Skip to main content

An Intelligent-Agent Facilitated Scaffold for Fostering Reflection in a Team-Based Project Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019)

Abstract

This paper reports on work adapting an industry standard team practice referred to as Mob Programming into a paradigm called Online Mob Programming (OMP) for the purpose of encouraging teams to reflect on concepts and share work in the midst of their project experience. We present a study situated within a series of three course projects in a large online course on Cloud Computing. In a \(3\times 3\) Latin Square design, we compare students working alone and in two OMP configurations (with and without transactivity-maximization team formation designed to enhance reflection). The analysis reveals the extent to which grading on the produced software rewards teams where highly skilled individuals dominate the work. Further, compliance with the OMP paradigm is associated with greater evidence of group reflection on concepts and greater shared practice of programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., Rosé, C.P.: Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 24(1), 92–124 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azmitia, M., Montgomery, R.: Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Soc. Dev. 2(3), 202–221 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchan, J., Pearl, M.: Leveraging the mob mentality: an experience report on mob programming. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018, pp. 199–204. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gweon, G., Jain, M., McDonough, J., Raj, B., Rosé, C.P.: Measuring prevalence of other-oriented transactive contributions using an automated measure of speech style accommodation. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 8(2), 245–265 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kattan, H.M., Oliveira, F., Goldman, A., Yoder, J.W.: Mob programming: the state of the art and three case studies of open source software. In: Santos, V.A., Pinto, G.H.L., Serra Seca Neto, A.G. (eds.) WBMA 2017. CCIS, vol. 802, pp. 146–160. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73673-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, R., Rosé, C.P., Wang, Y.C., Joshi, M., Robinson, A.: Tutorial dialogue as adaptive collaborative learning support. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 158, 383 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malmgren, U.: Remote mob programming set up, January 2017. https://natooktesting.wordpress.com/2017/01/30/remote-mob-programming-set-up/

  8. Rosé, C.P., Ferschke, O.: Technology support for discussion based learning: from computer supported collaborative learning to the future of massive open online courses. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(2), 660–678 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sankaranarayanan, S., Dashti, C., Bogart, C., Wang, X., Sakr, M., Rosé, C.P.: When optimal team formation is a choice - self-selection versus intelligent team formation strategies in a large online project-based course. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10947, pp. 518–531. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Wen, M., Maki, K., Dow, S., Herbsleb, J.D., Rose, C.: Supporting virtual team formation through community-wide deliberation. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (CSCW), vol. 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, A.: Mob programming - what works, what doesn’t. In: Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., Paasivaara, M. (eds.) XP 2015. LNBIP, vol. 212, pp. 319–325. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Zuill, W., Meadows, K.: Mob programming: a whole team approach. In: Agile 2014 Conference, Orlando, Florida (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sreecharan Sankaranarayanan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sankaranarayanan, S. et al. (2019). An Intelligent-Agent Facilitated Scaffold for Fostering Reflection in a Team-Based Project Course. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23206-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23207-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics