Skip to main content

Neuro-urologic Imaging: A Practical Guide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urological Care for Patients with Progressive Neurological Conditions
  • 337 Accesses

Abstract

Many patients with degenerative neurologic conditions undergo imaging as a routine part of a neurogenic bladder care plan. Fluoroscopy is frequently utilized during urodynamic testing to better define anatomic considerations, which could impact storage and emptying pressure measurements. Ultrasound is a common modality because it does not expose patients to radiation and gathers accurate information regarding renal unit size, shape, and degree of hydronephrosis. Computer tomography offers more anatomic and detail than fluoroscopy and ultrasound, but the radiation exposure from these studies can be considerable. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging, particularly functional MRI, now allowing practitioners to combine detailed anatomic pictures with physiologic information to better understand disease pathology. Despite the multiple different available technologies, there are few standardized recommendations as to which study to use and at what interval. Neurogenic bladder care may involve all of these imaging types at some point.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Reynolds WS, Dmochowski RR, Lai J, Saigal C, Penson DF, Urologic Diseases in America P. Patterns and predictors of urodynamics use in the United States. J Urol. 2013;189(5):1791–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Winters JC, Dmochowski RR, Goldman HB, Herndon CD, Kobashi KC, Kraus SR, et al. Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(6 Suppl):2464–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoffel JT. Chapter: Imaging techniques in the evaluation of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. In: Coros J, Ginsberg D, Karsenty G, editors. Textbook of the neurogenic bladder. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caramella D, Donatelli G, Armillotta N, Manassero F, Traversi C, Frumento P, et al. Videourodynamics in patients with neurogenic bladder due to multiple sclerosis: our experience. Radiol Med. 2011;116(3):432–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Suskind AM, Cox L, Clemens JQ, Oldendorf A, Stoffel JT, Malaeb B, et al. The value of urodynamics in an academic specialty referral practice. Urology. 2017;105:48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brucker BM, Campeau L, Fong E, Kalra S, Rosenblum N, Nitti VW. Radiation exposure during videourodynamics: establishing risk factors. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018;10(2):181–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mauer A. Status and plans for implementation of NRC regulatory authority for certain naturally occurring and accelerator-produced radioactive material. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35(2):112–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Groen J, Pannek J, Castro Diaz D, Del Popolo G, Gross T, Hamid R, et al. Summary of European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on neuro-urology. Eur Urol. 2016;69(2):324–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Ytte L. Kidney dimensions at sonography: correlation with age, sex, and habitus in 665 adult volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(1):83–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoi S, Takata T, Sugihara T, Ida A, Ogawa M, Mae Y, et al. Predictive value of cortical thickness measured by ultrasonography for renal impairment: a longitudinal study in chronic kidney disease. J Clin Med. 2018;7(12). pii: E527. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7120527.

  11. Keays MA, Guerra LA, Mihill J, Raju G, Al-Asheeri N, Geier P, et al. Reliability assessment of Society for Fetal Urology ultrasound grading system for hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2008;180(4. Suppl):1680–2; discussion2-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rickard M, Easterbrook B, Kim S, Farrokhyar F, Stein N, Arora S, et al. Six of one, half a dozen of the other: a measure of multidisciplinary inter/intra-rater reliability of the society for fetal urology and urinary tract dilation grading systems for hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(1):80 e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gulati M, Cheng J, Loo JT, Skalski M, Malhi H, Duddalwar V. Pictorial review: renal ultrasound. Clin Imaging. 2018;51:133–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adriaansen JJE, van Asbeck FWA, Bongers-Janssen HMH, Spijkerman D, Allrisc V-MJMA, et al. Description of urological surveillance and urologic ultrasonography outcomes in a cohort of individuals with long-term spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017;23(1):78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganesan V, Chen WM, Jain R, De S, Monga M. Multiple sclerosis and nephrolithiasis: a matched-case comparative study. BJU Int. 2017;119(6):919–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cogbill TH, Ziegelbein KJ. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound imaging: basic principles, glossary of terms, and patient safety. Surg Clin North Am. 2011;91(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tate DG, Forchheimer M, Rodriguez G, Chiodo A, Cameron AP, Meade M, et al. Risk factors associated with neurogenic bowel complications and dysfunction in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):1679–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology. 2004;232(1):126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stenzl A, Frank R, Eder R, Recheis W, Knapp R, zur Nedden D, et al. 3-Dimensional computerized tomography and virtual reality endoscopy of the reconstructed lower urinary tract. J Urol. 1998;159(3):741–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Crivellaro S, Mami E, Wald C, Smith JJ, Kocjancic E, Stoffel J, et al. Correlation between urodynamic function and 3D cat scan anatomy in neobladders: does it exist? Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(3):236–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liao L, Zhang F, Chen G. New grading system for upper urinary tract dilation using magnetic resonance urography in patients with neurogenic bladder. BMC Urol. 2014;14:38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chun CW, Jung JY, Baik JS, Jee WH, Kim SK, Shin SH. Detection of soft-tissue abscess: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging to contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(1):60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roy HA, Griffiths DJ, Aziz TZ, Green AL, Menke RAL. Investigation of urinary storage symptoms in Parkinson’s disease utilizing structural MRI techniques. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:1168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khavari R, Elias SN, Boone T, Karmonik C. Similarity of functional connectivity patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis who void spontaneously versus patients with voiding dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(1):239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang H, Reitz A, Kollias S, Summers P, Curt A, Schurch B. An fMRI study of the role of suprapontine brain structures in the voluntary voiding control induced by pelvic floor contraction. NeuroImage. 2005;24(1):174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scientific B. US MRI letter https://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/uro-wh/portfolio-group/health-conditions/Erectile%20Dysfunction/US_MRI_Letter_BSC_Brand_9.3.15.pdf2015.

  28. Dill T. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging: non-invasive imaging. Heart. 2008;94(7):943–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Stoffel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stoffel, J.T. (2020). Neuro-urologic Imaging: A Practical Guide. In: Stoffel, J.T., Dray, E.V. (eds) Urological Care for Patients with Progressive Neurological Conditions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23277-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23277-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23276-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23277-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics