Skip to main content

A Census of Cades Cove Through Gravestones

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

Gravestone data (1840–1939; socio-demographics and epitaphs) were transcribed as social variables to describe various dimensions of the Cades Cove community. This included the sex/gender composition of the community, gender roles and familial statuses, patriarchal dominance and gender inequality, age structures and age statuses, ethnicity implied by surname, family/kinship importance, aspects of community integration (vitality and permeability), social class, homogeneity, religion, and seasonal patterns of fertility and mortality. This illustrates and demonstrates the archival capacity of cemeteries. While there are many things cemeteries cannot disclose, there are a few things only cemeteries can disclose, and the exploitation of cemetery as data source must be adroit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The sex ratio divides the number of males in a population by the number of females, multiplying by 100. The sex ratio for the human species is about 105, which means at birth, there are 105 males for every 100 females. At conception, there are some 120 males for every 100 females; however, fetal mortality is higher for males; by birth, about 105 males are born for every 100 females. Because infant and childhood mortality is higher for males, by the time the age group reaches 20, the sex ratio is about 100 (100 males for every 100 females). Beyond that, with the rate of male mortality remaining greater throughout life, the ratio drops below 100 (fewer males than females).

  2. 2.

    The oldest person buried in Cades Cove was Paralee Myers, age 98, wife of Sherman, born November 4, 1897 and died November 27, 1995, buried in the Primitive Baptist Cemetery with her husband. She was not a lifelong resident of Cades Cove and only spent her childhood there, exemplifying why a reconstruction of the community includes only burials up through 1939. Recent burials do not typify Cades Cove as a historical mountain community.

  3. 3.

    Max Weber (1946) addressed class, status, and party as components of social structure, constituting power in community. Status can be parsed by ethnic or religious groups and substantially refers to lifestyle. The upper social class can afford life opportunities and life chances such as better educations, better employment opportunities, and better lifestyles. In turn, better lifestyles enhance life expectancies. In societal applications and evaluations, the notion of social class tends to take preeminence, nearly to the exclusion of status and party. Most people assume social class, generally a three-class system (upper, middle, lower), as a natural reality, without recognizing status and party, but no particular number of social classes exist; they are social constructions.

References

  • Bean, Lee L., Geraldine P. Mineau, and Douglas L. Anderson. 1990. Fertility Change on the American Frontier: Adaptation and Innovation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., A. Johnson, and D. Mathews. 2019. “The Gendered Language of Gravestones: A Comparative Study of Central and Northern Appalachian Cemeteries.” In Handbook of a Changing World Language Map, edited by S. Brunn, D. Gilbreath and R. Kehrein, 1–14. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, Diana Williams. 1986. Early Gravestone Art in Georgia and South Carolina. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Gaylord. 2009. Stories Told in Stone: Cemetery Iconology. Louisville: Motes Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, William F. 1951. “Death by Dieselization: A Case Study in the Reaction to Technological Change.” American Sociological Review 16 (3): 358–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, Elizabeth A., and Norman Vardney Mackie III. 1990. “The Funerary Monuments and Burial Patterns of Colonial Tidewater Virginia, 1607–1776.” Markers 7: 103–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethlefsen, Edwin. 1969. “Colonial Gravestones and Demography.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 31: 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dethlefsen, Edwin, and James Deetz. 1966. “Death’s Heads, Cherubs, and Willow Trees: Experimental Archaeology in Colonial Cemeteries.” American Antiquity 31 (4): 502–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Durwood. 1988. Cades Cove: The Life and Death of a Southern Appalachian Community, 1818–1937. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Gary S., and Craig M. Eckert. 2003. “Up from the Grave: A Socio-Historical Reconstruction of an African-American Community from Cemetery Data in the Rural Midwest.” Journal of Black Studies 33 (4): 468–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Gary S., and Richard L. Hummel. 1995. “The Adkins-Woodson Cemetery: A Sociological Examination of Cemeteries as Community.” Markers: Journal of the Association of Gravestone Studies 12: 92–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Gary S., Richard L. Hummel, and Donald J. Adamchak. 1998. “Patterns of Conception, Natality and Mortality from Midwestern Cemeteries: A Sociological Analysis of Historical Data.” Sociological Quarterly 39 (3): 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Gary S., Megan Sherrard, Janet R. Cosbey, and Richard L. Hummel. 2001. “Dying to Be Old: A Sociological Analysis of ‘Old Age’ as Cause of Death.” Journal of Aging and Identity 6 (3): 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giguere, Joy M. 2007. “Virtuous Women, Useful Men, and Lovely Children.” Markers 24: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, Melissa. 1999. “A Sociological Analysis of Children’s Gravestones.” Illness, Crisis, and Loss 7: 266–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, Jess D. 1968. Prehistory of North America. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, Albert M., and Jeralynn S. Cossman. 2006. “When People Died: An Examination of Seasonality of Mortality Using an Historic African American Population.” Sociological Spectrum 26: 149–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keister, Douglas. 2004. Stories in Stone: A Field Guide to Cemetery Symbolism and Iconography. Salt Lake City: Gibbs Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, Allen. 1966. Graven Images: New England Stonecarving and Its Symbols, 1650–1815. Middlestown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Elmora Messer. 1965. Neighbor and Kin: Life in a Tennessee Ridge Community. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, Charles W. 2004. Churches of the Smokies. Gatlinburg, TN: Great Smoky Mountains Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Daniel S. 2013. Corn from a Jar: Moonshining in the Great Smoky Mountains. Gatlinburg, TN: Great Smoky Mountains Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Brandon. 2014. “Hier Leydt Begraven: A Primer on Dutch Colonial Gravestones.” Northeast Historical Archaeology 43 (2): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rule, La Reina, and William K. Hammond. 1973. What’s in a Name: Surnames of America. New York: Jove/HBJ Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Gaynell. 2009. “Sacred Landscapes: Material Evidence of Ideological and Ethnic Choice in Long Island, New York, Gravestones, 1680–1800.” Historical Archaeology 43: 142–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Zanden, James. 1988. The Social Experience. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, David S., and Dwight B. Billings. 1977. “The Sociology of Southern Appalachia.” Appalachian Journal 5 (Autumn): 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Cratis D. 1961. “The Southern Mountaineer in Fact and Fiction.” Unpublished Dissertation, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Cratis D., 1972. “Who Are the Southern Mountaineers?” Appalachian Journal 1 (1): 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, E. A., and R. S. Schofield. 1981. The Population History of England, 1541–1871. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurst, Lou Ann. 1991. “‘Employees Must Be of Moral and Temperate Habits:’ Rural and Urban Elite Ideologies.” In Archaeology and Inequality, edited by Randall H. McGuire and Robert Paynter, 125–149. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Frank W. 1960. “Graveyards and Social Structure.” Rural Sociology 25: 446–450.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary S. Foster .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foster, G.S., Lovekamp, W.E. (2019). A Census of Cades Cove Through Gravestones. In: Cemeteries and the Life of a Smoky Mountain Community. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23295-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23295-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23294-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23295-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics