Skip to main content

Abstract

Australia is a country of migrants, with a very small proportion of the population being Indigenous. Historically it has been diversity-averse, with policies designed to exclude non-white migrants and to assimilate the Indigenous peoples into a ‘White Australia’. But since the early 1970s, policy settings have oriented towards multiculturalism and a growing Indigenous rights movement, both (to some extent) recognizing and celebrating diversity. Perhaps ironically, this environment has meant that policy makers are wary of collecting race-based statistics. Thus the question of how aspects of globalization, particularly immigration, are affecting the mixed race make-up of Australia’s population is difficult to answer. In this chapter we argue for the value of at least attempting to collect race-based data in the Australian context. Focusing on Census enumeration, after noting that most official documents measure a single racial category (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander), if anything, we discuss the move from racial to ethnic categories in the Australian Census, and from exclusive to more inclusive and open options. We consider the various proxies for race that scholars use, and their limitations, and implications for understanding and measuring racial (and ethnic) mixedness. The current situation sees those of European, Asian, or African backgrounds collapsed within the non-Indigenous category, leaving researchers to use country of birth and the problematic category of ancestry as proxies for race. This, together with the fact that mixed Indigenous people tend to identify as Indigenous, means racial mixedness in Australia is difficult to ascertain. We argue that the boundaries and meanings of racial categories require scrutiny, to ensure demographic change can be tracked, allowing racially structured experiences and identities understood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Mixedness’ is used as shorthand to refer to mixed race. As well as being less grammatically awkward in some constructions, it adds a level of casualness to the discussion, moving away from debates about the existence of ‘race’, and enabling a recognition that mixedness often includes mixing of cultures and mixing that is not single generational.

  2. 2.

    It is unclear whether any validation studies have been undertaken to determine how respondents interpret the question, and at publication we had yet to receive confirmation from the ABS of this. With such a fuzzy meaning, including ‘claims of association’, it would be difficult to determine the ‘validity’ of responses to the ancestry question. In 1993/1994 validation work was done on the 1986 ethnic origin question, which led to the decision to drop the ancestry question, as noted above. An Ancestry Consultative Committee was established in the run-up to the 2001 Census, when the ancestry question was reintroduced. A similar consultative committee met in 2003, recommending that the 2001 question be retained, but there is little literature beyond this period about the methods used or validity tests conducted. Khoo and Lucas (2004) found with reference to the 2001 Census that while third and later generation Australians were most likely to indicate solely Australian ancestry, hyphenated-Australian mixed ancestry responses were most common among second generation Australians. They suggest (ibid., p. 69) that Australian ancestry may be seen as ‘an outcome of the mixing of different ethnicities in Australia’ as these individuals are likely to be the children of mixed partnerships, but also acknowledge that some may be non-mixed people of migrant background for whom ‘Australian’ ancestry is an indication of their shifting cultural affiliation. Khoo’s (2006) analysis of 1986 and 2001 ancestry responses shows that the two response limit resulted in some ancestries being undercounted, particularly Western European ancestries with high rates of intermarriage. The question design also had a significant effect on claims to Aboriginal ancestry. For example, in 1986 ‘Aboriginal’ was specified as an example on the form, whereas in 2001 ‘Aboriginal’ was not listed, while Australian ancestry was. The result was a sixfold increase in Indigenous respondents (identified through the ATSI question) stating Australian ancestry. At the level of anecdote, the first author’s three children all give different responses to the ancestry question, despite sharing the same parents (and therefore ancestors), suggesting a high level of subjectivity in response to the question of ancestry. It is also unclear whether there have been any attempts by the ABS to determine consistency of responses over time.

  3. 3.

    We wish to thank Peter Aspinall for this observation.

References

  • Aspinall, P. J. (2009). The Future of Ethnicity Classifications. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(9), 1417–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (1994). Census Working Paper 94/4—Ancestry, 1996 cat no. 1249.0. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/2950.0Main%20Features9991996?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=2950.0&issue=1996&num=&view=.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016a). Census Household Form. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2901.0Main%20Features802016/$FILE/2016%20Census%20Sample%20Household%20Form.pdf.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016b). Australian Standard Classification of Cultural and Ethnic Groups (ASCCEG) cat no. 1249.0. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/1249.0.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 1986 Population Census Ethnicity Committee & Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1984). The Measurement of Ethnicity in the Australian Census of Population and Housing: Report to the Australian Statistician. ABS: Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Census and Statistics. (1911, April 2–3). Census of the Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Census and Statistics. (1933, June 30). Census of the Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Census and Statistics. (1954, June 30). Census of the Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Immigration and Border Protection. (2015). Australia’s Migration Programme: Country Ranking 2014–2015. Retrieved from https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/ReportsandPublications/Documents/statistics/country-ranking-2014-15.pdf.

  • Elder, C. (2009). Dreams and Nightmares of a White Australia: Representing Aboriginal Assimilation in the Mid-Twentieth Century. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquarson, K. (2007, December 4–7). Racial Categories in Three Nations: Australia, South Africa and the United States. Paper Presented at The Australian Sociological Associate Conference. Auckland, NZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fozdar, F. (2018). Pride and Prejudice: Opposing Constructions of Mixed Race in Australia. Social Identities, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2018.1499228.

  • Fozdar, F., & Perkins, M. (2014). Antipodean Mixed Race. In R. King-O’Riain, S. Small, M. Mahtani, M. Song, & P. Spickard (Eds.), Global Mixed Race (pp. 119–143). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, G., & Bourke, E. (2000). Indigenous Populations, ‘Mixed’ Discourses and Identities. People and Place, 8(3), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. (1998). White Nation: Fantasies of White Supremacy in a Multicultural Nation. Sydney: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinsworth, D. (1998). Race and Racism in Australia. Katoomba, NSW: Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R. V. (1987). Ethnic Origin in the Australian Census. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 4(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, R. V. (1993). The Validity of Australian Ancestry Statistics. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 10(2), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2004). The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy 1. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, J. (2002). From White Australia to Woomera: The Story of Australian immigration. Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, J. (2007). The Quest for Harmony. In J. Jupp, J. Nieuwenhuysen, & E. Dawson (Eds.), Social Cohesion in Australia (pp. 9–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I. (2012). Mixed Race Across Time and Place: Contrasting Australia with the UK. In R. Edwards, S. Ali, C. Caballero, & M. Song (Eds.), International Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Mixedness and Mixing (pp. 23–35). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S. (2004). Intermarriage in Australia: Patterns by Ancestry, Gender and Generation. People and Place, 12(2), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S. (2006). Stability and Change in Ethnic Identification in Australia: An Aggregate Level Analysis. Journal of Population Research, 23(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S. (2010, November). Generational Change in Ethnic Composition and Inter-Ethnic Marriage: Implications for Australian Multiculturalism in the 21st Century. Paper Presented at the ‘A New Era in Australian Multiculturalism?’ Workshop, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S. E. (2011). Intermarriage, Integration and Multiculturalism: A Demographic Perspective. In M. Clyne & J. Jupp (Eds.), Multiculturalism and Integration: A Harmonious Relationship (pp. 101–119). Canberra: ANU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S., & Lucas, D. (2004). Australians’ Ancestries, 2001, Cat. No. 2054.0. Canberra: ABS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S., Birrell, B., & Heard, G. (2009). Intermarriage by Birthplace and Ancestry in Australia. People and Place, 17(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-O’Riain, R., Small, S., Mahtani, M., Song, M., & Spickard, P. (Eds.). (2014). Global mixed race. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukutai, T. H., & Broman, P. (2016). From Colonial Categories to Local Culture: Evolving State Practices of Ethnic Enumeration in Oceania, 1965–2014. Ethnicities, 16(5), 689–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, C., & Luke, A. (1998). Interracial Families: Difference Within Difference. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(4), 728–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, C., & Luke, A. (1999). Theorising Interracial Families and Hybrid Identity: An Australian Perspective. Educational Theory, 49(2), 223–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGavin, K., & Fozdar, F. (Eds.). (2017). Mixed Race Identities in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morning, A. (2008). Ethnic Classification in Global Perspective: A Cross-National Survey of the 2000 Census Round. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 239–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morning, A. (2012). Multiraciality and Census Classification in Global Perspective. In R. Edwards, S. Ali, C. Caballero, & M. Song (Eds.), International Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Mixedness and Mixing (pp. 10–22). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, J. (2002). Mixed Matches: Interracial Marriage in Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradies, Y. (2006). Beyond Black and White: Essentialism, Hybridity and Indigeneity. Journal of Sociology, 42(4), 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, M. (2004). Australian Mixed Race. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(2), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. A. (1993). Ethnic Intermixture in Australia. People and Place, 1(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P., & Hamilton, I. (1994). Patterns of Intermarriage in Australia: Regional Variations in Intermarriage Rates. Australian Journal of Marriage and Family, 15(3), 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P., & Hamilton, I. (1997). Interethnic Marriage: Identifying the Second Generation. International Migration Review, 31(1), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. (2018). Why We Still Need to Talk About Race. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(6), 1131–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spickard, P. (2015). Race in Mind: Critical Essays. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2017). Visible Minority and Population Group Reference Guide, Census of Population, 2016 cat no. 98-500-X2016006. Retrieved from https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/ref/guides/006/98-500-x2016006-eng.cfm.

  • Stevens, G., Ishizawa, I., & Grbic, D. (2015). Measuring Race and Ethnicity in the Censuses of Australia, Canada and the United States: Parallels and Paradoxes. Canadian Studies in Population, 42(1–2), 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, A. (2018). New Patterns of Ethnic Diversity: Exploring the Residential Geographies of Mixed-Ethnicity Individuals in Sydney, Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1467267.

  • Tindale, A., & Klocker, N. (2017). Mapping the Multiple Geographies of Mixed-Ethnicity Couples in Australia. Australian Geographer, 48(4), 473–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, A., & Klocker, N. (2018). The Diverse Geographies of Mixed-Ethnicity Couples. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(1), 194–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindale, A., Klocker, N., & Gibson, C. (2014). Inter-Ethnic Partnerships: Remaking Urban Ethnic Diversity. Urban Policy and Research, 32(4), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., & Heard, G. (2014). Interethnic Partnering: Patterns by Birthplace, Ancestry and Indigenous Status. In G. Heard & D. Arunachalam (Eds.), Family Formation in 21st Century Australia (pp. 53–76). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, E., & Kowal, E. (2018). To Be or Not to Be Indigenous? Understanding the Rise of Australia’s Indigenous Population Since 1971. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(16), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., Houston, S., Ellis, M., Holloway, S., & Hudson, M. (2003). Crossing Racial Lines: Geographies of Mixed Race Partnering and Multiraciality in the United States. Progress in Human Geography, 24(7), 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farida Fozdar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fozdar, F., Stevens, C. (2020). Measuring Mixedness in Australia. In: Rocha, Z.L., Aspinall, P.J. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Mixed Racial and Ethnic Classification. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22874-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22874-3_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22873-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22874-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics