Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law pp 361–382Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Inchoate Criminality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1211 Accesses

Abstract

Law-makers in many jurisdictions have recently created a range of new inchoate crimes: offenses that aim to prevent an ultimate harm by criminalizing conduct prior to the actual causing of that harm. Many observers have been worried by this development. They worry that these offenses criminalize conduct that does not deserve conviction and punishment; that they are disproportionate in their impact on citizens and their liberties; and that their preventive aims would be better pursued outside the criminal law. This chapter asks whether these worries are persuasive. It does so by examining a range of inchoate crimes, including offenses of attempt, endangerment, preparation, possession, and assistance and encouragement. It concludes that, while law-makers should be appropriately cautious about creating any criminal offense, there is no case for blanket skepticism about inchoate crimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, Larry, and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan. 2009. Crime and culpability: A theory of criminal law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012a. Danger: The ethics of preemptive action. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 9: 637–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. Risk and inchoate crimes: Retribution or prevention? In Seeking security: Pre-empting the commission of criminal harms, ed. G.R. Sullivan and Ian Dennis, 101–120. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Reflections on crime and culpability: Problems and puzzles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Larry, and Emily Sherwin. 2001. The rule of rules: Morality, rules, and the dilemmas of law. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, Andrew. 2011. The unfairness of risk-based possession offences. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5: 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, Andrew, and Lucia Zedner. 2012. Prevention and criminalization: Justifications and limits. New Criminal Law Review 15: 542–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Preventive justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asp, Petter. 2013. Preventionism and criminalization of nonconsummate offences. In Prevention and the limits of the criminal law, ed. Andrew Ashworth, Lucia Zedner, and Patrick Tomlin, 23–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Dennis J. 2007. The moral limits of criminalizing remote harms. New Criminal Law Review 10: 370–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Collective criminalization and the constitutional right to endanger others. Criminal Justice Ethics 28: 168–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudner, Alan. 2009. Punishment and freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, C.M.V. 2005. General endangerment offences: The way forward? University of Western Australia Law Review 32: 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, Andrew. 2013. Indirect crimes. Law and Philosophy 32: 485–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Preventive criminalization. New Criminal Law Review 18: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Rethinking the wrongness constraint on criminalisation. Law and Philosophy 36: 615–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, Michelle Madden. 2005. Rethinking Wolfenden: Prostitute use, criminal law and remote harm. Criminal Law Review 2005: 444–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubber, Markus. 2005. The possession paradigm: The special part and the police power model of the criminal process. In Defining crimes: Essays on the special part of the criminal law, ed. R.A. Duff and Stuart P. Green, 91–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R.A. 2005. Criminalizing endangerment. In Defining crimes: Essays on the special part of the criminal law, ed. R.A. Duff and Stuart P. Green, 43–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Answering for crime: Responsibility and liability in the criminal law. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Risks, culpability and criminal liability. In Seeking security: Pre-empting the commission of criminal harms, ed. G.R. Sullivan and Ian Dennis, 121–142. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, James. 2010. Justice denied: The criminal law and the ouster of the courts. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30: 725–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Criminalization without punishment. Legal Theory 23: 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1984. Harm to others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. 2011. Beyond crime and commitment: Justifying liberty deprivations of the dangerous and responsible. Minnesota Law Review 96: 141–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, John, and Timothy Macklem. 2002. Reasons. In The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law, ed. Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro, 440–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horder, Jeremy. 2012. Harmless wrongdoing and the anticipatory perspective on criminalisation. In Seeking security: Pre-empting the commission of criminal harms, ed. G.R. Sullivan and Ian Dennis, 78–102. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Adrian. 2007. Criminal prohibitions on direct and indirect encouragement of terrorism. Criminal Law Review 2007: 441–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak, Douglas. 1998. Reasonable risk creation and overinclusive legislation. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 1: 599–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Guns and drugs: Case studies on the principled limits of the criminal sanction. Law and Philosophy 23: 437–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Overcriminalization: The limits of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levanon, Liat. 2012. Criminal prohibitions on membership in terrorist organizations. New Criminal Law Review 15: 224–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenbrook, Barbara Baum. 1980. Prohibiting attempts and preparations. UMKC Law Review 49: 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSherry, Bernadette. 2008. Expanding the boundaries of inchoate crimes: The growing reliance on preparatory offences. In Regulating deviance: The redirection of criminalisation and the futures of criminal law, ed. Bernadette McSherry, Alan Norrie, and Simon Bronitt, 141–164. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohana, Daniel. 2006. Responding to acts preparatory to the commission of a crime: Criminalization or prevention? Criminal Justice Ethics 25: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Desert and punishment for acts preparatory to the commission of a crime. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20: 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petzsche, Anneke. 2017. The penalization of public provocation to commit a terrorist offence. European Criminal Law Review 7: 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, Peter. 2010. Preparation offences, security interests, political freedom. In The boundaries of the criminal law, ed. R.A. Duff, Lindsay Farmer, S.E. Marshall, Massimo Renzo, and Victor Tadros, 203–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, Joseph. 1975. Practical reason and norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripstein, Arthur. 1999. Prohibition and preemption. Legal Theory 5: 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santaella-Tenorio, Julian, Magdalena Cerdá, Andrés Villaveces, and Sandro Galea. 2016. What do we know about the association between firearm legislation and firearm-related injuries? Epidemiologic Reviews 38: 140–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schauer, Frederick. 1991. Playing by the rules: A philosophical examination of rule-based decision-making in law and in life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simester, A.P. 2012. Prophylactic crimes. In Seeking security: Pre-empting the commission of criminal harms, ed. G.R. Sullivan and Ian Dennis, 59–78. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simester, A.P., and Andreas von Hirsch. 2011. Crimes, harms, and wrongs: On the principles of criminalisation. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, Tom. 2017. Online grooming and preventive justice. Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadros, Victor. 2001. Recklessness, consent and the transmission of HIV. Edinburgh Law Review 5: 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Crimes and security. Modern Law Review 71: 940–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Wrongness and criminalization. In The Routledge companion to philosophy of law, ed. Andrei Marmor, 157–173. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Wrongs and crimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, Patti M., Jochen Peter, and Joseph B. Walther. 2016. Media effects: Theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology 67: 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Shlomit. 2007a. Criminalising remote harm and the case of anti-democratic activity. Cardozo Law Review 28: 2697–2738.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. The state’s duty of self-defence: Justifying the expansion of criminal law. In Security and human rights, ed. Benjamin J. Goold and Liora Lazarus, 277–303. Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaffe, Gideon. 2010. Attempts: In the philosophy of action and the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Andrew Cornford

Authors
  1. Andrew Cornford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Cornford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of San Diego School of Law, San Diego, CA, USA

    Larry Alexander

  2. University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Kimberly Kessler Ferzan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cornford, A. (2019). Inchoate Criminality. In: Alexander, L., Kessler Ferzan, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22811-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation