Abstract
The USA is in the midst of a very difficult and protracted revision of its place in the international system. Its role as a global leader, a major pillar of international security and centre of the global economic and political order is unsustainable and is increasingly rejected from both outside and within. Adapting to this new role will not be linear and will develop at different paces in different regions. In the middle term, it will proceed with a harsh and prolonged confrontation with Russia and China as well as with a substantial increase in the US foreign policy unilateralism. The latter will fluctuate from administration to administration, but the common denominator will be a less multilateralist and benign approach than that in the Obama era. Because the USA remains the most powerful player militarily, and diplomatically, retains the dominant position in global finance and has been the centrepiece of the prevailing global governance system for decades, both the international order and global governance will suffer negative consequences until the USA completes its transition to new modalities of participation in the international system. Only when the USA finally accepts rules for equal relations with the other poles can a new international order and a new pattern of global governance emerge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The author shares G. John Ikenberry’s approach of perceiving international order as a multi-level ‘geological strata’ with basic principles of order (state sovereignty) at the lowest levels and more sophisticated systems of rules and norms at the upper ones.
References
Cavanna, T. P. (2018). What does China’s belt and road initiative mean for US grand strategy. The Diplomat. Accessed April 25, 2019, from https://thediplomat.com/2018/06/what-does-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-mean-for-us-grand-strategy/
Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our global neighbourhood: The report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hendrix, C. (2016, November 14). Protectionism in the 2016 election: Causes and consequences, truths and fictions (Policy Brief 1620). Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan. The origins, crisis and transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lake, A. (1993, September 21). “From containment to enlargement”. Remarks of Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies. Retrieved from https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/lakedoc.html
Legvold, R. (2016). Return to Cold war. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mandelbaum, M. (2019). The new containment. Handling Russia, China, and Iran. Foreign Affairs, 98, 123.
Mattis, J. N. (2018). Remarks by Secretary Mattis at Plenary Session of the 2018 Shangri-La Dialogue. Department of Defense, 2.
Mazarr, M. J., et al. (2017). Measuring the health of the liberal international order. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
McBride, J. (2019, March 7). Is “Made in China 2025” a threat to global trade? Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/made-china-2025-threat-global-trade
Merry, R. (2019). Donald Trump vs. the Elites? The National Interest. Accessed April 25, 2019, from https://nationalinterest.org/feature/2019-donald-trump-vs-elites-39592
National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. (1994). Seal of the President of the United States. The White House. Retrieved from http://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/strategy/nss94.pdf
National Security Strategy of the United States of America. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
Nuclear Posture Review. (2018). Department of Defense, United States of America. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF
Pence, M. (2018). Remarks by Vice President on the administration’s policy toward China. Washington, DC: The Hudson Institute. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-vice-president-pence-administrations-policy-toward-china/.
Posen, B. R. (2018). The rise of Illiberal Hegemony: Trump’s surprising grand strategy. Foreign Affairs, 97, 20.
Putz, C. (2016). What is China and Russia’s ‘Eternal Friendship’ worth?. The Diplomat. Accessed April 25, 2019, from https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/what-is-china-and-russias-eternal-friendship-worth/
Rumer, E. (2018). A farewell to arms…Control. Carnegie endowment for international peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2018/04/17/farewell-to-arms-.-.-.-control-pub-76088
Shapiro, J. L. (2017). Russia and China’s alliance of convenience. GPF Geopolitical Futures. Accessed April, 25, 2019, from https://geopoliticalfutures.com/russia-chinas-alliance-convenience-1/
Stokes, D. (2018). Trump, American hegemony and the future of the liberal international order. International Affairs, 94(1), 133–150.
Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. (2018). Retrieved from https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf
Suslov, D. (2014). For a good long while. Russia in Global Affairs. № 4, 2014. Retrieved from https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/For-a-Good-Long-While-17211
Thayer, C. A. (2011). Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea and Southeast Asian responses. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(2), 77–104.
Tillerson, R. (2017). Defining our relationship with India for the next century: By U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. CSIS Headquarters. Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/events/defining-our-relationship-india-next-century-address-us-secretary-state-rex-tillerson
Tillerson, R. (2018a, February). U.S. engagement in the western hemisphere. University of Texas at Austin.
Tillerson, R. (2018b, March). U.S.-Africa relations: A new framework. George Mason University.
Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Rethinking global governance? Complexity, authority, power, change. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 207–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suslov, D. (2020). The USA in a ‘Post-West’ World: Difficulties of Adaptation and Implications for International Order and Global Governance. In: Grigoryev, L., Pabst, A. (eds) Global Governance in Transformation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23092-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23092-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23091-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23092-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)