Guidelines on Context Integration: Developing Technological Solutions Communication for Education Professionals

  • Janaina C. AbibEmail author
  • Ednilson G. RossiEmail author
  • Rafael S. PenaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1034)


This article presents a project that arose from the need to design applications with natural interactions for professionals in the field of education, who have long working days and who mix personal and social activities together with professional activities. The project is based on the Design Process Model for Health Applications: Integrating Contexts and Adding Abilities (ICAH, in Portuguese), developed to guide and support the work of application developers for health professionals who care for patients in need of long-term care [1, 2, 3]. Its objective is to validate the guidelines of integration of contexts proposed in the ICAH Model applied to education professionals. To fulfill the proposed objective, the ICAH Model was used for the definition and collection of requirements for an application of communication and dissemination of information in the educational environment. The application was developed from research and observations of professionals who worked in a professional education institution during the year 2018. The application provides the disclosure of information related to extracurricular events and activities and official communications that are part of the Institution. The observations and feedbacks collected by the application gave us indications that the application was effectively adopted by education professionals. The content of the information that had favorable feedback was, in its majority, information that added extracurricular contents and social events of the Institution, evidencing the mix of contexts in the educational environment.


  1. 1.
    Abib, J.C.: Integração de Contextos e habilidades Pessoais, Sociais e Profissionais no Desenvolvimento de Soluções Tecnológicas para o Profissional da Saúde, 184 p. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 19 October 2016. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abib, J., Anacleto, J.: Guidelines to integrate professional, personal and social context in interaction design process: studies in healthcare environment. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9169, pp. 119–131. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abib, J.C., Anacleto, J.C.: Integrating contexts in healthcare: guidelines to help the designers at design process. In: 30th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2015), pp. 182–184, Salamanca (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abib, J.C., Anacleto, J.C.: Interaction design process for healthcare professionals: formalizing user’s contexts observations. In: XIV Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abib, J.C., Anacleto, J.C.: Modeling a design process to natural user interface and not ICT users. In: The 18th ACM Conference on CSCW: WORKSHOP Doing CSCW Research in Latin America: Differences, Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons Learned (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anacleto, J.C., Fels, S.: Lessons from ICT design of a healthcare worker-centered system for a chronic mental care hospital. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anacleto, J., Fels, S.: Adoption and appropriation: a design process from HCI research at a brazilian neurological hospital. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8118, pp. 356–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barbosa, S.D.J., Silva, B.S.: Interação Humano-Computador. Rio de Janeiro, Elsevier, série Editora Campus – SBC Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, p. 384 (2010). (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chase, J., Niyato, D., Chaisiri, S.: Bring-your-own-application (BYOA): optimal stochastic application migration in mobile cloud computing. In: IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Earley, S., Harmon, R., Lee, M.R., Mithas, S.: From BYOD to BYOA, phishing, and botnets. IT Prof. 16(5), 16–18 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    French, A.M., Guo, C., Shim, J.P.: Current status, issues, and future of bring your own device (BYOD). Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 35, 191–197 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hix, D., Hartson, H.R.: Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability through Product and Process, p. 416. Wiley, New York (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, Jr., J.R., Crossler, R.E.: Implications of monitoring mechanisms on bring your own device (BYOD) adoption. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Institute of São PauloAraraquara, São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations