Skip to main content

I’m Five Teachers at Once!

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inside Today’s Elementary Schools

Abstract

This chapter explores an idea enchanting the educational world known as “differentiation.” When a teacher “differentiates” a lesson, she considers the different abilities, cultural histories, learning styles, and interests of all the students in the room. Johnny is a visual learner. Carlos has not yet mastered reading. Joyce likes to move around. On paper, differentiation is a great idea, but only so long as the intellectual range of the classroom is small and manageable. But teachers are often in situations where the abilities of their students vary by four, five, and six grade levels. With so many different ability levels to teach in the same room, instructors find it almost impossible to provide sustained, properly executed lessons for every child within a single class period. Differentiation is often used by the Administration to paper over serious deficiencies in students who have not acquired even a minimal proficiency of their prior grade level’s standards (or proficiency in the standards of the prior two, three, or four grade levels). In the end, differentiation as currently practiced forces teachers to do more with less and ultimately masks the extremely serious problem of too many underprepared students in a single room at once.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allensworth, E. M. (2005). Dropout rates after high-stakes testing in elementary school: A study of the contradictory effects of Chicago’s efforts to end social promotion. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 27(4), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. E., Jimerson, S. R., & Whipple, A. D. (2005). Students’ ratings of stressful experiences at home and school: Loss of a parent and grade retention as superlative stressors. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, M. (2014). The scarring effects of primary-grade retention? A study of cumulative advantage in the educational career. Social Forces, 93(2), 653–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M. B., & Rush, C. (2003). Increasing reading achievement of primary and middle school students through differentiated instruction (Masters dissertation). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED479203

  • Chorzempa, B. F., & Graham, S. (2006). Primary-grade teachers’ use of within-class ability grouping in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 529–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dandy, K. L., & Bendersky, K. (2014). Student and faculty beliefs about learning in higher education: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 358–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. M. (2016). The impact of social promotion on the academic performance of students in South Carolina: A forensic multi-year approach (Doctoral dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 76(8-A). Retrieved from http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3662532

  • Fahey, J. (2000). Who wants to differentiate instruction? We did…. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernet, C., Chanal, J., & Guay, F. (2017). What fuels the fire: Job- or task-specific motivation (or both)? On the hierarchical and multidimensional nature of teacher motivation in relation to job burnout. Work & Stress, 31(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1303758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, N., Kawohl, E., & Souvignier, E. (2018). Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 56, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A., & Weinstein, M. (1998). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. American Journal of Education, 106(3), 385–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2011/1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books. Original work published 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50(2), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In NASSP’s Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. G., & Batts, K. (2005). How to implement differentiated instruction? Adjust, adjust, adjust. Journal of Staff Development, 26(4), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. L. (2010). 50 great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorence, J. (2014). Third-grade retention and reading achievement in Texas: A nine year panel study. Social Science Research, 48, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., & Connors, N. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, J. S., Kirby, S. N., & Mariano, L. T. (Eds.). (2010). Ending social promotion without leaving children behind: The case of New York City. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (2008). Real education: Four simple truths for bringing America’s schools back to reality. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo, D. M. (2018). Effectiveness of differentiated instruction in the reading comprehension level of grade-11 senior high school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odgers, S., Symons, A., & Mitchell, I. (2000). Differentiating the curriculum through the use of problem solving. Research in Science Education, 30(3), 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrilli, M. J. (2011). All together now? Education Next, 11(1). Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/all-together-now/

  • Riener, C., & Willingham, D. (2010). The myth of learning styles. Change, 42(5), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2010.503139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning styles: Where’s the evidence? Medical Education, 46(7), 634–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04273.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, C. B., & Karanian, J. M. (2017). The neuroscience of intelligence: Empirical support for the theory of multiple intelligences? Trends in Neuroscience & Education, 6, 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2017.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Sims, S. J. (2006). Learning styles and learning: A key to meeting the accountability demands in education. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, S. D. (2015, January 28). Differentiated instruction: A primer. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/01/28/differentiated-instruction-a-primer.html

  • Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29(1), 60–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiandes, S. (2015). Evaluating the impact of differentiated instruction on literacy and reading in mixed ability classrooms: Quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. R., & Saliba, J. (2012). First through eighth grade retention rates for all 50 states: A new method and initial results. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12457813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, L. (2006). Multiple intelligences, the Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence: A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4104_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James J. Dillon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dillon, J.J. (2019). I’m Five Teachers at Once!. In: Inside Today’s Elementary Schools. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23347-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics