Skip to main content

Thinking About Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover An Introduction to Medical Decision-Making

Abstract

Thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making are skills we often take for granted but are at the core of providing good medical practice. Medical schools and post-graduate training programs do not include any formal instruction of the principles and mechanics of clinical decision-making. They assume that the medical student or resident will develop good thinking and decision-making skills almost by osmosis in the course of their training. We would like to think physicians and other care providers are somehow “scientific” or “logical” when making decisions. This viewpoint is flawed and inaccurate. Our thought processes may be, based on outdated or erroneous knowledge, illogical or influenced by our memories, emotions, and biases—errors we may be totally unaware of. We are not always the best judge of our knowledge or capabilities, factors important to making the best decision or obtaining the best result for the patient. We make decisions using many different approaches, approaches usually chosen subconsciously, and our decisions are often influenced by time constraints, the urgency of the situation, or the presence of flawed or inadequate information. As a result, the approach chosen to solve a problem may be inappropriate for the problem at hand. Good decision-making requires an understanding of the principles and approaches available for making a decision. Decision-making is a discipline that can be studied and learned.

Different situations require different cognitive strategies. How we decide should depend on what we are deciding.

(Lehrer 2009, page. 166)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bilalic M, McLeod P. Why your first idea can blind you to a better one. Scientific American. March 2014. (See also: The Editors, How Psychologists Study the Einstellung Effect in Chess, Scientific American. 2014.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard DW. How To Measure Anything: Finding The Value Of Intangibles In Business. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN. How we Reason. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc.; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy B. quoted by Roger Lowenstein in “Intrinsic Value”, The Wall Street Journal, Page C-1. June 1, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Second Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. 1956; 63: 81–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potchen EJ, Cooper TG, Sierra AE, et al. Measuring performance in chest radiography. Radiology. 2000; 217(2): 456–459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross PE. (2006). The expert mind: Studies of the mental processes of chess grandmasters have revealed clues to how people become experts in other fields as well. Scientific American. 24 July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saposnik G, Redelmeier D, Ruff CC, Tobler PN. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systemic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2016; 16: 138. Accessed 2 April, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books, The Perseus Group; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiralkar U. Smart Surgeons Sharp Decisions: Cognitive Skills to Avoid Errors and Achieve Results. Shrewsbury, UK: The Surgical Psychology Series, tfm Publishing, Limited, Shrewsbury, UK; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson TD. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vordermark II, J.S. (2019). Thinking About Thinking. In: An Introduction to Medical Decision-Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23147-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23147-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23146-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23147-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics