Internet Use and Happiness: An Updated Review of Literature

  • Richard H. HallEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1034)


The purpose of this research is to review the literation on the relationship between internet use and happiness, updating a previous review [1], and building upon a series of longitudinal studies following this initial review [2, 3, 4]. Reasons for studying happiness, and happiness definitions and measurement are discussed. This is followed by a discussion of early research which found a negative relationship between internet use and happiness, followed by studies indicating a more positive relationship, supporting a “stimulation hypothesis” that poses that the internet can act to facilitate face-to-face interactions. More recent research has focused on social networking. With some important exceptions, these most recent studies continue to find that internet use is positively related to happiness, while identifying a number of important mediating and moderating variables, such as experience with the internet and social networking; wealth; health; number of “friends”; the nature of interactions; extroversion, and the ways in which users represent themselves online.


Internet Happiness 


  1. 1.
    Hall, R.H., Banaszek, A.: The internet, happiness, and social interaction: a review of literature. In: Nah, F.F.-H. (ed.) HCIB 2014. LNCS, vol. 8527, pp. 166–174. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hall, R.H.: Internet use and happiness. In: Nah, F.F.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9751, pp. 37–45. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hall, R.H.: Internet use and happiness: a longitudinal analysis. In: Nah, F.F.-H., Tan, C.-H. (eds.) HCIBGO 2017. LNCS, vol. 10294, pp. 213–222. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall, R.H.: Internet use and happiness: a replication and extension. In: Nah, F.F.-H., Xiao, B.S. (eds.) HCIBGO 2018. LNCS, vol. 10923, pp. 465–474. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diener, E., et al.: New measures of well-being. In: Diener, E. (ed.) Assessing well Being, vol. 39, pp. 247–266. Springer, Dordrecht (2009). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., Diener, E.: The benifits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success. Psychol. Bull. 6, 803–855 (2005). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veenhoven, R.J.: Healthy happiness: effects of happiness on physical health and the consequences for preventive health care. J. Happiness Stud. 9, 449–469 (2008). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diener, E.: Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am. Psychol. 55, 34–43 (2000). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myers, D.G.: The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. Am. Psychol. 55, 56–67 (2000). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freedman, J.: Happy People: What Happiness Is, Who Has It, and Why?. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Magnus, K, Diener, E.: A longitudinal analysis of personality, life events, and subjective well-being. Paper Presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lyubomirsky, S., Ross, L.: Hedonic consequences of social comparison: a contrast of happy and unhappy people. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 73, 1141–1157 (1997). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., Scherlis, W.: Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am. Psychol. 53, 1017–1031 (1998). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cummings, J., Butler, B., Kraut, R.: The quality of online social relationships. Commun. ACM 45, 103–108 (2002). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V.: Internet paradox revisited. J. Soc. Issues 58, 49–74 (2002). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J.: Online communication and adolescent well-being: testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12, 1169–1182 (2007). Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J., Schouten, A.P.: Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolecscents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9, 584–590 (2006). Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, J., Lee, J.R.: The Facebook paths to happiness: effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. CyberPsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 6, 359–364 (2011). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oh, J.H., Ozkaya, E., LaRose, R.: How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 69–78 (2014). Scholar
  20. 20.
    Penard, T., Poussing, N., Suire, R.: Does the internet make people happier? J. Socio-Econ. 46, 105–116 (2013). Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brooks, S.: Does personal social media usage affect efficiency and well-being? Comput. Hum. Behav. 46, 26–37 (2015). Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lissitsa, S., Chachasvili-Bolotin, S.: Life satisfaction in the internet age – changes in the past decade. Comput. Hum. Behav. 54, 107–206 (2016). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lonnqvist, J., Deters, F.G.: Facebook friends, subjective well-being, social support, and personality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 113–120 (2016). Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arampatzi, E., Burger, M.J., Novik, N.: Social network sites, individual social capital and happiness. J. Happiness Stud. 19, 99–122 (2018). Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castellacci, F., Tveito, V.: Internet use and well-being: a survey and a theoretical framework. Res. Policy 47, 308–325 (2018). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Missouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations