Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reoperation After Robotic Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Assisted Hernia Repair

  • 349 Accesses

Abstract

There is not much literature regarding reoperation after robotic diaphragmatic hernia repair. Because robotic technology use in foregut surgery is increasing, more patients will require reoperation. Until more studies offer guidelines for treatment of patients requiring reoperation after robotic diaphragmatic hernia repair, principles derived from laparoscopic experience with antireflux repairs and reoperations can be applied. This chapter discusses the rationale and indications for reoperation after robotic diaphragmatic hernia repair and provides surgeons with suggestions for operative management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, Reardon PR, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD, et al. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2647–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1267-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Draaisma WA, Buskens E, Bais JE, Simmermacher RK, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Broeders IA, et al. Randomized clinical trial and follow-up study of cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg. 2006;93:690–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6:125–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morino M, Pellegrino L, Giaccone C, Garrone C, Rebecchi F. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg. 2006;93:553–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, Bintintan VV, Koninger J, Buchler MW, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1800–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9268-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Mehrabi A, Wente MN, Fischer L, Koninger J, et al. No relevant difference in quality of life and functional outcome at 12 months’ follow-up-a randomised controlled trial comparing robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2009;394:441–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0446-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rebecchi F, Allaix ME, Morino M. Robotic technological aids in esophageal surgery. J Visc Surg. 2017;3:7. https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2017.01.09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen JS, Antonsen HK, Durup J. Two years of experience with robot-assisted anti-reflux surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2017;39:260–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Failure of antireflux surgery: causes and management strategies. Am J Surg. 1996;171:36–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80070-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Awais O, Luketich JD, Schuchert MJ, Morse CR, Wilson J, Gooding WE, et al. Reoperative antireflux surgery for failed fundoplication: an analysis of outcomes in 275 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1083–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elmously A, Gray KD, Ullmann TM, Fahey TJ, Afaneh C, Zarnegar R. Robotic reoperative anti-reflux surgery: low perioperative morbidity and high symptom resolution. World J Surg. 2018;42(12):4014–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4708-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceccarelli G, Patriti A, Biancafarina A, Spaziani A, Bartoli A, Bellochi R, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Eur Surg Res. 2009;43:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1159/000223751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sle.0000213756.76761.b7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakadi IE, Melot C, Closset J, DeMoor V, Betroune K, Feron P, et al. Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg. 2006;30:1050–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7950-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA. Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:33–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0558-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC, USA

    Jordan A. Bilezikian, Robert G. Johnson, W. Borden Hooks III & William W. Hope

Authors
  1. Jordan A. Bilezikian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert G. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Borden Hooks III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William W. Hope
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan A. Bilezikian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Our Lady of the Lake Physician Group, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

    Karl A. LeBlanc

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bilezikian, J.A., Johnson, R.G., Borden Hooks, W., Hope, W.W. (2019). Reoperation After Robotic Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair. In: LeBlanc, K. (eds) Robotic Assisted Hernia Repair. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23025-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23025-8_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23024-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23025-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation