Skip to main content

Geomorphic Threshold and SCS-CN-Based Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling in the Gullies of Dwarka–Brahmani Interfluve, West Bengal, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gully Erosion Studies from India and Surrounding Regions

Abstract

Gully erosion signifies instability in the landscape, and it is regarded as a threshold phenomenon under certain conditions in the landscape, relating to flow erosivity and surface resistance. The main cause of gully formation is too much water at a certain location of slope—a threshold condition that may be brought about by external factors or internal factors. Intense rainfall is the primary trigger, but the local conditions such as slope morphometry, land-use and soil characteristics control the triggering of gully erosion. The catchment size above a stream or gully head and the land-use characteristics determine the volume of overland flow but it is different from the concentrated-flow area by its position on the slope. In the present study, the models of geomorphic threshold and the M–D Envelope have emphasized on the role of overland flow (as surface runoff) for initiation of gullies in the laterite slope of Dwarka–Brahmani Interfluve, West Bengal (Neogene–Early Pleistocene lateritic terrain located in between the Rajmahal basalt traps and Bengal basin). The upstream laterite slopes above gully heads are negatively correlated (r = −0.55) with upstream drainage areas which are used as surrogate for the volume of runoff yield in the gullies of the study area. The calculated empirical trend line (S = 17.419 A−0.2517, with R 2 of 0.52) represents an approximation to critical slope–area threshold relationship for gully incision in this region. Then, the Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number (SCS-CN; now called the National Resource Conservation Service, NRCS-CN) method is used for quick and accurate estimation of surface runoff in any storm event in the ungauged watersheds of gullies. Experimenting in three sample watersheds of gullies, it is found that on the basis of rainfall range of 42–137.2 mm the gullies can yield runoff of 40.02–118.0 mm in excess moisture condition of monsoon. The differences of runoff in the catchments for the same rainfall event are the direct effects of land use–land cover derived from CN values. In the gully catchments, the estimated runoff is increased above 22% from Antecedent Moisture Condition (AMC) II to AMC III and in most gullies it ranges from 22.33% to 85.73%. It is understood that if the rainfall amount is increased day by day, the runoff coefficient (R c) is also increased consecutively and it will be high runoff event which is the sign of high vulnerability of flow erosion on the bare laterite slope. The SCS-CN analyses reflect that in prolong rainfall event of tropical depression more than 86% of rainfall can be transformed into direct runoff, as R c is reaching up to 0.86. Alongside, it gives more hydraulic energy to gully initiation and gully head migration in AMC III condition. Based on the daily rainfall-runoff modelling and annual potential erosion rate, the estimated sediment yield varies from 5.0 to 13.45 t ha−1 in the gullies. It is learnt that in prolong rainstorm event or in cyclonic rainfall, with increase of rainfall and moisture content of surface, the transport of eroded materials is increased and substantially, the sediment yield of gully catchment is also escalated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Begin ZB, Schumm SA (1984) Gradational thresholds and landform singularity; significance for quaternary morphology, Geological Society of American Bulletin 56 (3): 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhunya PK, Jain SK, Singh PK, Mishra SK (2014) A simple conceptual model of sediment yield. Water Resource Management 24: 1697–1716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A (1987). Laterites and lateritoids of Bengal. In: Datye VS, Diddee J, Jog SR (eds.), Exploration in the Tropics, University of Pune, Pune, pp. 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull WB (1980) Geomorphic thresholds as defined by ratios. In: Coates DR, Vitek JD (eds), Threshold in Geomorphology, George Allen & Unwin, pp. 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao L, Zhang K, Dai H, Liang Y (2013) Modelling inter-rill erosion on unpaved roads in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation and Development 26 (8): 825–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton R (2008) Fundamentals of Fluvial Geomorphology. Routledge, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGrawHill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates DR, Vitek JD (1980) Perspectives on geomorphic thresholds. In: Coates DR, Vitek JD (eds), Threshold in Geomorphology, George Allen & Unwin, pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Xiong D, Su Z, Li J, Yang D, Zhai J, Lu X, Liu G, Shi L (2013) Critical topographic threshold of gully erosion in Yuanmou dry – hot valley in southwestern China. Physical Geography 34 (1): 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebisemiju FS (1989) Thresholds of gully erosion in a lateritic terrain, Guyana. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 10 (2): 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2014) Relationship between SCS-CN and sediment yield. Applied Water Science, 4: 363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Gucchait SK (2017) Estimation of geomorphic threshold to permanent gullies of lateritic terrain in Birbhum, West Bengal, India. Current Science, 113 (3): 478–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack JT (1973) Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index. Journal of Research of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1 (4): 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1992) Restoring land degraded by gully erosion in the Tropics. In: Lal R, Stewart BA (eds), Soil Restoration. Springer – Verlag, New York, pp. 123–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra SK, Singh VP (2003) Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra SK, Tyagi JV, Singh VP, Singh R (2006) SCS-CN-based modelling of sediment yield. Journal of Hydrology, 324: 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeyersons J (2003) The topographic thresholds of hillslope incisions in southwestern Rwanda. Catena 50: 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1988) Where do channels begin. Nature 336 (6196): 232–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1992) Channel initiation and the problem of landscape scale. Science 255: 826–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (2004) Landscape dissection and drainage area – slope thresholds. In: Kirkby MJ (ed), Process Models and Theoretical Geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 221–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (2005) Soil Erosion and Conservation. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Duzant JH (2008) Modified MMF model for evaluating effects of crops and vegetation cover on soil erosion. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Mngomezulu D (2003) Threshold conditions for initiation of valley-side gullies in the Middle Veld of Swaziland. Catena 50: 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayana, DVV, Babu R (1983). Estimation of soil erosion in India.Journal of Irrigation Drainage Engineering, 109 (4): 419–434, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models I Discussion and Principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak P, Wani SP,Sudi R (2005). Gully Control in SAT Watersheds. Retrieved from Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report No.15 website:http://www.icrisat.org/journal/agroecosystem/v2i1/v2i1gully.pdf

  • Patton PC, Schumm SA (1975) Gully erosion, north-western Colorado: a threshold phenomenon. Geology 3: 88–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, Valentin C (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs. Catena 50: 91–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi M, Torri D, Santi E (2015) Bias in topographic thresholds for gully heads. Natural Hazards, 79: S51–S69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samni AN, Ahmadi H, Jafari M, Boggs G, Ghoddousi J, Malekian A (2009) Geomorphic threshold conditions for gully erosion in southwestern Iran (Boushehe – Samal watershed). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 35 (2): 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A (2013) Quantitative Geography: Techniques and Presentations. Orient Blackswan, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar D, Nayak DC, Dutta D, Gajbhiye KS (2007). Optimizing Land Use of Birbhum District (West Bengal) Soil Resource Assessment. NBSS & LUP, NBSS Publ.130, Nagpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharda VN, Dogra P (2013) Assessment of productivity and monetary losses due to water erosion in rainfed crops across different states of India for prioritization and conservation planning. Agricultural Research,2 (4): 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharda VN, Dogra P, Prakash C (2010) Assessment of production losses due to water erosion in rainfed areas of India.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 65 (2): 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK, Kala S, Dubey SK, Pande VC, Rao BK, Sharma KK,Mahapatra KP (2015). Technology for rehabilitation of Yamuna ravines – cost-effective practices to conserve natural resources through bamboo plantation. Current Science, 108 (8): 1527–1533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, Babu R, Narain P, Bhushan LS, Abrol IP (1992). Soil erosion rates in India.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 47(1): 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Dubey A (2002). Gully Erosion and Management: Methods and Application. New Academic Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RK, Imtiyaz M (2016) Testing of coupled SCS curve number model for estimating runoff and sediment yield for eleven watersheds. Journal Geological Society of India, 88: 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964). Quantitative Geomorphology of Drainage Basins and Channel Networks. In: Chow VT (ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, pp. 4–39 – 4-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Poesen J (2014) A review of topographic threshold conditions for gully head development in different environments. Earth-Science Reviews, 130: 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toy TJ, Foster GR, Renard KG (2013) Soil Erosion: Processes, Prediction, Measurement and Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y (2005) Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control. Catena 63: 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandaele K, Poesen J, Govers G, Wesemael B (1996) Geomorphic threshold conditions for ephemeral gully incision. Geomorphology 16 (2): 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Wijdnes DO, Nachtergaele J, Kosmas C, Roxo MJ, Figueiredo TD (1998) Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25 (11): 1201–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978). Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses – A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA, Agricultural Handbook No. 537, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RC, Bhushan LS (2002) Conservation of gullies in susceptible riparian areas of alluvial soil regions. Land Degradation and Development, 13 (3): 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghosh, S., Guchhait, S.K. (2020). Geomorphic Threshold and SCS-CN-Based Runoff and Sediment Yield Modelling in the Gullies of Dwarka–Brahmani Interfluve, West Bengal, India. In: Shit, P., Pourghasemi, H., Bhunia, G. (eds) Gully Erosion Studies from India and Surrounding Regions. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23243-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics