Skip to main content

Predicting Multi-document Comprehension: Cohesion Network Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11625))

Abstract

Theories of discourse comprehension assume that understanding is a process of making connections between new information (e.g., in a text) and prior knowledge, and that the quality of comprehension is a function of the coherence of the mental representation. When readers are exposed to multiple sources of information, they must make connections both within and between the texts. One challenge is how to represent this coherence and in turn how to predict readers’ levels of comprehension. In this study, we represent coherence using Cohesion Network Analysis (CNA) in which we model a global cohesion graph that semantically links reference texts to different student verbal productions. Our aim is to create an automated model of comprehension prediction based on features extracted from the CNA graph. We examine the cohesion links between the four texts read by 146 students and their (a) self-explanations generated on target sentences and (b) responses to open-ended questions. We analyze the degree to which features derived from the cohesive links from the extended CNA graph are predictive of students’ comprehension scores (on a [0 to 12] scale) using either (a) students’ self-explanations, (b) responses to comprehension questions, or (c) both. We compared the use of Linear Regression, Extra Trees Regressor, Support Vector Regression, and Multi-Layer Perceptron. Our best model used Linear Regression, obtaining a 1.29 mean absolute error when predicting comprehension scores using both sources of verbal responses (i.e., self-explanations and question answers).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, L.K., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D.S.: Cohesive features of deep text comprehension processes. In: 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2681–2686. Cognitive Science Society, Philadelphia, PA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dascalu, M., McNamara, D.S., Trausan-Matu, S., Allen, L.K.: Cohesion network analysis of CSCL participation. Behav. Res. Methods 50(2), 604–619 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hastings, P., Hughes, S., Magliano, J.P., Goldman, S.R., Lawless, K.: Assessing the use of multiple sources in student essays. Behav. Res. Methods 44(3), 622–633 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Pearson Prentice Hall, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McNamara, D.S., Magliano, J.: Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 51, 297–384 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kintsch, W.: The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychol. Rev. 95(2), 163 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K., Hemmerich, J.A.: Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science in-quiry tasks. Am. Educ. Res. J. 46(4), 1060–1106 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Magliano, J., McCrudden, M.T., Rouet, J.F., Sabatini, J.: The modern reader: should changes to how we read affect research and theory? In: Schober, M.F., Rapp, D.N., Britt, M.A. (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Processes, 2nd Ed. Taylor & Francis, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldman, S.R., Braasch, J.L., Wiley, J., Graesser, A.C., Brodowinska, K.: Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Read. Res. Q. 47(4), 356–381 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldman, S.R., Rakestraw, J.A.: Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In: Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D., Barr, R. (eds.) Handbook of Reading Research, vol. 3, pp. 311–335. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozuru, Y., Briner, S., Kurby, C.A., McNamara, D.S.: Comparing text comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 215–227 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chi, M.T., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., LaVancher, C.: Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cogn. Sci. 18(3), 439–477 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McNamara, D.S.: Self-explanation and reading strategy training (SERT) improves low-knowledge students’ science course performance. Discourse Processes 54(7), 479–492 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., McNamara, D.S., Dessus, P.: ReaderBench – automated evaluation of collaboration based on cohesion and dialogism. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 10(4), 395–423 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Trausan-Matu, S., Dascalu, M., Dessus, P.: Textual complexity and discourse structure in computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 352–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Dessus, P.: Cohesion-based analysis of CSCL conversations: holistic and individual perspectives. In: 10th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2013), vol. 1, pp. 145–152. ISLS, Madison, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dascalu, M., Dessus, P., Bianco, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Nardy, A.: Mining texts, learner productions and strategies with ReaderBench. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Educational Data Mining. SCI, vol. 524, pp. 345–377. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02738-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Comput. Linguist. 32(1), 13–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dascalu, M.: Analyzing Discourse and Text Complexity for Learning and Collaborating. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 534. Springer, Switzerland (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03419-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25(2/3), 259–284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representation in vector space. In: Workshop at ICLR, Scottsdale, AZ (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(4–5), 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb semantics and lexical selection. In: 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 1994, pp. 133–138. ACL, New Mexico (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the ReadME project “Interactive and Innovative application for evaluating the readability of texts in Romanian Language and for improving users’ writing styles”, contract no. 114/15.09.2017, MySMIS 2014 code 119286, the FP7 2008-212578 LTfLL project, the Institute of Education Sciences (R305A180144 and R305A180261), and the Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-1-2300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihai Dascalu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nicula, B., Perret, C.A., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D.S. (2019). Predicting Multi-document Comprehension: Cohesion Network Analysis. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11625. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23203-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23204-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics