Abstract
This chapter contains summarized, brief, overall conclusions from the research in tactical management. It also contains initiation of several directions for future challenges tactical management faces in managerial and informational sense, which hopefully will add up to it. The contributions from the research in tactical management and from the practical applicability of the DENICA method are articulated once again, and appropriate references for their elaboration throughout the chapters are given. The aim of the research—to clarify why and how tactical management needs to be treated and addressed differently in managerial system, especially in the domain of information systems, through its core feature of adaptability—is discussed in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bērziša, S., et al. (2015). Capability driven development: An approach to designing digital enterprises. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(1), 15–25.
Danesh, M. H., Loucopoulos, P., & Yu, E. (2015). Dynamic capabilities for sustainable enterprise IT – A modeling framework. In P. Johannesson et al. (Eds.), Conceptual modeling: 34th international conference, ER 2015, Stockholm, Sweden, October 19–22, 2015, Proceedings (pp. 358–366). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_26
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413.
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.
Endsley, M. R. (2015). Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9(1), 4–32. Available from http://edm.sagepub.com.ezproxylocal.library.nova.edu/content/9/1/4.full
Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30(3), pp. 611–642. Available from http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~petterog/Kurs/INF5220/NatureofTheoryMISQ.pdf; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33846102423&partnerID=40&md5=e999cc9b09812ffe3192acf4b90d3e96
Haeckel, S. H. (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense-and-respond organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Haeckel, S. H. (2016a). Adaptive enterprise: The workbook. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Available from https://www.amazon.com/dp/1535437944
Haeckel, S. H. (2016b). Sense & respond: Designing and governing adaptive organizations. Accessed January 10, 2013, from http://www.senseandrespond.com/
Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., & Park, J. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. Available from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2017217
Kipling, R. (1902). I keep six honest serving men. Just so stories. Available from http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poems_serving.htm
Lichtenstein, B. B., et al. (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. E:CO Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 2–12.
Mackrell, D. & Mcdonald, C. (2014). Evaluation into action design research, Canberra. Available from https://www.rsa.anu.edu.au/media/552897/MacKrell-McDonald-ISF-2014-Incorporating-Content-Context-and-Process-Evaluation-into-Action-Design-Research.pdf
Maglio, P. P., Kieliszewski, C. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (2010). Handbook on service science. Cham: Springer.
Pawson, R. (2004). Simple principles for the evaluation of complex programmes. In M. Kelly, A. Kanaris, A. Morgan, B. Naidoo, et al. (Eds.), An evidence-based approach to public health and tackling health inequalities: Practical steps and methodological challenges (pp. 1–36). London: Sage.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
Poels, G., Van Der Vurst, G., & Lemey, E. (2013). Towards an ontology and modeling approach for service science. In J. Falcão e Cunha, M. Snene, & H. Nóvoa (Eds.), Exploring services science. IESS 2013. Lecture notes in business information processing (Vol. 143, pp. 285–291). Heidelberg: Springer.
Sein, M. K., et al. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.
Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238–246. Available from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-44649163716&partnerID=tZOtx3y1
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilties and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
Van Aken, J., & Romme, G. (2012). A design science approach to evidence-based management. In D. M. Rosseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 140–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wieringa, R. (2009). Design science as nested problem solving. In DESRIST 2009. USA: ACM.
Zdravkovic, J., et al. (2013). Modeling business capabilities and context dependent delivery by cloud services. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7908, 369–383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petrevska Nechkoska, R. (2020). Tactical Management Contributions to Managerial, Informational, and Complexity Theory and Practice. In: Tactical Management in Complexity. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22804-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22804-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22803-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22804-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)