Skip to main content

Representations of Natural Numbers and Computability of Various Functions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11558))

Abstract

We discuss various ways of representing natural numbers in computations. We are primarily concerned with their computational properties, i.e. which functions each of these representations allows us to compute. We show that basic functions, such as successor, addition, multiplication and exponentiation are largely computationally independent from each other, which means that in most cases computability of one of them in a certain representation does not imply that others will be computable in it as well.

We also examine what difference can be made if we restrict our attention only to those representations in which it is decidable whether two numerals represent the same number. It turns out that the impact of such restriction is huge and that it allows us to rule out representations with certain unusual properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The algorithm which is supposed to find out whether \(n \in A\) will have answers for \(n \in \{0,1\}\) explicitly given as special cases.

References

  1. Copeland, B.J., Proudfoot, D.: Deviant encodings and Turing’s analysis of computability. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part A 41(3), 247–252 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Quinon, P.: A taxonomy of deviant encodings. In: Manea, F., Miller, R.G., Nowotka, D. (eds.) CiE 2018. LNCS, vol. 10936, pp. 338–348. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94418-0_34

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Rescorla, M.: Church’s thesis and the conceptual analysis of computability. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 48(2), 253–280 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Shapiro, S.: Acceptable notation. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 23(1), 14–20 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wrocławski, M.: Representing Numbers. Filozofia Nauki 26(4), 57–73 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michał Wrocławski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wrocławski, M. (2019). Representations of Natural Numbers and Computability of Various Functions. In: Manea, F., Martin, B., Paulusma, D., Primiero, G. (eds) Computing with Foresight and Industry. CiE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11558. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22996-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22996-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22995-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22996-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics