Abstract
The article provides theoretical and empirical study of cross-border mergers under the legal framework available in Poland following the implementation of the 2005 European Directive on Cross-Border mergers (CBMD). We begin with assessment of how the CBMD has been implemented into Polish company law and how it fits into general framework for domestic mergers. We then turn to presenting empirical data cross-border merger activity involving companies incorporated in Poland. The dataset embraces 126 transactions, whereby generally the publication of draft mergers terms counted as relevant for the inclusion into the cohort. Thus, what distinguishes this analysis is a focus not only on quantitative aspects but foremost on qualitative analysis of merger transactions. The results show a sharp increase in the number of cross-border mergers in the last 3 years. There is also an absolute prevalence of intra-group transactions. As regards the migration’s direction the study reveals a balanced ratio of inbound vs outbound mergers. When it comes to foreign jurisdictions involved, we demonstrate that Polish companies merge with entities incorporated in Cyprus or Luxembourg in more than half of the total number of transactions, which suggests a fiscal nature of the considerations underlying the operation. The article argues that there is a need to amend Polish rules on cross-border mergers in order to adjust them to the market expectations and demands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Articles 118–134 of the Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 relating to certain aspects of company law, O.J. 2017, L 169/1. Former, the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/56/EC of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies, O.J. 2015, L 310/1.
- 2.
Polish company or any other nationality refers to company established and being governed by the rules of such state.
- 3.
See Art. 8 of Regulation (EC) No. 2157/2001 on the Statute for a European Company (SE), O.J. 2001, L 294/1. Worthy noting is that 5 cross-border transfers of the SE’s seat (inbound and outbound) were carried out in Poland and one is now in progress (inbound).
- 4.
- 5.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 October 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:804. See Mucha and Oplustil (2018).
- 6.
The time of the execution of that transaction was 7 days after the complete application was filed by the Italian company to Polish register court in Szczecin. Meanwhile, however, the register Court in Kraków dismissed application for the conversion of Polish company into Czech company reasoning that such operation is inadmissible under Polish law.
- 7.
Kodeks spółek handlowych of Sep 15th, 2000, consolidated version Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland of 2017, item 1577. The CCC is a comprehensive regulation of companies and partnerships, as well as their mergers, divisions and transformations.
- 8.
Instead of many see Romanowski and Opalski (2009).
- 9.
Provisions on the cross-border merger by setting up a new company has been a dead letter since the implementation of them into Polish law. Practically, none of the transactions examined by the authors took place in that mode.
- 10.
Obviously, this can be achieved also by execution of exit right by the minority, described below.
- 11.
For a very detailed description of the Polish law on cross-border mergers see: Wroniak et al. (2012), Ch. 14.
- 12.
See general on corporate governance models: Weimer and Pape (2008).
- 13.
See Andersen and Sørensen (2013), pp. 250–251.
- 14.
See Article 126b(3a) of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 as regards cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions, COM(2018) 241.
- 15.
It was once ruled as unconstitutional by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal in case SK 23/03 of March 8th, 2004 in relation to general requirement of holding more than 1% of votes during shareholders meeting in order to be entitled to challenge any resolution.
- 16.
This provision is vastly based on § 16 sec. 3(1) and (3) German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz).
- 17.
See in context of cross-border restructurings: Lombardo (2009), p. 647.
- 18.
Basically, company merges into a company set up in another Member State (‘shell’ company) in order to change its ‘legal clothes’ (downstream merger, also known as reverse vertical merger. See Siems (2008), pp. 179–180.
- 19.
Rodzynkiewicz (2016), pp. 408–409.
- 20.
Oplustil (2015), p. 1258.
- 21.
Radwan (2016), pp. 92–93.
- 22.
Rodzynkiewicz (2016), pp. 152–154.
- 23.
- 24.
Cf. Biermeyer and Meyer (2018), pp. 3–4.
- 25.
Cf. ibid., p. 6.
- 26.
See art. 24a of Act of February 15, 1992 on legal person’s income tax, consolidated text: Polish OJ of 2018, item 1036.
- 27.
One reservation needs to be done here: in case of an exit transaction, in which Polish companies were merging into foreign company, the date of completing merger was the moment of deleting Polish company from the commercial register. The main reason for this is scarcity of data from foreign registers.
- 28.
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 as regards cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions (Text with EEA relevance), COM(2018) 241 final, 2018/0114(COD) (25.4.2018).
References
Andersen PK, Sørensen EJB (2013) The Danish Companies Act. A modern and competitive European Law. Djoef Publishing, Kopenhagen
Biermeyer T (2015) Stakeholder protection in cross-border seat transfers in the EU. Wolf Legal Publishers, Oisterwijk
Biermeyer T, Meyer M (2018) Cross-border corporate mobility in the EU: empirical finding. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3116042
Gerner-Beuerle C, Mucciarelli FM, Schuster E, Siems M (2017) Cross-border reincorporations in the European Union: the case for comprehensive harmonisation. J Corp Law Stud 18(1):1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2017.1349428
Lombardo S (2009) Regulatory competition in company law in the EU after Cartesio. Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 10(4):627–648. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752909006272
Mucha A, Oplustil K (2018) Redefining the freedom of establishment under EU law as the freedom to choose the applicable company law: a discussion after the judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 25 October 2017 in Case C-106/16, Polbud. Eur Company Financ Law Rev 15(2):270–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0010
Oplustil K (2015) In: Bieniak J et al (eds) Kodeks spółek handlowych. Komentarz. CH Beck, Warsaw
Radwan A (2016) Ius dissidentium. Granice konsensusu korporacyjnego i władzy większości w spółkach kapitałowych. CH Beck, Warsaw
Rodzynkiewicz M (2016) In: Opalski A (ed) Kodeks spółek handlowych. Tom IV. Łączenie, podział i przekształcenia spółek. Przepisy karne. Komentarz. Art. 491-633. CH Beck, Warsaw
Romanowski R, Opalski A (2009) Nowelizacja Kodeksu spółek handlowych w sprawach transgranicznego łączenia się spółek kapitałowych. MOP Special 14:1–23
Siems M (2008) European directive on cross-border mergers: an international model? Columbia J Eur Law 11(1):167–186
Szumański A (2009) In: Sołtysiński S et al (eds) Kodeks spółek handlowych. Komentarz, vol 4. CH Beck, Warsaw
Weimer J, Pape J (2008) A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance. Corp Gov 7(2):152–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00143
Wroniak M et al (2012) Cross-border reorganization in Poland. In: Vermeylen J, Vande Velde I (eds) European cross-border mergers and reorganisations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Acknowledgements
Ariel Mucha wishes to thank for financial assistance of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation on the research stay at the Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg (Germany). Arkadiusz Radwan would like to thank Thomas Papadopoulos for the invitation to speak at the conference “Cross-border Mergers Directive: EU perspectives and national experiences” (University of Cyprus, Oct. 7th, 2017) and conference participants for discussion and valuable comparative insights. The author also acknowledges that the credit for the empirical analysis should solely go to his co-author Ariel Mucha.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mucha, A., Radwan, A. (2019). Cross-Border Mergers: Experiences from Poland. In: Papadopoulos, T. (eds) Cross-Border Mergers. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22753-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22753-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22752-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22753-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)