Abstract
Reading failure is not caused by where the student lives or whether the child grows up in a 2-parent household or in a single-parent home. Race and nationality are also not a factor. Reading failure is caused by the teaching methods used in the classroom. These teaching methods are often mandated by school administration or state policy. Reading improvement is determined by individual learning differences, and each child improves at an individual pace. Every child can learn to read. The group-centered approach used with the Reading Orienteering Club proved to be successful. Children who had failed for multiple years could now read.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Community Survey. (2015). New census data show differences between urban and rural populations. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/cb16-210.html
Clanton Harpine, E. (2013). Erasing failure in the classroom, vol. 3: The Reading Orienteering Club, using vowel clustering in an after-school program. North Augusta, SC: Group-Centered Learning.
Cole, R. W. (2008). Educating everybody’s children: Diverse teaching strategies for diverse learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Graham, S. & Teague, C. (2011). Reading levels of rural and urban third graders lag behind their suburban peers. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.
Morris, D. (2005). The Howard Street tutoring manual: Teaching at-risk readers in the primary grades. NY: Guilford Press.
Morris, D., Tyner, B., & Perney, J. (2000). Early steps: Replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775110
Perney, J., Morris, D., & Carter, S. (1997). Factorial and predictive validity of first graders’ scores on the Early Reading Screening Instrument. Psychological Reports, 81, 207–210.
Ratcliffe, M., Burd, C., Holder, K., & Fields, A. (2016). Defining rural at the U.S. Census Bureau: American community survey and geography brief. Washington, DC: Census Bureau.
Acknowledgments
-
1.
Special appreciation to Keri Weed, Ph.D. and Elaine Clanton Harpine, Ph.D., University of South Carolina Aiken, for allowing their students to work on the project.
-
2.
A special thank you to St. John’s United Methodist Church in Aiken for providing community volunteers and financial sponsorship while allowing us to use classroom space for this project.
-
3.
Portions of this research were presented at the 123rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association at Washington, D.C. August 8, 2014.
-
4.
Portions of this research were presented at the 124th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association at Toronto, Ontario. August 7, 2015.
-
5.
Anna Thompson graduated with a B. A. in Psychology from the University of South Carolina Aiken and an M.A. in Global Youth Development from the University of Montana. She is now a student at the University of Maryland, Baltimore working on a Master’s in Social Work.
-
6.
Keri Weed earned her Ph.D. in developmental psychology from the University of Notre Dame. She is currently Distinguished Professor Emeritus from the University of South Carolina Aiken.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, A., Weed, K. (2019). Do Inner City and Rural Students Mix in a Reading Program? What Are the Challenges? The 2013–2015 Group Report. In: Clanton Harpine, E. (eds) After-School Programming and Intrinsic Motivation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22845-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22845-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22844-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22845-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)