Advertisement

Silk Production as a Silk Roads Imported Industrial Heritage to Europe: The Serbian Example

  • Milica Kocovic De SantoEmail author
  • Vesna Aleksic
  • Ljiljana Markovic
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

This chapter investigates industrial heritage related to silk production in Serbia. Silk and silk processing craft were imported from Asia through Silk Roads (across the Balkans and Italy towards Europe). Silk production on industrial level started in today’s Serbia in the middle of the 18th century. The whole process of silk production initiated the growth of mulberry trees, that changed cultural identity in the sense of the ‘everyday way of life’ and broader application and use of wood plant even today. Mostly based on our archival data, we mapped cities that had silk production in Serbia, highlighting interrelated fields such as culture, economy and identity, initiated by silk production. We emphasised the importance of imported silk-related phenomena and common cultural heritage, but also the authentic cultural identity that came out from the silk production in Serbia. It was important to examine all relevant institutions and sectors involved (historical perspective) around the silk production in Serbia, with consideration of possible alternative ways of integrative management options in order to govern and make industrial silk heritage more visible and valuable. Our focus and proposal in this sense go to the direction of participatory governance options, which will enable the multi-departmental approach. Our main research questions are:
  1. I.

    How important are the phenomena that came from Silk Roads seen as common but also authentic heritage?

     
  2. II.

    How to create a new system solution (for use, managing, conservation and risk mitigation of silk (roads) heritage (creation of new alternative (touristic) products and better local integration, regional, international)?

     
  3. III.

    What type of new system solution/management model is optimal for achieving optimal integration in relation to heritage-local people-values?

     
  4. IV.

    Why do we propose participatory governance with the aim to increase synergy and involvement of stakeholders?

     

Keywords

Industrial silk heritage Participatory governance Mulberry tree cultural identity Alternative solutions for commons 

References

  1. Alesić V, Malović M (2017) Past development of Serbian enterpeneurship: the case of privately- owned banking corporations. In: Radović Marković M, Nikitović Z, ZANADU LC (eds.). Insights and potential sources of new entrepreneurial growth: proceedings of the international roundtable on entrepreneurship 4 december 2016. Belgrade. Bologna Italy Filodiritto Publisher Inforomatica pp 42–54Google Scholar
  2. Archive of Yugoslavia documents: MTI, Number of funds: 65, AJ 1116, AJ 958 Number of folders 65; 424; 328: Silk price on world market 1922, Law for State silk factories; Memory book: 10 years of The Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenians 1918–1928; The report of the board of Serbian Silk Association; Labour rules for State Silk factories 1920; General financial plan for textile industry 1947 Federative Republic of Yugoslavia. MTI, Number of funds 65, Organization unit: Industry; XI group Textile Industry, AJ 959, Number of folders 329, years 1925–1940 65-329-959: 1926–1945 Silk production documents, (Letter to the Minister 1924 from Central Silk Management; Letter to the MIT from the evaluator and member of steering committee from State Silk Factories 1924; Letter of Minister MIT to the Ministry Board 1925; Regulation on the commercialization of the national directorate of sericulture and silk factory district 1933Google Scholar
  3. Charles B (2000) Crossing the desert of death: through the fearsome Taklamakan. John Murray, London, 59, 61, 64, 104, caption to f g. 14Google Scholar
  4. Đukic V (2017) WHO we are—how we are: a study of memory and identity policy in Serbia, Institute for theatre, film, radio and television, Faculty of Dramatic Arts, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  5. Federico G (1997, 2009) An economic history of the silk industry, 1830–1930. Cambridge Studies in Modern Economic History, Cambridge University press, digitally printed versionGoogle Scholar
  6. Gnjatović D, Aleksić V (2011) Rescuing Agricultural and Banking Sector from Collapse: Agricultural Debt Consolidation in Yugoslavia 1932-1936 Industry J Econ Inst – Belgrade 2, pp 283-297Google Scholar
  7. Hansen V (2012) The silk road, a new history. Oxford University pressGoogle Scholar
  8. Kocovic M, Djukic V (2015) Partnership as a strategy to achieve optimal participatory governance and risk mitigation (of cultural and natural heritage). ENCATC JGoogle Scholar
  9. Kocovic, Milica, Djukic, Vesna, Danijela V (2016) Making heritage more valuable and sustainable through intersectoral networking. ENCATC J Cultural Manag Policy, an online magazineGoogle Scholar
  10. Kocovic M (2017) Thesis: the contribution of eco-cultural tourism to a sustainable development of protected areas with associated cultural and natural heritage. Faculty of Dramatic Arts, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  11. Kocovic, Jovicic, Babic (2018) Challenges and alternatives related to the financial analysis and management options for achieving sustainable development of protected areas and commons. Mag Theme 42(3):939–959Google Scholar
  12. Kocovic De Santo, Markovic, De Santo (2018) Silk (as an Imported heritage) and it's market evolution in the South of Italy, Calabria example. J Int civilization stud 3(1):153–173Google Scholar
  13. Milleker M (1926) History of the Banat of military border 1764–1873 (pp 10). reprinted Pančevo History Archive 2004Google Scholar
  14. Sesic M, Rogac ML (2014) Balkan ‘Dissonant Heritage Narratives (and Their Attractiveness) for Tourism’. Am J Tour Manag.  https://doi.org/10.5923/s.tourism.201402.02

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milica Kocovic De Santo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vesna Aleksic
    • 1
  • Ljiljana Markovic
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Economic SciencesBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of PhilologyBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations