Abstract
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) performed by patients is a valuable tool in the design and execution of clinical trials in hypertension. In comparison with office blood pressure measurements, HBPM provides a much larger sample of measurements within days, weeks, or months, which are obtained in the usual environment of each individual and prevent several misrepresentative phenomena, such as white-coat and masked hypertension, the placebo effect and observer error and bias. These beneficial features lead to a more accurate definition of hypertension phenotypes and to more homogenous groups selected for clinical research. In addition, HBPM may yield higher reproducibility and improved sensitivity and precision in clinical trials that are designed to investigate circadian blood pressure characteristics, such as nocturnal hypertension, blood pressure variability, as well as long-term treatment-induced changes in blood pressure and in indexes of target organ damage and cardiovascular risk.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Stergiou GS, Ntineri A. Home (self) monitoring of blood pressure in clinical trials. In: White WB, editor. Blood pressure monitoring in cardiovascular medicine and therapeutics. Third edition. New York: Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22771-9.
Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, Bilo G, de Leeuw P, Imai Y, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the second international consensus conference on home blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2008;26(8):1505–26.
Stergiou GS, Baibas NM, Gantzarou AP, Skeva II, Kalkana CB, Roussias LG, et al. Reproducibility of home, ambulatory, and clinic blood pressure: implications for the design of trials for the assessment of antihypertensive drug efficacy. Am J Hypertens. 2002;15(2 Pt 1):101–4.
Ward AM, Takahashi O, Stevens R, Heneghan C. Home measurement of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Hypertens. 2012;30(3):449–56.
Bliziotis IA, Destounis A, Stergiou GS. Home versus ambulatory and office blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012;30(7):1289–99.
Nasothimiou EG, Karpettas N, Dafni MG, Stergiou GS. Patients’ preference for ambulatory versus home blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28(4):224–9.
Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, Obara T, Inoue R, Kikuya M, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes in the first trial of antihypertensive therapy guided by self-measured home blood pressure. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(11):1102–10.
Boubouchairopoulou N, Karpettas N, Athanasakis K, Kollias A, Protogerou AD, Achimastos A, et al. Cost estimation of hypertension management based on home blood pressure monitoring alone or combined office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8(10):732–8.
Mancia G, Facchetti R, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Effect of long-term antihypertensive treatment on white-coat hypertension. Hypertension. 2014;64(6):1388–98.
Nasothimiou EG, Tzamouranis D, Roussias LG, Stergiou GS. Home versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of clinic resistant and true resistant hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26(12):696–700.
Bhatt DL, Kandzari DE, O’Neill WW, D’Agostino R, Flack JM, Katzen BT, et al. A controlled trial of renal denervation for resistant hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(15):1393–401.
Mengden T, Binswanger B, Weisser B, Vetter W. An evaluation of self-measured blood pressure in a study with a calcium-channel antagonist versus a beta-blocker. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5(3):154–60.
Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Skeva II, Baibas NM, Kalkana CB, Mountokalakis TD. Assessment of drug effects on blood pressure and pulse pressure using clinic, home and ambulatory measurements. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16(10):729–35.
Vaur L, Dubroca II, Dutrey-Dupagne C, Genès N, Chatellier G, Bouvier-d’Yvoire M, et al. Superiority of home blood pressure measurements over office measurements for testing antihypertensive drugs. Blood Press Monit. 1998;3(2):107–14.
Mancia G, Omboni S, Chazova I, Coca A, Girerd X, Haller H, et al. Effects of the lercanidipine-enalapril combination vs. the corresponding monotherapies on home blood pressure in hypertension: evidence from a large database. J Hypertens. 2016;34(1):139–48.
Kario K, Hoshide S, Okawara Y, Tomitani N, Yamauchi K, Ohbayashi H, et al. Effect of canagliflozin on nocturnal home blood pressure in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the SHIFT-J study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018;20(10):1527–35.
Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Skeva II, Baibas NM, Roussias LG, Mountokalakis TD. Comparison of the smoothness index, the trough: peak ratio and the morning: evening ratio in assessing the features of the antihypertensive drug effect. J Hypertens. 2003;21(5):913–20.
Nishimura T, Hashimoto J, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Asayama K, et al. Efficacy and duration of action of the four selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blockers, losartan, candesartan, valsartan and telmisartan, in patients with essential hypertension determined by home blood pressure measurements. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2005;27(6):477–89.
Matsui Y, Eguchi K, Shibasaki S, Shimizu M, Ishikawa J, Shimada K, et al. Association between the morning-evening difference in home blood pressure and cardiac damage in untreated hypertensive patients. J Hypertens. 2009;27(4):712–20.
Metoki H, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Asayama K, Inoue R, Obara T, et al. The velocity of antihypertensive effect of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and angiotensin II receptor blocker. J Hypertens. 2012;30(7):1478–86.
Satoh M, Haga T, Hosaka M, Obara T, Metoki H, Murakami T, et al. The velocity of antihypertensive effects of seven angiotensin II receptor blockers determined by home blood pressure measurements. J Hypertens. 2016;34(6):1218–23.
Mori H, Yamamoto H, Ukai H, Yuasa S, Nakajima K, Mikawa T, et al. Comparison of effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker on morning home blood pressure and cardiorenal protection between morning administration and evening administration in hypertensive patients: the COMPATIBLE study. Hypertens Res. 2013;36(3):202–7.
Mengden T, Binswanger B, Spühler T, Weisser B, Vetter W. The use of self-measured blood pressure determinations in assessing dynamics of drug compliance in a study with amlodipine once a day, morning versus evening. J Hypertens. 1993;11(12):1403–11.
Hashimoto J, Chonan K, Aoki Y, Ugajin T, Yamaguchi J, Nishimura T, et al. Therapeutic effects of evening administration of guanabenz and clonidine on morning hypertension: evaluation using home-based blood pressure measurements. J Hypertens. 2003;21(4):805–11.
Kario K, Hoshide S, Shimizu M, Yano Y, Eguchi K, Ishikawa J, et al. Effect of dosing time of angiotensin II receptor blockade titrated by self-measured blood pressure recordings on cardiorenal protection in hypertensives: the Japan morning surge-target organ protection (J-TOP) study. J Hypertens. 2010;28(7):1574–83.
Karpettas N, Destounis A, Kollias A, Nasothimiou E, Moyssakis I, Stergiou GS. Prediction of treatment-induced changes in target-organ damage using changes in clinic, home and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertens Res. 2014;37(6):543–7.
Mancia G, Zanchetti A, Agabiti-Rosei E, Benemio G, De Cesaris R, Fogari R, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE study group. Study on ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure and Lisinopril evaluation. Circulation. 1997;95(6):1464–70.
Kjeldsen SE, Hedner T, Jamerson K, Julius S, Haley WE, Zabalgoitia M, et al. Hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) study: home blood pressure in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 1998;31(4):1014–20.
Kario K, Saito I, Kushiro T, Teramukai S, Ishikawa Y, Mori Y, et al. Home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients during antihypertensive therapy: primary results of HONEST, a large-scale prospective, real-world observational study. Hypertension. 2014;64(5):989–96.
Stergiou GS, Ntineri A, Kollias A, Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Parati G. Blood pressure variability assessed by home measurements: a systematic review. Hypertens Res. 2014;37(6):565–72.
Ishikura K, Obara T, Kato T, Kikuya M, Shibamiya T, Shinki T, et al. Associations between day-by-day variability in blood pressure measured at home and antihypertensive drugs: the J-HOME-morning study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2012;34(4):297–304.
Matsui Y, O’Rourke MF, Hoshide S, Ishikawa J, Shimada K, Kario K. Combined effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker and either a calcium channel blocker or diuretic on day-by-day variability of home blood pressure: the Japan combined treatment with olmesartan and a calcium-channel blocker versus olmesartan and diuretics randomized efficacy study. Hypertension. 2012;59(6):1132–8.
Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Hanazawa T, Watabe D, Hosaka M, Satoh M, et al. Does antihypertensive drug class affect day-to-day variability of self-measured home blood pressure? The HOMED-BP study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(3):e002995.
Hoshide S, Yano Y, Shimizu M, Eguchi K, Ishikawa J, Kario K. Is home blood pressure variability itself an interventional target beyond lowering mean home blood pressure during anti-hypertensive treatment? Hypertens Res. 2012;35(8):862–6.
Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Obara T, Metoki H, Inoue R, et al. Prediction of stroke by home “morning” versus “evening” blood pressure values: the Ohasama study. Hypertension. 2006;48(4):737–43.
Stergiou GS, Nasothimiou EG, Roussias LG. Morning hypertension assessed by home or ambulatory monitoring: different aspects of the same phenomenon? J Hypertens. 2010;28(9):1846–53.
Stergiou G, Parati G. Further insights into the 24-h blood pressure profile by home blood pressure monitoring: the issue of morning hypertension. J Hypertens. 2009;27(4):696–9.
Redon J, Bilo G, Parati G, Surge Steering Committee. The effects of telmisartan alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide on morning home blood pressure control: the SURGE 2 practice-based study. Blood Press. 2013;22(6):377–85.
Kario K, Saito I, Kushiro T, Teramukai S, Ishikawa Y, Hiramatsu K, et al. Effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist olmesartan on morning home blood pressure in hypertension: HONEST study at 16 weeks. J Hum Hypertens. 2013;27(12):721–8.
Asayama K, Fujiwara T, Hoshide S, Ohkubo T, Kario K, Stergiou GS, et al. Nocturnal blood pressure measured by home devices: evidence and perspective for clinical application. J Hypertens. 2019;37(5):905–16.
Kollias A, Ntineri A, Stergiou GS. Association of night-time home blood pressure with night-time ambulatory blood pressure and target-organ damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017;35(3):442–52.
Alfie J. Utility of home blood pressure monitoring to evaluate postprandial blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;9(4):133–9.
Beeftink MM, Spiering W, Bots ML, Verloop WL, De Jager RL, Sanders MF, et al. Renal denervation in a real life setting: a gradual decrease in home blood pressure. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ntineri, A., Kario, K., Wang, JG., White, W., Stergiou, G.S. (2020). Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinical Research. In: Stergiou, G., Parati, G., Mancia, G. (eds) Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. Updates in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23065-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23065-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23064-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23065-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)