Advertisement

Human Factors in New Personal Learning Ecosystems: Challenges, Ethical Issues, and Opportunities

  • Helene FournierEmail author
  • Heather Molyneaux
  • Rita Kop
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1034)

Abstract

This paper highlights over a decade of research on emerging technologies and learning innovation by the National Research Council, starting in 2008 with Personal Learning Environments (PLEs), connectivist-type MOOCs (cMOOCs) and more recently, new learning ecosystems. Late breaking research on human factors involved in critical learning on an open network will highlight participants’ experiences in a recent cMOOC on distributed learning technologies - E-Learning 3.0. Human factors research is essential in identifying the types of support structures needed to create a place or community where people feel comfortable, trusted, and valued, as part of critical learning on an open network. Gaps and limitations in current research and development efforts in the area of new learning ecosystems are addressed as well as future areas of research worth exploring.

Keywords

Personal Learning Environments PLEs cMOOCs Connectivism Learning ecosystems Human factors 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge Stephen Downes, E-Learning 3.0 course facilitator. His philosophy on open and accessible learning has made this research possible and has contributed to over a decade of research and development on Personal Learning Environments and MOOCs in particular.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Harmelen, M.: Personal learning environments (2006). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3a80/0f41a3431cd05b37e882c34dc434aa27bbf3.pdf
  2. 2.
    Wilson, S.: Architecture of virtual spaces & the future of VLEs (2005). https://www.slideserve.com/Sophia/architecture-of-virtual-spaces-the-future-of-vles
  3. 3.
    Downes, S.: Design elements in a personal learning environment. Half an hour blog (2015). https://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2015/03/design-elements-in-personal-learning.html
  4. 4.
    Weller, M.A.: Pedagogy of abundance. Span. J. Pedagogy 249, 223–236 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downes, S.: What connectivism is [Web log post] (2007). http://halfanhour.blogspot.ca/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.htm
  6. 6.
    Siemens, G.: What is the theory that underpins our moocs? (2012). http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-the-theory-that-underpins-our-moocs/
  7. 7.
    Bell, F.: Connectivism: its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 12(3), 98–118 (2011). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/902/1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniel, J.: Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. J. Interact. Media Educ. 2012(3), (2012). https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Downes, S.: The MOOC of one (2014). https://www.slideshare.net/Downes/2014-03-10-valencia
  11. 11.
    Kop, R., Carroll, F.: Cloud computing and creativity: Learning on a massive open online course. EURODL, 1–11 (2011). http://www.eurodl.org/?p=special&sp=articles&article=457
  12. 12.
    Kop, R.: The design and development of a personal learning environment: researching the learning experience. In: Proceedings of the European Distance and E-learning Network Annual Conference 2010, 9–12 June, Valencia, Spain (2010). https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/accepted/?id=0728bc9b-1907-49c1-90bd-0f7ea87a0cad
  13. 13.
    Mackness, J., Waite, M., Roberts, G., Lovegrove, E.: Learning in small, task-oriented, connectivist MOOC: pedagogical issues and implications for higher education. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 14(4) (2013). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1548/2687
  14. 14.
    Downes, S.: About gRSShopper (2018). https://grsshopper.downes.ca/about.htm
  15. 15.
    Downes, S.: Approaching E-Learning 3.0 (2018). https://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2018/09/approaching-e-learning-30.html
  16. 16.
    De Laat, M.: Networked learning. Doctoral thesis (2006). https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/20358/1/Maarten_De_Laat_Networked_Learning_2006.pdf
  17. 17.
    Miller, T., Bell, L.: Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’ consent. In: Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J., Miller, T. (eds.) Ethics in Qualitative Research, pp. 53–69. Seven Oakes, London and Sage Publications, New Delhi (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Wel, L., Royakkers, L.: Ethical issues in web data mining. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6, 129–140 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for Big Data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15(5), 662–679 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prinsloo, P., Slade, S.: Ethics and Learning Analytics: Charting the (Un)Charted, Handbook of Learning Analytics, 1st edn., Chapter 4, pp. 49–57 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Council CanadaMonctonCanada
  2. 2.National Research Council CanadaFrederictonCanada
  3. 3.Yorkville UniversityFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations