Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Low-Pressure Dynamic Compression Response of Porous Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shock Phenomena in Granular and Porous Materials

Part of the book series: Shock Wave and High Pressure Phenomena ((SHOCKWAVE))

  • 1124 Accesses

Abstract

At low pressures, of the same order as the strength of the underlying material, the removal of porosity is the dominant aspect controlling the behavior of shock-loaded porous materials. In this chapter, we discuss experimental approaches used in this regime including sample configuration and characterization, instrumentation, and error analyses for the results. We follow this with discussion of modeling approaches utilized at both the continuum and the mesoscale. Building upon these fundamentals, we consider several phenomena that are specific to the low-pressure dynamic behavior of porous materials. Finally, we discuss some of the outstanding issues in the behavior and treatment of porous materials in this regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grady D, Fenton G, Vogler T (2014) Equation of state for shock compression of distended solids. J Phys. Conf Ser 500(11):152007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fredenburg DA, Koller DD (2014) Interpreting the shock response of porous oxide systems. J Phys Conf Ser 500(11):112025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nesterenko VF (2001) Dynamics of heterogeneous materials. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Fredenburg DA, Thadhani NN, Vogler TJ (2010) Shock consolidation of nanocrystalline 6061-T6 aluminum powders. Mater Sci Eng A 527:3349–3357

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown JL, Vogler TJ, Grady DE, Reinhart WD, Chhabildas LC, Thornhill TF (2007) Dynamic compaction of sand. In: Elert M, Furnish MD, Chau R, Holmes N, Nguyen J (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter - 2007. AIP, New York, pp 1363–1366

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vogler TJ, Lee MY, Grady DE (2007) Static and dynamic compaction of ceramic powders. Int J Solids Struct 44:636–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheffield SA, Gustavsen RL, Anderson MU (1997) Shock loading of porous high explosives. In: Davison L, Horie Y, Shahinpoor M (eds) High-pressure shock compression of solids IV: response of highly porous solids to shock loading. Springer, New York, pp 23–61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Trott WM, Baer MR, Castañeda JN, Chhabildas LC, Asay JR (2007) Investigation of the mesoscopic scale response of low-density pressings of granular sugar under impact. J Appl Phys 101:024917

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang R, Zou R, Yu A (2003) Effect of material properties on the packing of fine particles. J Appl Phys 94:3025–3034

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fredenburg DA, Koller DD, Rigg PA, Scharff RJ (2013) High-fidelity Hugoniot analysis of porous materials. Rev Sci Instrum 84:013903

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2008) Mesoscale calculations of the dynamic behavior of a granular ceramic. Int J Solids Struct 45:1676–1696

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Benson DJ (1995) The calculation of the shock velocity - particle velocity relationship for a copper powder by direct numerical simulation. Wave Motion 21:85–99

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Schumaker MG, Kennedy G, Thadhani NN, Hankin M, Stewart ST, Borg JP (2017) Stress and temperature distributions of individual particles in a shock wave propagating through dry and wet sand mixtures. AIP Conf Proc 1793:120016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaeger HM (2005) Sand, jams and jets. Phys World 18:34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliot NE, Staudhammer KP (1992) Effect of internal gas pressure on the shock consolidation of 304 stainless steel powders. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 371–381

    Google Scholar 

  16. McQueen RG, Marsh SP, Taylor JW, Fritz JN, Carter WJ (1970) The equation of state of solids from shock wave studies. In: Kinslow R (ed) High-velocity impact phenomena. Academic, New York, pp 293–417

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Yiannakopoulos G (1990) A review of manganin gauge technology for measurements in the gigapascal range. Tech. Rep. MRL-TR-90-5, Materials Research Labs Ascot Vale, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer F (1982) Behavior of ferroelectric ceramics and PVF2 polymers under shock loading. In: Nellis WJ, Seaman L, Graham RA (eds) Shock waves in condensed matter - 1981. AIP, New York, pp 251–266

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barker LM, Hollenbach RE (1972) Laser interferometry for measuring high velocities for any reflecting surface. J Appl Phys 43:4669–4675

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Strand OT, Goosman DR, Martinez C, Whitworth TL, Kuhlow WW (2006) Compact system for high-speed velocimetry using heterodyne techniques. Rev Sci Instrum 77:083108

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eakins DE, Thadhani NN (2009) Shock compression of reactive powder mixtures. Int Mater Rev 54:181–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Borg JP, Chapman DJ, Tsembelis K, Proud WG, Cogar JR (2005) Dynamic compaction of porous silica powder. J Appl Phys 98:073509

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dai C, Eakins DE, Thadhani NN (2007) On the applicability of analytical models to predict Hugoniot of nano-sized powder compacts. In: Elert M, Furnish MD, Chau R, Holmes N, Nguyen J (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter - 2007. AIP, New York, pp 35–38

    Google Scholar 

  24. Razorenov SV, Kanel GI, Baumung K, Bluhm HJ (2002) elastic limit and spall strength of aluminum and copper single crystals over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures. In: shock compression of condensed matter - 2001. AIP, New York, pp 503–506

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barker LM, Hollenbach RE (1974) Shock wave study of the alpha to epsilon phase transition in iron. J Appl Phys 45:4872

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fredenburg DA, Koller DD, Coe JD, Kiyanda CB (2014) The influence of morphology on the low- and high-strain-rate compaction response of CeO2 powders. J Appl Phys 115:123511

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barker LM, Hollenbach RE (1970) Shock-wave studies of PMMA, fused silica, and sapphire. J Appl Phys 41:4208–4226

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baer MR, Trott WM (2004) Mesoscale studies of shock loaded tin sphere lattices. In: Furnish MD, Gupta YM, Forbes JW (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter. American Institute of Physics, New York, pp 517–520

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell AC, Nellis WJ (1981) Shock compression of aluminum, copper, and tantalum. J Appl Phys 52:3363–3374

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Root S, Haill TA, Lane JMD, Thompson AP, Grest GS, Schroen DG, Mattsson TR (2013) Shock compression of hydrocarbon foam to 200 GPa: experiments, atomistic simulations, and mesoscale hydrodynamic modeling. J Appl Phys 114:103502

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Boade RR (1968) Compression of porous copper by shock waves. J Appl Phys 39:5693–5702

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang Z, Aidun JB (2009) Combined compression and shear plane waves. In: Horie Y (ed) Shock wave science and technology reference library, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 109–167

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sairam S, Clifton RJ (1994) Pressure-shear impact investigation of dynamic fragmentation and flow of ceramics. In: Gilat A (ed) Mechanical testing of ceramics and ceramic composites. AMD, vol 197. ASME, New York, pp 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vogler TJ, Alexander CS, Thornhill TF, Reinhart WD (2011) Pressure-shear experiments on granular materials. Report SAND2011-6700, Sandia National Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  35. LaJeunesse JW (2018) Dynamic behavior of granular earth materials subjected to pressure-shear loading. Ph.D. thesis, Marquette University, Department of Mechanical Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vogler TJ (2015) Shock wave perturbation decay in granular materials. J Dyn Behav Mater 1:370–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Carton EP, Verbeek HJ, Stuivinga M, Schoonman J (1997) Dynamic compaction of powders by an oblique detonation wave in the cylindrical configuration. J Appl Phys 81:3038–3045

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Thadhani NN (1988) Shock compression of powders. Adv Mater Manuf Process 3:493–549

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jin ZQ, Thadhani NN, McGill M, Ding Y, Wang ZL, Chen M, Zeng H, Chakka VM, Liu JP (2005) Explosive shock processing of Pr2Fe14B/α-Fe exchange-coupled nanocomposite bulk magnets. J Mater Res 20:599–609

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sethi G, Myers NS, German RM (2008) An overview of dynamic compaction in powder metallurgy. Int Mater Rev 53:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nesterenko VF, Meyers MA, Chen HC (1996) Shear localization in high-strain-rate deformation of granular alumina. Acta Mater 44:2017–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shih CJ, Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF (1998) High-strain-rate deformation of granular silicon carbide. Acta Mater 46:4037–4065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fenton G, Caipen T, Daehn G, Vogler T, Grady D (2009) Shock-less high rate compaction of porous brittle materials. In: Elert ML, Buttler WT, Furnish MD, Anderson WW, Proud WG (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter - 2009. AIP, New York, pp 1337–1340

    Google Scholar 

  44. Herrmann W (1969) Constitutive equations for the dynamic compaction of ductile porous materials. J Appl Phys 40:2490–2499

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Carroll M, Holt AC (1972) Suggested modification of the p-alpha model for porous materials. J Appl Phys 43:759–761

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Butcher BM, Karnes CH (1969) Dynamic compaction of porous iron. J Appl Phys 40:2967–2976

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Carroll M, Holt AC (1974) Shock-wave compaction of porous aluminum. J Appl Phys 45:3864–3875

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fredenburg DA, Thadhani NN (2013) On the applicability of the p-alpha and p-lambda models to describe the dynamic compaction response of highly heterogeneous powder mixtures. J Appl Phys 113:043507

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Boade RR (1970) Principal Hugoniot, second-shock Hugoniot, and release behavior of pressed copper powder. J Appl Phys 41:4542–4551

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Grady DE, Winfree NA, Kerley GI, Wilson LT, Kuhns LD (2000) Computational modeling and wave propagation in media with inelastic deforming microstructure. J Phys IV 10:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  51. Grady DE, Winfree NA (2001) A computational model for polyurethane foam. In: Staudhammer KP, Murr LE, Meyers MA (eds) Fundamental issues and applications of shock-wave and high-strain-rate phenomena. Elsevier, New York, pp 485–491

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fenton G, Grady D, Vogler T (2015) Shock compression modeling of distended mixtures. J Dyn Behav Mater 1:103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Collins GS, Melosh HJ, Wunneman K (2011) Improvements to the 𝜖-α porous compaction model for simulating impacts into high-porosity solar system objects. Int J Impact Eng 38:434–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wunnemann K, Collins GS, Melosh HJ (2006) A strain-based porosity model for use in hydrocode simulations of impacts and implications for transient crater growth in porous targets. Icarus 180:514–527

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Bland PA, Collins GS, Davison TM, Abreu NM, Ciesla FJ, Muxworthy AR, Moore J (2014) Pressure-temperature evolution of primordial solar systems during impact-induced compaction. Nat Commun 5:5451

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Davison TM, Collins GS, Bland PA (2016) Mesoscale modeling of impact compaction of primitive solar system models. Astrophys J 821:68

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Benson DJ (1997) The numerical simulation of the dynamic compaction of powders. In: Davison L, Horie Y, Shahinpoor M (eds) High-pressure shock compression of solids IV: response of highly porous solids to shock loading. Springer, New York, pp 233–255

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2008) Mesoscale simulations of a dart penetrating sand. Int J Impact Eng 35:1435–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dwivedi SK, Teeter RD, Felice CW, Gupta YM (2008) Two dimensional mesoscale simulations of projectile instability during penetration in dry sand. J Appl Phys 104:083502

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Homel MA, Herbold EB (2017) On mesoscale methods to enhance full-stress continuum modeling of porous compaction. In: Chau R, Germann T, Oleynik I, Peiris S, Ravelo R, Sewell T (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter - 2015, vol 1793. AIP, New York, p 080010

    Google Scholar 

  61. Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2013) Rapid compaction of granular materials: characterizing two and three-dimensional mesoscale simulations. Shock Waves 23:153–176

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lajeunesse JW, Hankin M, Kennedy GB, Spaulding DK, Schumaker MG, Neel CH, Borg JP, Stewart ST, Thadhani NN (2017) Dynamic response of dry and water-saturated sand systems. J Appl Phys 112:015901

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2009) Aspects of simulating the dynamic compaction of a granular ceramic. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:045003

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Baer MR (2007) Mesoscale modeling of shocks in heterogeneous reactive materials. In: Horie Y (ed) Shock wave science and technology reference library. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 321–356

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Benson DJ, Conley P (1999) Eulerian finite-element simulations of experimentally acquired HMX microstructures. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 7:333–354

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Eakins D, Thadhani NN (2007) Discrete particle simulation of shock wave propagation in a binary Ni+Al powder mixture. J Appl Phys 101:043508

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. McGlaun JM, Thompson SL, Elrick MG (1990) CTH: a three-dimensional shock wave physics code. Int J Impact Eng 10:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Williamson RL (1990) Parametric studies of dynamic powder consolidation using a particle-level numerical model. J Appl Phys 68:1287–1296

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Derrick JG, LaJeunesse JW, Davison TM, Borg JP, Collins GS (2018) Mesoscale simulations of shock compaction of a granular ceramic: effects of mesostructure and mixed-cell strength treatment. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 26:035009

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Borg JP, Maines WR, Chhabildas LC (2014) Equation of state and isentropic release of aluminum foam and polyvinylidene fluoride systems. J Appl Phys 115:213515

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Dwivedi SK, Pei L, Teeter RD (2015) Two-dimensional mesoscale simulations of shock response of dry sand. J Appl Phys 117:085902

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Xi CQ, Li QM (2017) Meso-scale mechanism of compaction shock propagation in cellular materials. Int J Impact Eng 109:321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Labanda NA, Giusti SM, Luccioni BM (2018) Meso-scale fracture simulation using an augmented Lagrangian approach. Int J Damage Mech 27:138–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Gunkelmann N, Rosandi Y, Ruestes CJ, Bringa EM, Urbassek HM (2016) Compaction and plasticity in nanofoams induced by shock waves: a molecular dynamics study. Comput Mater Sci 119:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Banlusan K, Strachan A (2016) Shockwave energy dissipation in metal-organic framework MOF-5. J Phys Chem C 120:12463–12471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Cheruka MJ, Germann TC, Kober EM, Strachan A (2014) Shock loading of granular Ni/Al composites. Part I: mechanics of loading. J Phys Chem C 118:26377–26386

    Google Scholar 

  77. Lane JMD, Thompson AP, Vogler TJ (2014) Enhanced densification under shock compression in porous silicon. Phys Rev B 90:134311

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. Brar NS, Rosenberg Z, Bless SJ (1992) Applying Steinberg’s model to the Hugoniot elastic limit of porous boron carbide specimens. In: Schmidt SC, Dick RD, Forbes JW, Tasker DG (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 467–470

    Google Scholar 

  79. Neal WD, Chapman DJ, Proud WG (2012) Shock-wave stability in quasi-mono-disperse granular materials. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 57:31001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. Tong W, Ravichandran G (1997) Recent developments in modeling shock compression of porous materials. In: Davison L, Horie Y, Shahinpoor M (eds) High-pressure shock compression of solids IV: response of highly porous solids to shock loading. Springer, New York, pp 177–203

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  81. Swegle JW, Grady DE (1985) Shock viscosity and the prediction of shock wave rise times. J Appl Phys 58:692–701

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Zhuang S, Ravichandran G, Grady DE (2003) An experimental investigation of shock wave propagation in periodically layered composites. J Mech Phys Solids 51:245–265

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. Vogler TJ, Borg JP, Grady DE (2012) On the scaling of steady structured waves in heterogeneous materials. J Appl Phys 112:123507

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Zel’dovich YaB, Raizer YuP (2002) Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena. Dover, Mineola, NY

    Google Scholar 

  85. Bakanova AA, Dudoladov IP, Sutulov YN (1974) Shock compressibility of porous tungsten, molybdenum, copper, and aluminum in the low pressure domain. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 15:241–245

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. Boade RR (1969) Dynamic compression of porous tungsten. J Appl Phys 40:3781–3785

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. Dandekar DP, Lamothe RM (1977) Behavior of porous tungsten under shock compression at room temperature. J Appl Phys 48:2871–2897

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. Crockett S (2017) Sesame equation of state 93540. SESAME Database

    Google Scholar 

  89. Grady DE (2010) Length scales and size distributions in dynamic fragmentation. Int J Fract 163:85–99

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Davison L, Horie Y, Shahinpoor M (eds) (1997) High-pressure shock compression of solids IV: response of highly porous solids to shock loading. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  91. Krehl POK (2015) The classical Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions, an important cornerstone of modern shock wave physics: ideal assumptions vs. reality. Eur Phys J H 40:159–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. Lagunov VA, Stepanov VA (1963) Measurements of the dynamic compressibility of sand. Zhurnal Prikladnoi Mekhaniki i Tehknicheskoi Fiziki 4:88–96

    Google Scholar 

  94. Zaretsky E, Asaf Z, Ran E, Aizik F (2012) Impact response of high density flexible polyurethane foam. Int J Impact Eng 39:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Barnes AT, Ravi-Chandar K, Kyriakides S, Gaitanaros S (2014) Dynamic crushing of aluminum foams: part I - experiments. Int J Solids Struct 51:1631–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. Los Alamos National Laboratory is managed by Triad National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy’s NNSA under contract number 89233218CNA000001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA

    D. Anthony Fredenburg

  2. Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, USA

    Tracy J. Vogler

Authors
  1. D. Anthony Fredenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracy J. Vogler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy J. Vogler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, USA

    Tracy J. Vogler

  2. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA

    D. Anthony Fredenburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fredenburg, D.A., Vogler, T.J. (2019). Low-Pressure Dynamic Compression Response of Porous Materials. In: Vogler, T., Fredenburg, D. (eds) Shock Phenomena in Granular and Porous Materials. Shock Wave and High Pressure Phenomena. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23002-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation