Differences in Customers’ Interactions with Expert/Novice Salesclerks in a Bespoke Tailoring Situation: A Case Study on the Utterances of Salesclerks

  • Masashi SugimotoEmail author
  • Yoichi Yamazaki
  • Fang Zhang
  • Saki Miyai
  • Kodai Obata
  • Michiya Yamamoto
  • Noriko Nagata
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1034)


When we make decisions, we do not always decide by ourselves, but sometimes rely on recommendation systems. Previous recommendation systems focused on the accuracy of the recommendation. More recently, human-centered recommendation systems have garnered attention. The human-centered recommendation is especially important in a context wherein mass customization lets users personalize what they buy. However, how people tackle a vast amount of decision-making in the context of personalization has not yet been revealed. In this research, we focused on bespoke tailoring, which relies on salesclerks to help customers acquire what they want. We investigated the ways that customers interact with human recommenders (salesclerks). The results showed that expert salesclerks limited the number of options which customers have at a time, and that they reassured the customers about the suitability of their choices after they made their decisions. These results indicate that qualified recommenders in bespoke tailoring help customers by avoiding choice overload and evoking the customers’ positive emotions. These findings are especially helpful for a recommendation system in a situation in which personalization can lead to the realization of customer needs and wants.


Recommendation system Feeling and image Bespoke design 



This research was supported by JST COI Program, “Center of Kansei-oriented Digital Fabrication”.


  1. 1.
    Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, pp. 3928–3937. IEEE Computer Society (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagamachi, M.: Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. Appl. Ergon. 33(3), 289–294 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., Jannach, D.: Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 257–260. ACM, Barcelona (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, pp. 1097–1101. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Making recommendations better: an analytic model for human-recommender interaction. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, pp. 1103–1108. ACM (2006),Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organisations. The Macmillan Company, New York (1948)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takemura, K.: Protocol analysis of multistage decision strategies. Percept. Mot. Skills 77(2), 459–469 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sherman, E., Mathur, A., Smith, R.B.: Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychol. Mark. 14(4), 361–378 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grewal, R., Cline, T.W., Davies, A.: Early-entrant advantage, word-of-mouth communication, brand similarity, and the consumer decision-making process. J. Consum. Psychol. 13(3), 187–197 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R.: When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79(6), 995–1006 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eppler, M.J.: Knowledge communication problems between experts and decision makers: an overview and classification. Electron. J. Knowl. Manag. 5(3), 291–300 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ehrlich, D., Guttman, I., Schönbach, P., Mills, J.: Postdecision exposure to relevant information. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 54(1), 98–102 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Obata, K., Sugimoto, M., Nagata, N.: Optimization of motorcycle riders categorization based on emotion using decision tree analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis 2018), Kobe, p. 136. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sugimoto, M., Yamamoto, M., Nagata, N.: The emotions evoked during individual voluntary manufacture: their characteristics and the timing of their evocation. Trans. Hum. Interface Soc. 21(1), 85--96 (2019). In Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kwansei Gakuin UniversitySandaJapan

Personalised recommendations