Skip to main content

Is Global Governance Unravelling? The Revolt Against Liberal Globalisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Governance in Transformation

Abstract

The system of global governance rests on the liberal world order at the heart of international politics since the end of World War II and especially since 1989—notably the United Nations and the Bretton Woods institutions. But the liberal model of globalisation and Western-dominated multilateral organisations are increasingly at odds with non-liberal conceptions of multipolarity and civilisational diversity of non-Western powers. While the institutions of global governance will likely endure, the five fundamental forces of capitalism, statism, technology, liberalism and globalisation have hollowed out the political culture and the substantive values on which it depends.

Just as the liberal world order is in reality illiberal and tends towards disorder, so too global governance is less a worldwide system of cooperation to address transnational problems than it is an arrangement that suits the interests of Western ‘great powers’. Moreover, the dominant system of global governance will not resolve the pressing problems of economic injustice, social dislocation and ecological devastation until it tames the five forces and embeds them in relationships and institutions that can democratise and domesticate them. The growing backlash against neo-liberal globalisation in the West and elsewhere highlights the need for constructive alternatives to the liberal world order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alisson, G. (2018). The myth of the liberal order: From historical accident to conventional wisdom. Foreign Affairs, 97(4), 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2009). Does ethics have a chance in a world of consumers? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. A. (2010). China’s new confucianism, politics in everyday life in a changing society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouvet, L. (2015). L’insécurité culturelle. Sortir du malaise identitaire français. Paris: Editions Fayard. [In French].

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C. (2017). The French, coming apart. City Journal. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.city-journal.org/html/french-coming-apart-15125.html

  • Douthat, R. (2016). The crisis for liberalism. New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/sunday/the-crisis-for-liberalism.html

  • Ellwood, D. W. (1992). Rebuilding Europe: Western Europe, America and post-war reconstruction. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmott, B. (2017). The fate of the west. The battle to save the world’s most successful political Idea. Washington, DC: The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2005). Colossus: The rise and fall of the American Empire. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flockhart, T. (2016). The coming multi-order world. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankopan, P. (2015). The Silk Roads: A new history of the world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (2006). Two faces of neo-liberalism. In R. Robison (Ed.), The neo-liberal revolution: Forging the market state (pp. 20–35). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, F. (2003). US ‘is an empire in denial’. Historian accuses Washington of failing to face the facts. The Guardian. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/jun/02/highereducation.books

  • Hast, S. (2014). Spheres of influence in international relations: History, theory and politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1998). World disorders: Troubled peace in the post-Cold War era. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (2003). Empire lite: Nation-building in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal leviathan. The origins, crisis and transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowitt, K. (1991). After Leninism: The New World disorder. Journal of Democracy, 2(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jowitt, K. (1992). New world disorder: The Leninist extinction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, M. (1993). The new Cold War? Religious nationalism confronts the secular state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. (2015). Other people’s money: Masters of the universe or servants of the people? London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, G. F. (1960). Russia and the West under Lenin and Stalin. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krastev, I. (2016). The unraveling of the post-1989 order. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krastev, I. (2017). After Europe. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1969). The agony of the American left. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1977). Haven in a heartless world. The family besieged. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of Narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilla, M. (2016). The end of identity liberalism. New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-identity-liberalism.html?_r=0

  • Lilla, M. (2017). The once and future liberal. After identity politics. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, B., & Teles, S. (2017). The captured economy: How the powerful become richer, slow down growth, and increase inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowles, N., & Painter, A. (2011). Fear and hope: The new politics of identity. London: Searchlight Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, E. (2017). The retreat of Western liberalism. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, B. C. (2005). End of the line: The rise and coming fall of the global corporation. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, B. C. (2010). Cornered: The new monopoly capitalism and the economics of destruction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, N. (2013). The empire trap: The rise and fall of US intervention to protect American property overseas (pp. 1893–2013). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbank, J., & Pabst, A. (2016). The politics of virtue: Post-liberalism and the human future. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. (2017). The strange death of Europe: Immigration, identity, Islam. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niblett, R. (2017). Liberalism in retreat: The demise of a dream. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcott, M. S. (2004). An angel directs the storm: Apocalyptic religion and American Empire. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S., Jr. (2017). Will the liberal order survive: The history of an idea. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, A. (2016a). Brexit, post-liberalism, and the politics of paradox. Telos, 176, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, A. (2016b). Trump’s triumph: The failure of Clinton’s progressive politics and the demise of the liberal world order. Telos, 177, 192–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, A. (2017). Europe’s commonwealth: Greater Europe beyond core EU and economic Eurasia. In P. Schulze (Ed.), Core Europe and/or Greater Eurasia: Options for the future (pp. 71–93). Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, A. (2018a). ‘War of position’: Liberal interregnum and the emergent ideologies. Telos, 183, 169–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, A. (2018b). Liberal world order and its critics: Civilisational states and cultural commonwealths. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, A. (2019). The demons of liberal democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2015). The American middle class is losing ground: No longer the majority and falling behind financially. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/12/2015-12-09_middle-class_FINAL-report.pdf

  • Pfaff, W. (2010). The irony of manifest destiny: The tragedy of American Foreign Policy. New York: Walker & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R. V. (2017). Dream Hoarders: How the American upper middle class is leaving everyone else in the dust, why that is a problem, and what to do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (1992). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st-century capitalism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2015). Friction is now between global financial elite and the rest of us. The Guardian. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/11/us-uk-politics-economics

  • Reynolds, D. (2013). The long shadow: The great war and the twentieth century. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, D. (2002). A bed for the night: Humanitarianism in crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieff, D. (2011). R2P, R.I.P. The New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/opinion/r2p-rip.html

  • Sakwa, R. (2014). Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, R. (2016). How the Eurasian elites envisage the role of the EEU in global perspective. European Politics and Society, 17(suppl. 1), 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, R. (2017). Russia against the rest: The post-Cold war crisis of world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (2003). The West and the rest: Globalisation and the terrorist threat. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1990). The name of the game. In N. X. Rizopoulous (Ed.), Sea changes: American Foreign policy in a world transformed (pp. 260–273). New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suskind, R. (2004). Faith, certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush. New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/faith-certainty-and-the-presidency-of-george-w-bush.html

  • The Social Mobility Commission. (2016, November). State of the nation 2016: Social mobility in Great Britain. London: Social Mobility Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Social Mobility Commission. (2017, November). State of the nation 2017: Social mobility in Great Britain. London: Social Mobility Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (1997). Imperial metaphors: Emerging European analogies to pre-nation-state imperial systems. In O. Tunander, P. Baev, & V. I. Einangel (Eds.), Geopolitics in post-wall Europe (pp. 59–93). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaqing, Q. (2011). The possibility and inevitability of a Chinese school of international relations theory. In W. A. Callahan & E. Barabantseva (Eds.), China orders the world: Normative soft power and foreign policy (pp. 37–53). Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielonka, J. (2018). Counter-revolution. Liberal Europe in retreat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Pabst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pabst, A. (2020). Is Global Governance Unravelling? The Revolt Against Liberal Globalisation. In: Grigoryev, L., Pabst, A. (eds) Global Governance in Transformation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23092-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics