Skip to main content

Participatory Design to Lower the Threshold for Intelligent Support Authoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11626))

Abstract

One of the fundamental aims of authoring tools is to provide teachers with opportunities to configure, modify and generally appropriate the content and pedagogical strategies of intelligent systems. Despite some progress in the field, there is still a need for tools that have low thresholds in terms of the users’ technical expertise. Here, we demonstrate that designing systems with lower entry barrier can potentially be achieved through co-design activities with non-programmers and carefully observing novices. Following an iterative participatory co-design cycle with teachers who have little or no programming expertise, we reflect on their proposed enhancements. Our investigations focus on Authelo, an authoring tool that has been designed primarily for Exploratory Learning Objects, but we conclude the paper by providing transferable lessons, particularly the strong preference for visual interfaces and high-level pedagogical predicates for authoring analysis and feedback rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aleven, V., et al.: Example-tracing tutors: intelligent tutor development for non-programmers. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 224–269 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0088-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dağ, F., Durdu, L., Gerdan, S.: Evaluation of educational authoring tools for teachers stressing of perceived usability features. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 116, 888–901 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.316. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814003334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaffney, C., Wade, V.P., Dagger, D.: Authoring and delivering personalised simulations an innovative approach to adaptive eLearning for soft skills (2010). http://www.tara.tcd.ie/handle/2262/67212

  4. Gutierrez-Santos, S., Mavrikis, M., Magoulas, G.D.: A separation of concerns for engineering intelligent support for exploratory learning environments. J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol., 103–116 (2012). http://www.acs.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/16706/JRPIT44.3.347.pdf

  5. Karkalas, S., Mavrikis, M.: Feedback authoring for exploratory learning objects: Authelo. In: CSEDU 2016 - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Volume 1, Rome, Italy, 21–23 April 2016, pp. 144–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5220/0005810701440153

  6. Karoui, A., Marfisi-Schottman, I., George, S.: Mobile learning game authoring tools: assessment, synthesis and proposals. In: Bottino, R., Jeuring, J., Veltkamp, R.C. (eds.) GALA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10056, pp. 281–291. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Kynigos, C., Grizioti, M.: Programming approaches to computational thinking: integrating turtle geometry, dynamic manipulation and 3D space. Inform. Educ. 17(2), 321–340 (2018). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1195612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mavrikis, M., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Geraniou, E., Noss, R.: Design requirements, student perception indicators and validation metrics for intelligent exploratory learning environments. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 17(8), 1605–1620 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0524-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray, T.: Coordinating the complexity of tools, tasks, and users: on theory-based approaches to authoring tool usability. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 37–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0076-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., Olivier, P.: Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2013, pp. 429–438. ACM, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470716

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mutlu Cukurova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mavrikis, M., Karkalas, S., Cukurova, M., Papapesiou, E. (2019). Participatory Design to Lower the Threshold for Intelligent Support Authoring. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23206-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23207-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics