Skip to main content

Conclusions: Engaging with the Ethico-Political

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Nation/State Fantasy

Abstract

This chapter summarises this book’s main arguments, namely the rise of the fantasy of nation/state congruency and the ideal of homogeneous societies, however defined and practiced, as constitutive of the ‘modern international’. Drawing on Rancière, this chapter engages with the ethico-political, thus exposing the exclusionary and violent dimensions of ‘policy’ and ‘politics’ that arise from our regime of congruency. This means that by exposing ethico-political implications one could also take the political as an ethical space, precisely because it is, as Arendt argued, a ‘gap between past and future’, a space in which the present can be changed. This chapter concludes with three main ethico-political implications and advocate rethinking our dependence on the ideal of societal homogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Consider also how the biopolitical lens ignores the history of racial violence, war, slavery and genocide, or indeed the continuous practices of settler colonial societies. As Howell and Richter-Montpetit (2018) argue, Foucauldian-based security analyses and biopolitics in particular read in/security through the Foucauldian and Eurocentric lens of the never secured human such that their ‘claim that life cannot be secured’, Howel and Richter-Montpetit (2018) argue, ‘fails to take account of how—conceptually and materially—the idea of human life is an effect of racism and colonialism’.

  2. 2.

    For recent discussions of GPIs see the Symposium in International Organization 73(3): 491–643.

  3. 3.

    Needless to say, as I explicate in other parts, that the logic of congruency also operates ‘internally’. The logic or what Puar (2017) defines as the ‘right to maim’ takes place not only in the borderland as such, but also within cities (in the West Bank, in the USA) around racial and civilizational borders, so to speak.

References

  • Abizadeh, Arash. 2002. Does Liberal Democracy Presuppose a Cultural Nation? Four Arguments. American Political Science Review 96 (3): 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Liberal Nationalist Versus Postnational Social Integration: On the Nation’s Ethno-Cultural Particularity and ‘Concreteness’. Nations and Nationalism 10 (3): 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsen, Rita. 2005. Blair’s Africa: The Politics of Securitization and Fear. Alternatives 30 (1): 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. ‘What Is a People’, in Means Without Ends: Notes on Politics. Trans. Cesare Casarino and Vincenzo Binetti. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agathangelou, Anna M., M. Daniel Bassichis, and Tamara L. Spira. 2008. Intimate Investments: Homonormativity, Global Lockdown, and Seductions of Empire. Radical History Review 100: 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, John A. 1994. The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Nadia, and Ben Whitham. 2018. The Unbearable Anxiety of Being: Ideological Fantasies of British Muslims Beyond the Politics of Security. Security Dialogue 49 (5): 400–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, Ruben. 2016. Here Be Dragons: Mapping an Ethnography of Global Danger. Current Anthropology 57 (6): 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between Past and Present. New York: The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arfi, Badredine. 2010. Fantasy in the Discourse of ‘Social Theory of International Politics’. Cooperation and Conflict 45 (4): 428–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoob, Mohammed. 1995. The Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict and the International System. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, Jens. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Critique of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, Didier, and Elspeth Guild, eds. 2017. Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig. 2008. Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 14 (3): 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call, Charles T. 2008. The Fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly 29 (8): 1491–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, David, and Michael J. Shapiro. 1999. Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, Margaret. 2016. Sleeping Dogs, Prowling Cats and Soaring Doves: Three Paradoxes in the Political Theory of Nationhood. Political Studies 49 (2): 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, David. 2007. The Security–Development Nexus and the Rise of ‘Anti-Foreign Policy’. Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (4): 362–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conversi, Daniele. 2012. Modernism and Nationalism. Journal of Political Ideologies 17 (1): 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, Stuart. 2012. Securitizing Islam: Identity and the Search for Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Letter to a Japanese Friend. In Derrida and Différance, ed. David Wood and Robert Bernasconi, 1–5. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Michael, and Andrew Neal, eds. 2008. Foucault on Politics, Security and War. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Michael, and Julian Reid. 2016. Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30 (1): 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Michael, and Luis Lobo-Guerrero. 2009. The Biopolitical Imaginary of Species-Being. Theory, Culture & Society 26 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, Roxanne L. 1996. Immigration and National Identity: Constructing the Nation. Review of International Studies 22 (3): 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Anti-Immigrantism in Western Democracies: Statecraft, Desire and the Politics of Exclusion. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. States of Exception on the Mexico–US Border: Security, “Decisions,” and Civilian Border Patrols. International Political Sociology 1 (2): 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, Alexander B. 2001. The Holy Land Divided: Defending Partition as a Solution to Ethnic Wars. Security Studies 10 (4): 58–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Social Reconstruction and the Radicalisation of Development: Aid as a Relation of Global Liberal Governance. In State Failure, Collapse and Reconstruction, ed. Jennifer Milliken, 291–312. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, Jakub. 2017. Narrative, Desire, Ontological Security, Transgression: Fantasy as a Factor in International Politics. Journal of International Relations and Development 22: 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edkins, Jenny. 2000. Whose Hunger?: Concepts of Famine, Practices of Aid. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Brad. 2010. Foucault’s Legacy: Security, War and Violence in the 21st Century. Security Dialogue 41 (4): 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, Stephen. 1994. Hypotheses on Nationalism and War. International Security 18 (4): 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Policy. 2016. The Fragile States Index. https://foreignpolicy.com/fragile-states-index-2016-brexit-syria-refugee-europe-anti-migrant-boko-haram/. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Gellner, Ernest. 2006 [1983]. Nations and Nationalism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, Raymond. 2002. Genealogy as Critique. European Journal of Philosophy 10 (2): 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack A., et al. 2000. State Failure Task Force Report: Phase III Findings. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/stm103%20articles/StateFailureReport.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.

  • Haritaworn, Jin, et al. 2013. Murderous Inclusions. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15 (4): 445–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Alison, and Melanie Richter-Montpetit. 2018. Racism in Foucauldian Security Studies: Biopolitics, Liberal War, and the Whitewashing of Colonial and Racial Violence. International Political Sociology 13 (1): 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, Naeem. 1996. Beyond the Sovereignty Dilemma: Quasi-States as Social Construct. In State Sovereignty as Social Construct, ed. Thomas J. Biersteker and Cynthia Weber, 50–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, Ilan. 2008. The Postcolonial Politics of Development. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Psychoanalysis and Development: Contributions, Examples, Limits. Third World Quarterly 35 (7): 1120–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Chaim D. 1998. When All Else Fails: Ethnic Population Transfers and Partitions in the Twentieth Century. International Security 23 (2): 120–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, Gavin, and Gary Wickham. 1999. Using Foucault’s Methods. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knodt, Eva M. 1995. Forward. In Social Systems, ed. Niklas Luhmann, ix–xxxvi. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzio, Taras. 2002. The Myth of the Civic State: A Critical Survey of Hans Kohn’s Framework for Understanding Nationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (1): 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 1998 [1973]. Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisle, Debbie. 2013. Frontline Leisure: Securitizing Tourism in the War on Terror. Security Dialogue 44 (2): 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löwenheim, Oded. 2007. The Responsibility to Responsibilize: Foreign Offices and the Issuing of Travel Warnings. International Political Sociology 1 (3): 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’. Third World Quarterly 29 (2): 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löwenheim, Oded, and Orit Gazit. 2009. Power and Examination: A Critique of Citizenship Tests. Security Dialogue 40 (2): 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2003. The Cognitive Program of Constructivism and a Reality that Remains Unknown. In Philosophies of Social Science: The Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Gerard Delanty and Piet Strydom, 436–441. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John J., and Robert A. Pape. 1993. The Answer – A Partition Plan for Bosnia. New Republic (14): 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Benjamin. 2007. States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgensen, Scott L. 2010. Settler Homonationalism: Theorizing Settler Colonialism Within Queer Modernities. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 16 (1–2): 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimni, Ephraim. 2007. National–Cultural Autonomy as an Alternative to Minority Territorial Nationalism. Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Noel, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies. Geopolitics 14 (3): 582–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Nigel, and Mark B. Salter. 2008. Israeli Biopolitics: Closure, Territorialisation and Governmentality in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Geopolitics 13 (4): 701–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puar, Jasbir K. 2017a. The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017b. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 1992. Politics, Identification, and Subjectivization. October 61: 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Oliver P. 2009. A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday. Review of International Studies 35 (3): 557–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, Robert I., ed. 2003. State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Michael S. 1981. Foucault’s ‘History of the Present’. History and Theory 20 (1): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, Vicky. 2016. The Exclusionary Politics of Asylum. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Yannis. 1999. Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Lacanian Left. Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Nikos Chrysoloras. 2006. (I Can’t Get No) Enjoyment: Lacanian Theory and the Analysis of Nationalism. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 11 (2): 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, Angharad C. 2013. The Persistence of Nationalism: From Imagined Communities to Urban Encounters. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Peter B. Evans et al., 169–191. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaeghe, Paul. 1999. Causation and Destitution of a Pre-ontological Non-entity: On the Lacanian Subject. In Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis, ed. Danny Nobus, 164–189. New-York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Cynthia. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevnik, Andreja. 2017. Postracial Society as Social Fantasy: Black Communities Trapped Between Racism and a Struggle for Political Recognition. Political Psychology 38 (4): 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Plague of Fantasies. 3rd ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moran M. Mandelbaum .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mandelbaum, M.M. (2020). Conclusions: Engaging with the Ethico-Political. In: The Nation/State Fantasy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22918-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics