Skip to main content

Making Informal Social Control Happen: Empirical Findings on Collective Efficacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Latin American Studies Book Series ((LASBS))

Abstract

Chapter 3 analyzed social network density in three barrios of Caracas: Catia/23 de Enero (henceforth, Catia) , Petare , and Santa Cruz del Este /Minas de Baruta (henceforth, Baruta). It found that social network density was high in all three studied barrios. Such findings point toward some structural composition of social capital present in all the studied barrios . This factor of social capital is necessary for social capital to exist, as it lowers transaction costs of organization-building toward goals like imparting informal social control . The present chapter contributes to the discussion on social capital’s structural composition, and its moderating role of urban violence, by analyzing its second structural factor, collective efficacy , in these three studied barrios. However, two sub-factors compose collective efficacy: Social disorganization and collective action within the institutional context. This chapter shows that high social disorganization does not correspond with high violence rates. Hence, it is an irrelevant sub-factor of social capital. Regarding collective action within the institutional context, the chapter shows that in all the barrios attempts at collective action were not sustainable, likely because of rent-seeking organizations’ presence. This chapter found that only in the barrio of Baruta was there evidence of sustainable collective action. However, the evidence presented has some limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    CDIs are somewhat controversial. They provide only basic healthcare services and are usually staffed by undertrained physicians, many of them from Cuba. However, they provide healthcare services near within barrios , which increases the reach of this service at no costs. The data collected for this book shows that in many cases they are the only available source of medical services, even if their medical services were of limited quality.

  2. 2.

    In English: “Here [in Caracas] you get to see [to earn] more money”.

  3. 3.

    In English: “the street of the gochos”. Gocho is a Venezuelan term—sometimes used pejoratively—used to describe people from the Venezuelan Andes. This term, and its pejorative use, was originally a label for supporters and henchmen of Venezuela’s longtime caudillo, General Juan Vicente Gomez , who came from Tachira state in the Venezuelan Andes. It gains a pejorative normative charge because Gomez only appointed people from his native state to positions of power. In fact, the process of democratization after 1958 was a process of getting rid of Andeans from power networks since Venezuela’s caudillos for more than half a century were all from the Venezuelan Andes (Bruni-Celli, 19 May 2016) .

  4. 4.

    The use of the verb “squat” has a rather strong negative normative charge. However, it is the appropriate translation for the verb used by the interviewed subject, “invadir.” The referred squatters, due to the time frame of the events, are likely barrio-dwellers from coastal towns not too far away from Caracas displaced by the torrential rains of late 2010. This interview partner elaborated that, “aquí se organizan…entre ellos mismos se organizaron, ellos no son nada, ellos no son ONG, y se organizaron, y por eso la policía está aquí [de nuevo]” (1.01, 16 April 2016). In English: Here they organize…between them they organize themselves, they are not NGOs or anything similar, but they organized and because of that the police is here [once again]”.

  5. 5.

    In English: “The sparkplug of the community.”

  6. 6.

    In English: “Only the members [of community councils] reap any benefits.”

  7. 7.

    In English: “What there is are community councils and you that they don’t work, it works for a tiny group and he majority of people living in the barrio don’t get any benefits from community councils. They distribute [resources] between five and seven families and the rest remain helpless…that same thing happens with the light bulbs, and the same goes for everything distributed by the government, same with Mercales [government-owned grocery stores], they get to buy first, and the rest get fried [or left out] if you are not their friend”.

References

  • Alvarado Chacin N (2006) La Pobreza y la Política Social en Venezuela Vista desde los Pobres. Fermentum 16(45):162–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissevain J (1979) Network analysis: a reappraisal. Curr Anthropol 20(2):392–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning CR, Feinberg SL, Dietz RD (2004) The paradox of social organization: networks, collective efficacy, and violent crime in urban neighborhoods. Soc Forces 83(2):503–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik RJ (1988) Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: problems and prospects. Criminology 26(4):519–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Presidencial para el Control de Armas, Municiones y Desarme (2012) Homicidios en Venezuela. In: Sentido e Impacto del Uso de Armas de Fuego en Venezuela. Caracas, pp 69–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella R, MacCulloch R (2009) Why capitalism doesn’t flow to poor countries? Brook Pap Econ Act (spring):285–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella R, Donna J, MacCulloch R (2014) Oil, macro volativity, and crime in the determination of beliefs in Venezuela. In: Hausmann R, Rodriguez FR (eds) Venezuela before Chavez: anatomy of an economic collapse. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 407–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang X, Rosenfeld R, Dahlberg LL, Florence CS (2013) The nonlinear effect of neighborhood disadvantage on youth violence. In: Rosenfeld R, Edberg M, Fang X, Florence CS (eds) Economics and youth violence: crime, disadvantage, and community. New York University Press, New York and London, pp 121–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Field J (2008) Social capital. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2001) Social capital, civil society, and development. Third World Q 22(1):7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfrank B (2011) Los Concejos Comunales: Avance o Retroceso para la Democracia Venezolana? Revista de Ciencias Sociales 39:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipp JR, Wo JC (2015) Collective efficacy and crime. In: Wright JD (ed) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 2nd edn, vol 4. Elsevier, pp 69–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincon RN, Batista JL (2006) Evaluación del Capital Social estructural, Exclusión Social y Condiciones de Vida en el Marco del Proyecto Comunitario UDU-10. Toqueville, Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx B, Stoker T, Suri T (2013) The economics of slums in the developing world. J Econ Perspect 27(4):187–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIlwaine C, Moser CO (2001) Violence and social capital in urban poor communities: perspectives from Colombia and Guatemala. J Intl Dev 13:965–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner SF, Baumer EP, Rosenfeld R (2004) Dimensions of social capital and rates of criminal homicide. Am Sociol Rev 69(6):882–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raubenbush SW (2001) Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 39(3):517–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR (2009) Violence and social orders: a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker KF (2008) Unequal crime decline: theorizing race, urban inequality, and criminal violence. New York University Press, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty T (1995) Social mobility and redistributive politics. Q J Econ 110(3):551–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R, Leonardi R, Nanetti R (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (1987) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press Berkeley, Los Angeles and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JA, Verdier T (2013) The political economy of clientelism. Scand J Econ 115(2):260–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld R, Messner SF, Baumer EP (2001) Social capital and homicide. Soc Forces 80(1):283–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld R, Messner SF (2013) Crime and the economy. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi and Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson RJ, Groves WB (1989) Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory. Am J Sociol 94(4):774–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multi-level study of collective efficacy. Science 277:918–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (2000) Social network analysis: a handbook, 2nd edn. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers D (1964) The mechanisms of an open petroleum economy. Soc Econ Stud 13(2):233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw CR, McKay HD (1942) Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Jean PK (2007) Pockets of crime: broken windows, collective efficacy, and the criminal point of view. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff N (1999) Understanding social capital: learning from the analysis and experience of participation. In: Dasgupta P, Seragelding I (eds) Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., pp 215–252

    Google Scholar 

  • van Zomeren M, Spears R, Fischer AH, Leach CW (2004) Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. J Pers Soc Psychol 87(5):649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren ME (2004) Social capital and corruption. Democr Soc 1(1):1, 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman B (1983) Network analysis: some basic principles. Sociol Theor 1:155–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinecker H (2014) Gewalt im Frieden: Formen und Ursachen der Gewaltkriminalität in Zentralamerika. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zubillaga V, Llorens M, Souto J (2015) Una Tregua Posible: La Violencia y el Pacto de Cese al Fuego entre Mujeres y Jóvenes Armados. In: Briceño-Leon R (ed) Ciudades de Vida y Muerte: La Ciudad y el Pacto Social para la Contención de la Violencia. Alfa, Caracas, pp 225–253

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leon, D.S. (2020). Making Informal Social Control Happen: Empirical Findings on Collective Efficacy. In: Violence in the Barrios of Caracas. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22940-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics