Skip to main content

Belgian Design Laboratories of Post-sprawl Urbanisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 675 Accesses

Abstract

What makes urban projects urban and what does it take to urbanise deliberately? This is a highly pertinent question in the Flemish context, where the regional design agenda is driven by the collective challenge to move away from the notoriously anti-urban legacy of sprawl that has shaped the Flemish Region. The argument of this chapter seeks to answer the question: what does it mean to design for the urban at the regional scale? In order to answer this question, this chapter attempts to gather clues from design research laboratories and collective efforts to deal with regional design in Flanders and Brussels. This analysis produces an inverse way of looking at the relationship between design and governance rescaling within the regional context. Designing for the urban involves articulating the various scales at which urbanisation processes play out, in order to define concrete settings within which variously scaled dynamics can be made the object of concrete and locally supported actions. It also means identifying local actions that enable communities to convert the collective burden of urbanisation into collectively shared opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ruimtelijkeordening.be/SteunpuntenBeleidsrelevantOnderzoek/SteunpuntRuimte/Toekomstverkenningen.

References

  • Alkemade F, Declerck J, Van Broeck L (2017) The missing link. Online: https://iabr.nl/en/curator/curator-statement_iabr2018-2020. Last consulted 15 May 2018

  • AWB (2016) A good city has industry. Online: http://www.architectureworkroom.eu/documents/ABXL_Bozar_GUIDE_ENG_DEF_webres.pdf. Last consulted 15 May 2018

  • AWB (2017) Regionale Oproep IABR—OVK. Online: https://iabr.nl/en/projectatelier/ovk_regionaleoproep. Last consulted 15 May 2018

  • Broadbent G (1973) Design in architecture: architecture and the human sciences. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Broes T, Dehaene M (2017) Mastering the urbanisation process: the urban questions of engineer August Mennes in the Antwerp agglomeration. Plann Perspect 32(4):503–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byebyepetiteceinture (2018). Online: http://byebye.petiteceinture.be/. Last consulted 15 May 2018

  • Castells M (1972) La question urbaine. Paris, François Maspero

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrijn E (2012) Breuklijnen in de Vlaamse stedelijkheid. In: Holemans D (ed) Mensen maken de Stad. Antwerpen, Epo, pp 98–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (1982) Designerly ways of knowing. Des Stud 3(4):221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene M (2013) Gardening in the urban field. A&S/Books, Gent

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene M (2015) Stedenbouw als verstedelijkingskunde. In: Schram A, Colenbrander B, Doevendans K, De Meulder B (eds) Stadsperspectieven: Europese Tradities in de stedenbouw. Nijmegen, Vantilt, pp 296–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejemeppe P, Périlleux B (2012) Brussel 2040. Drie visies voor een metropool, Brussel: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meulder B, Schreurs J, Cock A, Notteboom B (1999) Patching up the Belgian urban landscape. OASE 52:78–113

    Google Scholar 

  • De Block G, Polasky J (2011) Light railways and the rural-urban continuum: technology, space and society in late nineteenth-century Belgium. J Hist Geogr 37(3):312–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degros A (2014) Bruxels, [Re]discovering its space. Public spaces in the Sustainable Neighbourhood Contracts, Brussels: Brussels Capital Region

    Google Scholar 

  • De Solà-Morales M (1987) Another modern tradition Urbanismo-Revista 5:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean B (2010) Urbanisation sans Urbanisme. Une histoire de la «ville diffuse». Mardaga, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2011) The Perception of the environment. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhk A, Dehaene M, Dumont M, Schreurs J (2016) Toekomstverkenning als collectief leren. Ruimte Vlaanderen, Brussels. Online: https://www.ruimtelijkeordening.be/Portals/108/docs/Onderzoek/Steunpunt_Ruimte_3_Toekomst_3.2.pdf

  • Lindblom CE (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield A (2014) The new urban question. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlynck S et al (eds) (2010) Strategic spatial projects: catalysts for change. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps NA, Wood AM, Valler DC (2010) A postsuburban world? An outline of a research agenda. Environ Plann A Econ Space 42(2):366–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remy J (1966) La ville, phénomène économique. Vie Ouvrière, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe P (1987) Design thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders P (1984) Social theory and the urban question. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1982) Some of what a planner knows: a case study of knowing-in-practice. J Am Plann Assoc 48(3):351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing A (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: on the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg E (2000) An integrative theory of urban design. J Am Plann Assoc 66(3):265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Meeteren M, Boussauw K, Derudder B, Witlox F (2016) Flemish diamond or ABC axis? The spatial structure of the Belgian metropolitan area. Eur Plan Stud 24(5):974–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaert I, Vanobbergen T, Dehaene M et al (2014) Lab XX: opting for the twentieth-century belt. City of Antwerp, Antwerp

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervloesem E, De Meulder B, Loeckx A (eds) (2012) Urban renewal in Flanders 2002–2011. A particular practice in Europe. ASP Editions, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michiel Dehaene .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dehaene, M. (2020). Belgian Design Laboratories of Post-sprawl Urbanisation. In: Lingua, V., Balz, V. (eds) Shaping Regional Futures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23573-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics