Abstract
‘Does the geometric design of centrioles imply their function? Several principles of construction of a microscopically small device for locating the directions of signal sources in microscopic dimensions: it appears that the simplest and smallest device that is compatible with the scrambling influence of thermal fluctuations, as are demonstrated by Brownian motion, is a pair of cylinders oriented at right angles to each other. Centrioles locate the direction of hypothetical signals inside cells’ (Albrecht-Buehler G, Cell Motil, 1:237–245; 1981).
Despite a century of devoted efforts (articles on the centrosome always begin like this) its role remains vague and nebulous: does the centrosome suffer from bad press? Likely it does, it has an unfair image problem. It is dispensable in mitosis, but a fly zygote, artificially deprived of centrosomes, cannot start its development; its sophisticated architecture (200 protein types, highly conserved during evolution) constitutes an enigmatic puzzle; centrosome reduction in gametogenesis is a challenging brainteaser; its duplication cycle (only one centrosome per cell) is more complicated than chromosomes. Its striking geometric design (two ninefold symmetric orthogonal centrioles) shows an interesting correspondence with the requirements of a cellular compass: a reference system organizer based on a pair of orthogonal goniometers; through its two orthogonal centrioles, the centrosome may play the role of a cell geometry organizer: it can establish a finely tuned geometry, inherited and shared by all cells. Indeed, a geometrical and informational primary role for the centrosome has been ascertained in Caenorhabditis elegans zygote: the sperm centrosome locates its polarity factors. The centrosome, through its aster of microtubules, possesses all the characteristics necessary to operate as a biophysical geometric compass: it could recognize cargoes equipped with topogenic sequences and drive them precisely to where they are addressed (as hypothesized by Albrecht-Buehler nearly 40 years ago). Recently, this geometric role of the centrosome has been rediscovered by two important findings; in the Kupffer’s vesicle (the laterality organ of zebrafish), chiral cilia orientation and rotational movement have been described: primary cilia, in left and right halves of the Kupffer’s vesicle, are symmetrically oriented relative to the midline and rotate in reverse direction. In mice node (laterality organ) left and right perinodal cells can distinguish flow directionality through their primary cilia: primary cilium, ninefold symmetric, is strictly connected to the centrosome that is located immediately under it (basal body). Kupffer’s vesicle histology and mirror behaviour of mice perinodal cells suggest primary cilia are enantiomeric geometric organelles. What is the meaning of the geometric design of centrioles and centrosomes? Does it imply their function?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abouchar L, Petkova MD, Steinhardt CR, Gregor T (2014) Fly wing vein patterns have spatial reproducibility of a single cell. J R Soc Interface 11:20140443
Ajduk A, Zernicka-Goetz M (2016) Polarity and cell division orientation in the cleavage embryo: from worm to human. Mol Hum Reprod 22(10):691–703
Alliegro MC, Alliegro MA, Palazzo RE (2006) Centrosome-associated RNA in surfclam oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:9034–9038
Alvarado AS (2004) Planarians. Curr Biol 14:R737–R738
Avidor-Reiss T (2015) Atypical centrioles during sexual reproduction. Front Cell Dev Biol 3:21
Azimzadeh J (2014) Exploring the evolutionary history of centrosomes. Philos Trans R Soc B 369:20130453
Azimzadeh J, Wong ML, Downhour DM, Sánchez Alvarado A, Marshall WF (2012) Centrosome loss in the evolution of planarians. Science 335(6067):461–463
Basto R, Lau J, Vinogradova T, Gardiol A, Woods CG, Khodjakov A, Raff JW (2006) Flies without centrioles. Cell 125(7):1375–1386
Beisson J, Jerka-Dziadosz M (1999) Polarities of the centriolar structure: morphogenetic consequences. Biol Cell 91:367–378
Biase FH, Cao X, Zhong S (2014) Cell fate inclination within 2-cell and 4-cell mouse embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing, vol 24. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, pp 1787–1796
Brown NA, Wolpert L (1990) The development of handedness in left/right asymmetry. Development 109:1–9
Bryant SV, French V, Bryant PJ (1981) Distal regeneration and symmetry. Science 212:993–1002
Coelho PA (2013) Spindle formation in the mouse embryo requires Plk4 in the absence of centrioles. DevCell 27:586–597
Danilchik MV, Brown EE, Riegert K (2006) Intrinsic chiral properties of the Xenopus egg cortex: an early indicator of left-right asymmetry? Development 15:4517–4526
Feldman JL (2007) The mother centriole plays an instructive role in defining cell geometry. PLoS Biol (5):e149
Ferreira RR, Vilfan A, Pakula G, Supatto W, Vermot J (2018) Chiral cilia orientation in the left-right organizer. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/252502
Foe VE (1989) Mitotic domains reveal early commitment of cells in Drosophila embryos. Development 107:1–22
Gáspár I, Ephrussi A (2017) RNA localization feeds translation. Science 357(6357):1235–1236
Geimer S, Melkonian M (2004) The ultrastructure of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii basal apparatus: identification of an early marker of radial asymmetry inherent in the basal body. J Cell Sci 117:2663–2674
Goto M (2010) Speriolin is a novel human and mouse sperm centrosome protein. HumReprod 25:1884–1894
Guichard P (2010) Procentriole assembly revealed by cryo-electron tomography. EMBO J 29:1565–1572
Hildreth V, Webb S, Chaudhry B (2009) Left cardiac isomerism in the Sonic hedgehog null mouse. J Anat 214:894–904
Hoops H, Witman G (1983) Outer doublet heterogeneity reveals structural polarity related to beat direction in Chlamydomonas flagella. J Cell Biol 97:902–908
Jin YX (2012) Cat fertilization by mouse sperm injection. Zygote 20:371–378
Kitagawa D (2011) Structural basis of the 9-fold symmetry of centrioles. Cell 144:364–375
Li G, Liu X, Xing C, Zhang H, Shimeld SM, Wanga Y (2017) Cerberus–Nodal–Lefty–Pitx signalling cascade controls left–right asymmetry in amphioxus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:3684–3689
Loukil A, Tormanen K, Sütterlin C (2017) The daughter centriole controls ciliogenesis by regulating Neurl-4 localization at the centrosome. J Cell Biol 216(5):1287–1300
Manandhar G (2000) Centrosome reduction during mammalian spermiogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol 49:343–363
Mennella V (2014) Amorphous no more: subdiffraction view of the Pericentriolar Material architecture. Trends Cell Biol 24:188–197
Morris VB (2007) Origins of radial symmetry identified in an echinoderm during adult development and the inferred axes of ancestral bilateral symmetry. Proc Biol Sci 27:1511–1516
Nance J, Zallen JA (2011) Elaborating polarity: PAR proteins and the cytoskeleton. Development 138(5):799–809
Nonaka S, Shiratori H, Saijoh Y, Hamada H (2002) Determination of left-right patterning of the mouse embryo by artificial nodal flow. Nature 418:96–99
Okabe N, Xu B, Burdine RD (2008) Fluid dynamics in zebrafish Kupffer’s vesicle. Dev Dyn 237:3602–3612
Regolini M, Barvitenko N, Lawen A, Muhammad A, Pantaleo A, Saldanha C, Skverchinskaya E, Tuszynski JA (2018) Integration of intracellular signaling: biological analogues of wires, processors and memories organized by a centrosome 3D reference system. Biosystems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2018.08.007
Ruiz F, Garreau N, Klotz C, Koll F, Beisson J (2006) Centrin deficiency in Paramecium affects the geometry of basal-body duplication. Curr Biol 2097:106
Sánchez-Huertas S, Lüders J (2015) The augmin connection in the geometry of microtubule network. Curr Biol 25(7):R294–R299
Schubiger G, Schubiger M, Sustar A (2012) The three leg imaginal discs of Drosophila: “Vive ladifference”. Dev Biol 369:76–90
Silflow C (2001) The Vfl1 protein in Chlamydomonas localizes in a rotationally asymmetric pattern at the distal ends of the basal bodies. J Cell Biol 153:63–74
Strachan T, Read A (2010) Human molecular genetics. Garland Science, New York, Chaps 9.3, 10 and p 334
Tassin AM, Lemullois M, Aubusson-Fleury A (2016) Paramecium tetraurelia basal body structure. Cilia 5:6
Tovey CA, Tubman CE, Conduit PC (2018) γ-Turc heterogeneity revealed by analysis of Mozart1. Curr Biol 28:2314–2323
Vandenberg LN, Levin M (2009) Perspectives and open problems in the early phases of left-right patterning. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20:456–463
Washitani-Nemoto S (1994) Artificial parthenogenesis in starfish eggs: behavior of nuclei and chromosomes resulting in tetraploidy of parthenogenotes produced by the suppression of polar body extrusion. Dev Biol 163:293–301
Xu J, Van Keymeulen A, Wakida NM, Carlto P, Berns MW, Bourne HR (2007) Polarity reveals intrinsic cell chirality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:9296–9300
Yoshiba S, Hamada H (2014) Roles of cilia, fluid flow, and Ca2+ signalling in breaking of left–right symmetry. Trends Genet 30:10–17
Yoshiba S, Shiratori HY, Kuo IY, Aiko Kawasumi A, Shinohara K, Nonaka S, Asai Y, Sasaki G, Belo JA, Sasaki H, Nakai J, Dworniczak B, Ehrlich BE, Pennekamp P, Hamada H (2012) Cilia at the node of mouse embryos sense fluid flow for left-right determination via Pkd2. Science 338:226–231
Zonies S, Motegi F, Hao Y, Seydoux G (2010) Symmetry breaking and polarization of the C. elegans zygote by the polarity protein PAR-2. Development 137(10):1669–1677
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Regolini, M. (2019). The Centrosome as a Geometry Organizer. In: Kloc, M. (eds) The Golgi Apparatus and Centriole. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23173-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23173-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23172-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23173-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)