Skip to main content

Classroom 4.0: Understanding the New Battleground

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 811 Accesses

Abstract

The classroom of today is emerging as a new battleground between the teachers and the students. With a new generation of tech-savvy students—the teachers are facing a complex battle trying to impose the older “chalk and talk” methodology in the face of multiple sources of information. The new generation—increasingly born after 1990s—is extremely reliant on various digital tools for day-to-day work including learning. This has brought the teacher into direct conflict with Google and Wikipedia which are regarded as more learned than the person delivering the knowledge in the classroom. The rising social and digital tensions have made the classroom more of a battlefield with the traditional mode of learning and teaching fighting a losing battle against the new waves of digital invaders. This chapter proposes to look at how the students perceive the new classroom and what role does the various platforms play in terms of classroom interaction. Data for the research was collected from 198 students from various business schools. Exploratory factor analysis using parallel analysis was employed to understand the underlying dimensions and the interrelationships between them. An attempt was also made at using confirmatory factor analysis to understand the dynamics of the relationships. Four dimensions were identified and the paper tries to synthesize the outcomes with classroom teaching and learning in the Indian context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bearison, D. J., & Dorval, B. (2002). Constructive features of collaborative cognition collaborative cognition: Children negotiating ways of knowing (pp. 117–121). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R., & Pearce, G. (2009). Educational drama: A tool for promoting marketing learning? International Journal of Management Education, 8(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well known but poorly understood. Organisational Research Methods, 18, 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1987). Teaching and the case method. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. H., Rogers, D. P., & Harris, M. B. (2006). International engineering students: Avoiding plagiarism through understanding the western academic context of scholarship. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteve, J. M. (2000). The transformation of the teachers’ role at the end of the twentieth century: New challenges for the future. Educational Review, 52(2), 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, T., & Pontrich, P. R. (1996). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gönül, F. F., & Solano, R. A. (2013). Innovative teaching: An empirical study of computer-aided instruction in quantitative business courses. Journal of Statistics Education, 21(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-learning pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. S. (2002). Learning by the case method Case No. 9-376-241. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetzel, R. D. (1996). A primer on factor analysis with comments on patterns of practise and reporting. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 4, pp. 175–206). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K. (2005). Management education and case method as a pedagogy. Vikalpa, 30(1), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakka, S. R., & Mantha, S. R. (2012). Case study method of teaching in management education. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 1(3), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamovi Project. (2018). Jamovi (Version 0.9.2.8). Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org

  • Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J., & Haas, J. (2009). The instructional powers of digital games, social networks and simulations and how teachers can leverage them (p. 23). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulathuramaiyer, N., & Maurer, H. (2008). Learning ecosystems for dealing with the copy-paste syndrome. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 1(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor analyse your data right: Do’s, dont’s and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, H., Kappe, F., & Zaka, B. (2006). Plagiarism: A survey. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12(8), 1050–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, K. (2017, June 7). The ultimate history of technology in education. Retrieved November 16, 2018, from http://www.ourict.co.uk/technology-education-history/

  • Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in healthcare research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. (1996). The use of cases in management education Case No. 9-376-240. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 76, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D., & Fajardo, C. (2008). Adding voice/visual interaction to online classes. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 1(1), 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B. (1985). Hints for case teaching Case No. 9-585-012. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear, L., Novais, G., & Moorthy, S. (2010). Innovative teaching and learning research: Executive summary. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tserendorj, N., Tudevdagva, U., & Heller, A. (2012). Integration of learning management system into university-level teaching and learning. Chemnitz, Germany: Chemnitz University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. (2006). Das Google-copy-paste-syndrome (2008th ed.). Hannover: Heise Heinz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. R. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rohit Vishal Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, R.V. (2020). Classroom 4.0: Understanding the New Battleground. In: Rajagopal, Behl, R. (eds) Innovation, Technology, and Market Ecosystems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23010-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics