tomography with coronal reconstruction improve the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(10):1586–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JK, Kim TK, Byun JH, Kim AY, Ha HK, Kim PN, et al. Diagnosis of intrahepatic and common duct stones: combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced helical CT in 1090 patients. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31(4):425–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, Vanbeckevoort D, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg. 2003;90(1):42–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boraschi P, Gigoni R, Braccini G, Lamacchia M, Rossi M, Falaschi F. Detection of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Radiol. 2002;43(6):593–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Raval B, Kramer L. Advances in the imaging of common duct stones using magnetic resonance cholangiography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopic ultrasonography. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2000;7(4):232–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stiris MG, Tennøe B, Aadland E, Lunde OC. MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiol. 2000;41(3):269–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kejriwal R, Liang J, Andrewson G, Hill A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the common bile duct to exclude choledocholithiasis. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(8):619–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mendler MH, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, Chaumerliac P, Cessot F, Le Sidaner A, et al. Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93(12):2482–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma SK, Larson KA, Adler Z, Goldfarb MA. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of suspected choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(6):868–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kubota Y, Takaoka M, Yamamoto S, Shibatani N, Shimatani M, Takamido S, et al. Diagnosis of common bile duct calculi with intraductal ultrasonography during endoscopic biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17(6):708–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(1):4–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mukai S, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T, Tanaka R, Tonozuka R. EUS-guided intrahepatic bile duct stone extraction via choledochoduodenostomy created by a lumen-apposing metal stent. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(4):832–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Overby DW, Richardson W, Fanelli R. Choledocholithiasis after gastric bypass: a growing problem. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(4):652–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Menon S. EUS in biliary stone disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(4):810; author reply -1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsuchiya T, Itoi T, Sofuni A, Tonozuka R, Mukai S. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided rendezvous technique. Dig Endosc. 2016;28 Suppl 1:96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tyberg A, Desai AP, Kumta NA, Brown E, Gaidhane M, Sharaiha RZ, et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP: a novel algorithm individualized based on patient anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(6):941–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tyberg A, Nieto J, Salgado S, Weaver K, Kedia P, Sharaiha RZ, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or EUS: mid-term analysis of an emerging procedure. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(2):185–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Siripun A, Sripongpun P, Ovartlarnporn B. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary intervention in patients with surgically altered anatomy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(3):283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Baron TH, Topazian MD. Endoscopic transduodenal drainage of the gallbladder: implications for endoluminal treatment of gallbladder disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(4):735–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baron TH, Grimm IS, Swanstrom LL. Interventional approaches to gallbladder disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(4):357–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Irani S, Baron TH, Grimm IS, Khashab MA. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(6):1110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Law R, Grimm IS, Stavas JM, Baron TH. Conversion of percutaneous cholecystostomy to internal transmural gallbladder drainage using an endoscopic ultrasound-guided, lumen-apposing metal stent. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(3):476–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER, Wilcox CM. Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(6):1102–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(3):583–90.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Siddiqui AA, Kowalski TE, Loren DE, Khalid A, Soomro A, Mazhar SM, et al. Fully covered self-expanding metal stents versus lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent versus plastic stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: clinical outcomes and success. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(4):758–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sharaiha RZ, Tyberg A, Khashab MA, Kumta NA, Karia K, Nieto J, et al. Endoscopic therapy with lumen-apposing metal stents is safe and effective for patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(12):1797–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fanelli RD, Andrew BD. Making the diagnosis: surgery, a rational approach to the patient with suspected CBD stones. In: Hazey JW, Conwell DL, Guy GE, editors. Management of common bile duct stones: an interdisciplinary textbook. Cham: Springer International Publishing Company; 2016. p. 37–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Guthrie Clinic, Department of Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Sayre, PA, USA

    Robert D. Fanelli

  2. The Ohio State University College of Medicine, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Columbus, OH, USA

    Stephanie M. Fanelli

  3. The Guthrie Clinic, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Sayre, PA, USA

    Josephine A. Fanelli

Authors
  1. Robert D. Fanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephanie M. Fanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Josephine A. Fanelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Peter Nau

  2. Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Cen, Hershey, PA, USA

    Eric M. Pauli

  3. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Bryan J. Sandler

  4. Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA

    Thadeus L. Trus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fanelli, R.D., Fanelli, S.M., Fanelli, J.A. (2020). Management of Pancreatico-Biliary Disease: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS). In: Nau, P., Pauli, E., Sandler, B., Trus, T. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Flexible Endoscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23590-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23590-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23589-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23590-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation