Skip to main content

A Fault-Driven Combinatorial Process for Model Evolution in XSS Vulnerability Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice (IEA/AIE 2019)

Abstract

We consider the case where a knowledge base consists of interactions among parameter values in an input parameter model for web application security testing. The input model gives rise to attack strings to be used for exploiting XSS vulnerabilities, a critical threat towards the security of web applications. Testing results are then annotated with a vulnerability triggering or non-triggering classification, and such security knowledge findings are added back to the knowledge base, making the resulting attack capabilities superior for newly requested input models. We present our approach as an iterative process that evolves an input model for security testing. Empirical evaluation on six real-world web application shows that the process effectively evolves a knowledge base for XSS vulnerability detection, achieving on average 78.8% accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    PhantomJS (http://phantomjs.org/) is a headless browser environment enabling introspection of events such as network requests, document edits and JavaScript errors.

  2. 2.

    In theory, any valid JavaScript functions that will not be called during the normal operation of the SUT can be chosen instead.

  3. 3.

    Note that \(t_{BEN}\) is different from the strength t for generating the initial test suite.

  4. 4.

    In this case, we believe that the suspiciousness average and standard deviation could be useful indicators of the \(F_1\) score that the currently inferred model may have.

  5. 5.

    WAVSEP: Web Application Vulnerability Scanner Evaluation Project, https://github.com/sectooladdict/wavsep.

  6. 6.

    The tests suites were generated using the IpoF algorithm, implemented in ACTS.

References

  1. Arcaini, P., Gargantini, A., Radavelli, M.: Efficient and guaranteed detection of t-way failure-inducing combinations. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation ICST Workshops (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bozic, J., Garn, B., Kapsalis, I., Simos, D., Winkler, S., Wotawa, F.: Attack pattern-based combinatorial testing with constraints for web security testing. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Catteddu, D.: Cloud computing: benefits, risks and recommendations for information security. In: Serrão, C., Aguilera Díaz, V., Cerullo, F. (eds.) IBWAS 2009. CCIS, vol. 72, pp. 17–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16120-9_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Duchene, F., Groz, R., Rawat, S., Richier, J.-L.: XSS vulnerability detection using model inference assisted evolutionary fuzzing. In IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pp. 815–817 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. Foundation: OWASP Top 10 2017. https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10-2017_A7-Cross-Site_Scripting_(XSS). Accessed 19 Apr 2018

  6. Gargantini, A., Petke, J., Radavelli, M.: Combinatorial interaction testing for automated constraint repair. In: IEEE International Confernce on Software Testing, Verification and Validation ICST Workshops, pp. 239–248 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gargantini, A., Radavelli, M.: Migrating combinatorial interaction test modeling and generation to the web. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation ICST Workshops, pp. 308–317 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garn, B., Kapsalis, I., Simos, D.E., Winkler, S.: On the applicability of combinatorial testing to web application security testing: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Joining AcadeMiA and Industry Contributions to Test Automation and Model-Based Testing, pp. 16–21. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghandehari, L.S., Lei, Y., Kacker, R., Kuhn, D.R.R., Kung, D., Xie, T.: A combinatorial testing-based approach to fault localization. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jia, Y., Cohen, M.B., Harman, M., Petke, J.: Learning combinatorial interaction test generation strategies using hyperheuristic search. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1, ICSE 2015, pp. 540–550 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhn, D., Kacker, R., Lei, Y.: Introduction to Combinatorial Testing. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Melicher, W., Das, A., Sharif, M., Bauer, L., Jia, L.: Riding out DOMsday: towards detecting and preventing DOM cross-site scripting. In: Proceedings of Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. Internet Society (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simos, D.E., Kleine, K., Ghandehari, L.S.G., Garn, B., Lei, Y.: A combinatorial approach to analyzing cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in web application security testing. In: Wotawa, F., Nica, M., Kushik, N. (eds.) ICTSS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9976, pp. 70–85. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47443-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Simos, D.E., Kuhn, R., Voyiatzis, A.G., Kacker, R.: Combinatorial methods in security testing. IEEE Comput. 49, 40–43 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Temple, P., Galindo, J.A., Acher, M., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Using machine learning to infer constraints for product lines. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Systems and Software Product Line Conference, pp. 209–218. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, L., Lei, Y., Kacker, R.N., Kuhn, D.R.: ACTS: a combinatorial test generation tool. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Radavelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garn, B., Radavelli, M., Gargantini, A., Leithner, M., Simos, D.E. (2019). A Fault-Driven Combinatorial Process for Model Evolution in XSS Vulnerability Detection. In: Wotawa, F., Friedrich, G., Pill, I., Koitz-Hristov, R., Ali, M. (eds) Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice. IEA/AIE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11606. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22999-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22999-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22998-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22999-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics