Abstract
What makes urban projects urban and what does it take to urbanise deliberately? This is a highly pertinent question in the Flemish context, where the regional design agenda is driven by the collective challenge to move away from the notoriously anti-urban legacy of sprawl that has shaped the Flemish Region. The argument of this chapter seeks to answer the question: what does it mean to design for the urban at the regional scale? In order to answer this question, this chapter attempts to gather clues from design research laboratories and collective efforts to deal with regional design in Flanders and Brussels. This analysis produces an inverse way of looking at the relationship between design and governance rescaling within the regional context. Designing for the urban involves articulating the various scales at which urbanisation processes play out, in order to define concrete settings within which variously scaled dynamics can be made the object of concrete and locally supported actions. It also means identifying local actions that enable communities to convert the collective burden of urbanisation into collectively shared opportunities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alkemade F, Declerck J, Van Broeck L (2017) The missing link. Online: https://iabr.nl/en/curator/curator-statement_iabr2018-2020. Last consulted 15 May 2018
AWB (2016) A good city has industry. Online: http://www.architectureworkroom.eu/documents/ABXL_Bozar_GUIDE_ENG_DEF_webres.pdf. Last consulted 15 May 2018
AWB (2017) Regionale Oproep IABR—OVK. Online: https://iabr.nl/en/projectatelier/ovk_regionaleoproep. Last consulted 15 May 2018
Broadbent G (1973) Design in architecture: architecture and the human sciences. Wiley, London
Broes T, Dehaene M (2017) Mastering the urbanisation process: the urban questions of engineer August Mennes in the Antwerp agglomeration. Plann Perspect 32(4):503–531
Byebyepetiteceinture (2018). Online: http://byebye.petiteceinture.be/. Last consulted 15 May 2018
Castells M (1972) La question urbaine. Paris, François Maspero
Corrijn E (2012) Breuklijnen in de Vlaamse stedelijkheid. In: Holemans D (ed) Mensen maken de Stad. Antwerpen, Epo, pp 98–116
Cross N (1982) Designerly ways of knowing. Des Stud 3(4):221–227
Dehaene M (2013) Gardening in the urban field. A&S/Books, Gent
Dehaene M (2015) Stedenbouw als verstedelijkingskunde. In: Schram A, Colenbrander B, Doevendans K, De Meulder B (eds) Stadsperspectieven: Europese Tradities in de stedenbouw. Nijmegen, Vantilt, pp 296–312
Dejemeppe P, Périlleux B (2012) Brussel 2040. Drie visies voor een metropool, Brussel: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest
De Meulder B, Schreurs J, Cock A, Notteboom B (1999) Patching up the Belgian urban landscape. OASE 52:78–113
De Block G, Polasky J (2011) Light railways and the rural-urban continuum: technology, space and society in late nineteenth-century Belgium. J Hist Geogr 37(3):312–328
Degros A (2014) Bruxels, [Re]discovering its space. Public spaces in the Sustainable Neighbourhood Contracts, Brussels: Brussels Capital Region
De Solà-Morales M (1987) Another modern tradition Urbanismo-Revista 5:21–27
Grosjean B (2010) Urbanisation sans Urbanisme. Une histoire de la «ville diffuse». Mardaga, Bruxelles
Ingold T (2011) The Perception of the environment. Routledge, London/New York
Kuhk A, Dehaene M, Dumont M, Schreurs J (2016) Toekomstverkenning als collectief leren. Ruimte Vlaanderen, Brussels. Online: https://www.ruimtelijkeordening.be/Portals/108/docs/Onderzoek/Steunpunt_Ruimte_3_Toekomst_3.2.pdf
Lindblom CE (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88
Merrifield A (2014) The new urban question. Pluto Press, London
Oosterlynck S et al (eds) (2010) Strategic spatial projects: catalysts for change. Routledge, London
Phelps NA, Wood AM, Valler DC (2010) A postsuburban world? An outline of a research agenda. Environ Plann A Econ Space 42(2):366–383
Remy J (1966) La ville, phénomène économique. Vie Ouvrière, Brussels
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169
Rowe P (1987) Design thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Saunders P (1984) Social theory and the urban question. Routledge, London
Schön DA (1982) Some of what a planner knows: a case study of knowing-in-practice. J Am Plann Assoc 48(3):351–364
Tsing A (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Sternberg E (2000) An integrative theory of urban design. J Am Plann Assoc 66(3):265–278
Van Meeteren M, Boussauw K, Derudder B, Witlox F (2016) Flemish diamond or ABC axis? The spatial structure of the Belgian metropolitan area. Eur Plan Stud 24(5):974–995
Verhaert I, Vanobbergen T, Dehaene M et al (2014) Lab XX: opting for the twentieth-century belt. City of Antwerp, Antwerp
Vervloesem E, De Meulder B, Loeckx A (eds) (2012) Urban renewal in Flanders 2002–2011. A particular practice in Europe. ASP Editions, Brussels
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dehaene, M. (2020). Belgian Design Laboratories of Post-sprawl Urbanisation. In: Lingua, V., Balz, V. (eds) Shaping Regional Futures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23573-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23573-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23572-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23573-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)