Advertisement

Quality and Efficiency Indicators of Remote Laboratories

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 80)

Abstract

In the course of digitization of educational processes, the importance of using a complex of remote laboratories in the processes of distance learning programs in engineering specialties is increasing. Indicators are proposed for assessing the quality of remote laboratory applications in hybrid learning processes in which laboratory work is performed remotely and in class. These indicators assess the extent to which curricula and courses are covered by remote laboratory work, the applicability of a remote laboratory of one or a set of such laboratories to use in a training course or program, indicators of the diversity of experiments and the loading of a remote laboratory.

Keywords

Remote laboratory Indicators of applicability and quality 

References

  1. 1.
    Azad, A.K.M., Auer, M.E., Harward, V.J. (eds.): Internet accessible remote laboratories: scalable e-Learning tools for engineering and science disciplines. In: Engineering Science Reference, 645p (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gravier, C., et al.: State of the art about remote laboratories paradigms—foundations of ongoing mutations. Int. J. Online Eng. (iJOE) 4(1), 1–9 (2008)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gomes, L., Bogosyan, S.: Current trends in remote laboratories. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56(12), 4744–4756 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2033293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gonzalez, J.L.V., Aviles, J.B., Muñoz, A.R., Palomares, R.A.: An industrial automation course: common infrastructure for physical, virtual and remote laboratories for PLC programming. IJOE 14(08), 4–19 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v14i08.8758Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Remote and virtual tools in engineering: monograph/general editorship Karsten Henke, Dike Pole, Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine, 250p (2015). ISBN 978–966–2752–74–8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dintsios, N., Artemi, S., Polatoglou, H.: Acceptance of remote experiments in secondary students. IJOE 14(05), 4–19 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v14i05.8678Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chevalier, A., Copot, C., Hegedus, A., De Keyser, R.: Remote laboratory as a novel tool for control engineering studies: a feedback study. In: Processing of 14th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment OPTIM 2014 May 22–24, 2014, Brasov, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gomes, L., Garsia-Zubia, J.: Advances on Remote Laboratories and e-learning Experiences, 310p. Deusto, Bilbao (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Odeh, S.: A web-based remote lab platform with reusability for electronic experiments in engineering education. iJOE 10(4), 40–45 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tho, S.W., Yeung, Y.Y.: Technology-enhanced science learning through remote laboratory: System design and pilot implementation in tertiary education. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 32(3), 96–111 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chandre, B.R., Geevarghese, K.P., Gangadhara, K.V.: Design and implementation of remote mechatronics laboratory for eLearning using LabVIEW and smartphone and cross-platform communication toolkit (SCCT). Procedia Technol. 14, 108–115 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    GOLDi-labs cloud Website: http://goldi-labs.net

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zaporizhzhya National Technical UniversityZaporizhzhyaUkraine
  2. 2.Ilmenau University of Technology, TU IlmenauIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations