Abstract
The system of global governance rests on the liberal world order at the heart of international politics since the end of World War II and especially since 1989—notably the United Nations and the Bretton Woods institutions. But the liberal model of globalisation and Western-dominated multilateral organisations are increasingly at odds with non-liberal conceptions of multipolarity and civilisational diversity of non-Western powers. While the institutions of global governance will likely endure, the five fundamental forces of capitalism, statism, technology, liberalism and globalisation have hollowed out the political culture and the substantive values on which it depends.
Just as the liberal world order is in reality illiberal and tends towards disorder, so too global governance is less a worldwide system of cooperation to address transnational problems than it is an arrangement that suits the interests of Western ‘great powers’. Moreover, the dominant system of global governance will not resolve the pressing problems of economic injustice, social dislocation and ecological devastation until it tames the five forces and embeds them in relationships and institutions that can democratise and domesticate them. The growing backlash against neo-liberal globalisation in the West and elsewhere highlights the need for constructive alternatives to the liberal world order.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alisson, G. (2018). The myth of the liberal order: From historical accident to conventional wisdom. Foreign Affairs, 97(4), 124–133.
Bauman, Z. (2009). Does ethics have a chance in a world of consumers? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bell, D. A. (2010). China’s new confucianism, politics in everyday life in a changing society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty (pp. 118–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bouvet, L. (2015). L’insécurité culturelle. Sortir du malaise identitaire français. Paris: Editions Fayard. [In French].
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Caldwell, C. (2017). The French, coming apart. City Journal. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.city-journal.org/html/french-coming-apart-15125.html
Douthat, R. (2016). The crisis for liberalism. New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/sunday/the-crisis-for-liberalism.html
Ellwood, D. W. (1992). Rebuilding Europe: Western Europe, America and post-war reconstruction. London: Longman.
Emmott, B. (2017). The fate of the west. The battle to save the world’s most successful political Idea. Washington, DC: The Economist.
Ferguson, N. (2005). Colossus: The rise and fall of the American Empire. London: Penguin.
Flockhart, T. (2016). The coming multi-order world. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(1), 3–30.
Frankopan, P. (2015). The Silk Roads: A new history of the world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Gamble, A. (2006). Two faces of neo-liberalism. In R. Robison (Ed.), The neo-liberal revolution: Forging the market state (pp. 20–35). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibbons, F. (2003). US ‘is an empire in denial’. Historian accuses Washington of failing to face the facts. The Guardian. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/jun/02/highereducation.books
Hast, S. (2014). Spheres of influence in international relations: History, theory and politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hoffmann, S. (1998). World disorders: Troubled peace in the post-Cold War era. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Ignatieff, M. (2003). Empire lite: Nation-building in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan. London: Vintage.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal leviathan. The origins, crisis and transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The end of liberal international order? International Affairs, 94(1), 7–23.
Jowitt, K. (1991). After Leninism: The New World disorder. Journal of Democracy, 2(1), 11–20.
Jowitt, K. (1992). New world disorder: The Leninist extinction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Juergensmeyer, M. (1993). The new Cold War? Religious nationalism confronts the secular state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kay, J. (2015). Other people’s money: Masters of the universe or servants of the people? London: Profile Books.
Kennan, G. F. (1960). Russia and the West under Lenin and Stalin. New York: Mentor.
Krastev, I. (2016). The unraveling of the post-1989 order. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 5–15.
Krastev, I. (2017). After Europe. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lasch, C. (1969). The agony of the American left. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Lasch, C. (1977). Haven in a heartless world. The family besieged. New York: Basic Books.
Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of Narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Lilla, M. (2016). The end of identity liberalism. New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-identity-liberalism.html?_r=0
Lilla, M. (2017). The once and future liberal. After identity politics. New York: HarperCollins.
Lindsey, B., & Teles, S. (2017). The captured economy: How the powerful become richer, slow down growth, and increase inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lowles, N., & Painter, A. (2011). Fear and hope: The new politics of identity. London: Searchlight Trust.
Luce, E. (2017). The retreat of Western liberalism. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
Lynn, B. C. (2005). End of the line: The rise and coming fall of the global corporation. New York: Doubleday.
Lynn, B. C. (2010). Cornered: The new monopoly capitalism and the economics of destruction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Maurer, N. (2013). The empire trap: The rise and fall of US intervention to protect American property overseas (pp. 1893–2013). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Mearsheimer, J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77–89.
Milbank, J., & Pabst, A. (2016). The politics of virtue: Post-liberalism and the human future. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Murray, D. (2017). The strange death of Europe: Immigration, identity, Islam. London: Bloomsbury.
Niblett, R. (2017). Liberalism in retreat: The demise of a dream. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 17–24.
Northcott, M. S. (2004). An angel directs the storm: Apocalyptic religion and American Empire. London: I.B. Tauris.
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2017). Will the liberal order survive: The history of an idea. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 10–16.
Pabst, A. (2016a). Brexit, post-liberalism, and the politics of paradox. Telos, 176, 189–201.
Pabst, A. (2016b). Trump’s triumph: The failure of Clinton’s progressive politics and the demise of the liberal world order. Telos, 177, 192–197.
Pabst, A. (2017). Europe’s commonwealth: Greater Europe beyond core EU and economic Eurasia. In P. Schulze (Ed.), Core Europe and/or Greater Eurasia: Options for the future (pp. 71–93). Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
Pabst, A. (2018a). ‘War of position’: Liberal interregnum and the emergent ideologies. Telos, 183, 169–201.
Pabst, A. (2018b). Liberal world order and its critics: Civilisational states and cultural commonwealths. London: Routledge.
Pabst, A. (2019). The demons of liberal democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pew Research Center. (2015). The American middle class is losing ground: No longer the majority and falling behind financially. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/12/2015-12-09_middle-class_FINAL-report.pdf
Pfaff, W. (2010). The irony of manifest destiny: The tragedy of American Foreign Policy. New York: Walker & Company.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reeves, R. V. (2017). Dream Hoarders: How the American upper middle class is leaving everyone else in the dust, why that is a problem, and what to do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Reich, R. B. (1992). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st-century capitalism. New York: Vintage.
Reich, R. B. (2015). Friction is now between global financial elite and the rest of us. The Guardian. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/11/us-uk-politics-economics
Reynolds, D. (2013). The long shadow: The great war and the twentieth century. London: Simon & Schuster.
Rieff, D. (2002). A bed for the night: Humanitarianism in crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rieff, D. (2011). R2P, R.I.P. The New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/opinion/r2p-rip.html
Sakwa, R. (2014). Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: Bloomsbury.
Sakwa, R. (2016). How the Eurasian elites envisage the role of the EEU in global perspective. European Politics and Society, 17(suppl. 1), 4–22.
Sakwa, R. (2017). Russia against the rest: The post-Cold war crisis of world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scruton, R. (2003). The West and the rest: Globalisation and the terrorist threat. London: Continuum.
Strange, S. (1990). The name of the game. In N. X. Rizopoulous (Ed.), Sea changes: American Foreign policy in a world transformed (pp. 260–273). New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
Suskind, R. (2004). Faith, certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush. New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/faith-certainty-and-the-presidency-of-george-w-bush.html
The Social Mobility Commission. (2016, November). State of the nation 2016: Social mobility in Great Britain. London: Social Mobility Commission.
The Social Mobility Commission. (2017, November). State of the nation 2017: Social mobility in Great Britain. London: Social Mobility Commission.
Wæver, O. (1997). Imperial metaphors: Emerging European analogies to pre-nation-state imperial systems. In O. Tunander, P. Baev, & V. I. Einangel (Eds.), Geopolitics in post-wall Europe (pp. 59–93). London: Sage.
Yaqing, Q. (2011). The possibility and inevitability of a Chinese school of international relations theory. In W. A. Callahan & E. Barabantseva (Eds.), China orders the world: Normative soft power and foreign policy (pp. 37–53). Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zielonka, J. (2018). Counter-revolution. Liberal Europe in retreat. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pabst, A. (2020). Is Global Governance Unravelling? The Revolt Against Liberal Globalisation. In: Grigoryev, L., Pabst, A. (eds) Global Governance in Transformation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23092-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23092-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23091-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23092-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)