Skip to main content

The Implementation of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive (2005/56/EC) in Germany: A Story of Insufficiencies and (Better) Alternatives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Border Mergers

Part of the book series: Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation ((SEELR,volume 17))

  • 816 Accesses

Abstract

The implementation of the 10th European Company Law Directive (Cross-Border Mergers Directive (2005/56/EC)) in the German Law Regulating Transformations of Companies (Umwandlungsgesetz [UmwG]) in 2007 provided for the first time a legal framework for cross-border mergers of corporations in Germany. However, these provisions are hardly used in practice and are generally considered as a failure. After analyzing the reasons for this limited use of cross-border mergers in Germany the paper analyses various aspects of the respective provisions dealing especially with the rather broad and extensive rules on the protection of minority shareholders and the rules on creditor protection. Afterwards the paper shows alternatives to cross-border mergers reflecting especially the discussion in Germany on the impact of the Sevic-, Cartesio and VALE-cases of the ECJ.

As far as reference is made to the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz [AktG]), the Closed Corporation Act (Gesetz betreffend die Gesellschaften mit beschränkter Haftung [GmbHG]) and the Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz [UmwG]) this country report is based on the official translations provided by the German Federal Ministry of Justice (available under www.gesetze-im-internet.de/Teilliste_translations.html).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ECJ as of 13.12.2005 – C-411/03 (SEVIC Systems AG), ECR I-10805.

  2. 2.

    For a historical overview see Stengel in: Semler and Stengel (2017), Einleitung A note 6 ff. with further references.

  3. 3.

    See Sect. 4 for further details.

  4. 4.

    Zweites Gesetz zur Änderung des Umwandlungsgesetzes as of 19.4.2007, Federal Gazette as of 24.4.2007, p. 542 ff.

  5. 5.

    See Legislative Explanatory Statement, BR-Drucks. 548/06, p. 20.

  6. 6.

    See especially Bayer and Schmidt (2006a), p. 841; Drinhausen and Keinath (2006), p. 732; Forsthoff (2006), p. 618; but see also Müller (2006), p. 290 favouring a limitation to corporations.

  7. 7.

    Drinhausen in: Semler and Stengel (2017), § 122b note 5; Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1162.

  8. 8.

    Bayer in: Lutter (2014), § 122a note 16; Drinhausen and Keinath (2006), p. 726; Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1162.

  9. 9.

    Since the conditions of a BREXIT are not settled yet it remains unclear how the German law will deal with these English corporations. However, it is already generally accepted that the managers of these corporations have to deal with alternative szenarios (see for this discussion Schall (2016), p. 407).

  10. 10.

    Bayer in: Lutter (2014), § 122a note 24 ff. with further references.

  11. 11.

    This is especially the case for the appraisal right (see Sect. 3.2) and the creditor protection (see Sect. 3.3).

  12. 12.

    In favour of an unconditional cash offer Polley in: Henssler and Strohn (2014), § 122i note 2; Schmitt et al. (2016), § 122i note 5; dissenting Bayer and Schmidt (2006a), p. 844; Vetter (2006), p. 623.

  13. 13.

    BGH v. 29.9.2015 – II ZB 23/14, NZG 2016, 139 = AG 2016, 135; for a detailled discussion see Mock (2016), p. 1261 ff.

  14. 14.

    Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1162; Bayer in: Lutter (2014), § 122h note 4; Bayer and Schmidt (2006b), p. 404.

  15. 15.

    See e.g. Bayer in: Lutter (2014), § 122h note 4.

  16. 16.

    Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1163.

  17. 17.

    Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1163; Polley in: Henssler and Strohn (2014), § 122j note 8.

  18. 18.

    Krause and Kulpa (2007), p. 75; Müller (2006), p. 289; Passarge and Stark (2007), p. 803 ff.

  19. 19.

    Bayer and Schmidt (2006b), p. 405; Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1163.

  20. 20.

    Bayer in: Lutter (2014) § 122j note 6; Beutel (2008), p. 260; Drinhausen and Keinath (2006), p. 731.

  21. 21.

    ECJ as of 7.4.2016 – C-483/14 (KA Finanz/Sparkassen Versicherung), ECR I-205.

  22. 22.

    § 96 subs. 3 German Stock Corporation Act states:

    In case of listed companies which resulted from a cross-border merger and whose supervisory or management bodies according to the Act on the co-determination of employees shall, in case of a cross-border merger, comprise an equal number of shareholders’ and employee representatives, the respective supervisory or management body shall comprise at least 30 per cent of both women and men. 2(2) sentences 2, 4, 6 and 7 shall apply accordingly.

  23. 23.

    Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1163 f.; Teichmann and Rüb (2015), p. 266.

  24. 24.

    See Bayer, Grenzüberschreitende Verschmelzungen im Zeitraum von 2007 bis 2012, https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/mbf_2013_06_verschmelzungen_bayer.pdf.

  25. 25.

    ECJ as of 13.12.2005 – C-411/03 (SEVIC Systems AG), ECR I-10805.

  26. 26.

    Bayer in: Lutter (2014) § 122a note 12; Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1164; Siems (2006), p. 135.

  27. 27.

    ECJ as of 27.9.1988 – 81/87 (The Queen gegen H. M. Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Daily Mail and General Trust plc.), ECR I-5483.

  28. 28.

    ECJ as of 16.12.2008 – C-210/06 (CARTESIO Oktató és Szolgáltató bt.), ECR I-9641.

  29. 29.

    ECJ as of 12.7.2012 – C-378/10 (VALE Építési kft), ECR I-440.

  30. 30.

    See Kindler in: Münchener Kommentar zum BGB (2017), Internationales Gesellschaftsrecht note 127, p. 854; Leible and Hoffmann (2006), p. 166; Leuering (2008), p. 75.

  31. 31.

    Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1164 f.

  32. 32.

    In favour of such a limitation König and Bormann (2012), p. 1242 f.; Wöhlert and Degen (2012), p. 433 f.; dissenting Schmitt et al. (2016), § 1 note 52; Bayer and Schmidt (2012), p. 1486.

  33. 33.

    ECJ as of 25.10.2017 – C-106/16 (Polbud – Wykonawstwo sp. z o.o.), ECR I-804.

  34. 34.

    Drygala in: Lutter (2014), § 1 note 35.

  35. 35.

    Siems (2006), p. 138 f.

  36. 36.

    Siems (2006), p. 138 f.

  37. 37.

    See Sect. 3.1.

  38. 38.

    Drygala and von Bressendorf (2016), p. 1165.

  39. 39.

    Siems (2006), p. 138 f.

References

  • Bayer W, Grenzüberschreitende Verschmelzungen im Zeitraum von 2007 bis 2012, https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/mbf_2013_06_verschmelzungen_bayer.pdf

  • Bayer W, Schmidt J (2006a) Der Regierungsentwurf zur Änderung des Umwandlungsgesetzes - Eine kritische Stellungnahme. NZG 841–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer W, Schmidt J (2006b) Die neue Richtlinie über die grenzüberschreitende Verschmelzung von Kapitalgesellschaften - Inhalt und Anregungen zur Umsetzung in Deutschland. NJW 59:401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer W, Schmidt J (2012) Das Vale-Urteil des EuGH: Die endgültige Bestätigung der Niederlassungsfreiheit als “Formwechselfreiheit”. ZIP 33:1481–1492

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutel D (2008) Der neue rechtliche Rahmen grenzüberscheitender Verschmelzungen in der EU. Utzverlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinhausen F, Keinath A (2006) Referentenentwurf eines zweiten Gesetzes zur Änderung des Umwandlungsgesetzes - Erleichertung grenzüberschreitender Verschmelzungen für deutsche Kapitalgesellschaften? BB 61:725–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Drygala T, von Bressendorf T (2016) Gegenwart und Zukunft grenzüberschreitender Verschmelzungen und Spaltungen. NZG 1161–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsthoff U (2006) Internationale Verschmelzungsrichtlinie: Verhältnis zur Niederlassungsfreihei und Vorwirkung; Handlungszwang für Mitbestimmungsreform. DstR 44:613–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Henssler M, Strohn L (2014) Gesellschaftsrecht, 2nd edn. C.H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • König DC, Bormann J (2012) “Genuine Link” und freie Rechtsformwahl im Binnenmarkt - Trendwende bei der Anerkennung von “Scheinauslandsgesellschaften” durch die VALE-Entscheidung des EuGH? NZG:1241–1244

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause N, Kulpa N (2007) Grenzüberschreitende Verschmelzungen. ZHR 171:38–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Leible S, Hoffmann J (2006) Grenzüberschreitende Verschmelzungen im Binnenmarkt nach ‘Sevic’. RiW 52:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuering D (2008) Von Scheinauslandsgesellschaften hin zu ‘Gesellschaften mit Migrationshintergrund. ZRP:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutter M (ed) (2014) Kommentar zum Umwandlungsgesetz, 5th edn. Dr. Otto Schmidt, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Mock S (2016) Die rückwirkende Anwendung von Bewertungsstandards - zugleich Besprechung von BGH v. 29.9.2015 - II ZB 23/14. WM 1261–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller H-F (2006) Die grenzüberschreitende Verschmelzung nach dem Referentenentwurf des Bundesjustizministeriums. NZG 9:286–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Münchener Kommentar zum BGB (2017) 7th edn. C.H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarge M, Stark M (2007) Gläubigerschutz bei grenzüberschreitenden Verschmelzungen nach dem Zweiten Gesetz zur Änderung des Umwandlungsgesetzes. GmbHR:803–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Schall A (2016) Grenzüberschreitende Umwandlungen der Limited (UK) mit deutschem Verwaltungssitz - Optionen für den Fall des Brexit. ZfPW 2:407–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J, Hörtnagl R, Stratz R-C (2016) Umwandlungsgesetz, 7th edn. C.H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Semler J, Stengel A (2017) Umwandlungsgesetz, 4th edn. C.H. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Siems MM (2006) SEVIC: Der letzte Mosaikstein im Internationalen Gesellschaftsrecht der EU? EUZW 17:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichmann C, Rüb C (2015) Der Regierungsentwurf zur Geschlechterquote in Aufsichtsrat und Vorstand. BB:259–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter J (2006) Die Regelung der grenzüberschreitenden Verschmelzung im UmwG - Einige Bemerkungen auch Sicht der Praxis. AG:613–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöhlert H-T, Degen S (2012) Die neue Mobilität von Gesellschaften in Europa nach “Vale” und “National Grid Indus”. GWR:432–436

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Mock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex (English Translation of §§ 122a ff. German Transformation Act)

Annex (English Translation of §§ 122a ff. German Transformation Act)

1.1 Chapter 10 (Cross-Border Merger of Companies Limited by Shares)

Section 122a (Cross-Border Merger)

  1. (1)

    A cross-border merger is a merger in which at least one of the companies involved is subject to the laws of another Member State of the European Union or of another contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area.

  2. (2)

    Unless otherwise provided for in the present Chapter, the regulations of Part 1 and those of Chapters 2, 3, and 4 of Part 2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the involvement of a company limited by shares (Section 3 (1) no. 2) in a cross-border merger.

Section 122b (Companies Eligible for Mergers)

  1. (1)

    Solely companies limited by shares in the sense of Article 2 no. 1 of the Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (Official Journal no. L 310 p. 1) may be involved in a cross-border merger as companies being acquired, acquiring companies, or newly formed companies that have been established pursuant to the laws of a Member State of the European Union or of some other contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area and that have their registered seat as recorded in the by-laws, their central administration, or their principal place of business in a Member State of the European Union or some other contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area.

  2. (2)

    The following may not be involved in a cross-border merger:

    1. (a)

      cooperative societies, even in the cases where they would fall within the definition laid down in Article 2 no. 1 of the Directive in accordance with the laws of some other Member State of the European Union or some other contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area;

    2. (b)

      companies the object of which is the collective investment, in keeping with the principle of risk diversification, of capital provided to them by the public, the shares of which companies may be repurchased or redeemed, at the request of the owners of shares, directly or indirectly out of the assets of that company. Actions taken by such a company to ensure that the stock exchange value of its shares does not vary significantly from its net asset value shall be regarded as equivalent to these repurchases or redemptions.

Section 122c (Draft Terms of Merger)

  1. (1)

    The representative body of a company involved shall prepare, together with the representative bodies of the other companies involved, common draft terms of merger.

  2. (2)

    The draft terms of merger, or their initial outline, must provide the following information at a minimum:

    1. (a)

      the legal form, firm name, and registered seats, respectively, of the company being acquired and the acquiring or newly formed company,

    2. (b)

      the ratio applicable to the exchange of shares in the company and, as the case may be, the amount of the additional cash payments,

    3. (c)

      the details regarding the allotment of the shares in the acquiring or newly formed company,

    4. (d)

      the likely repercussions of the merger on employment by the company,

    5. (e)

      the date from which the shares in the company will entitle their holders to participate in the profits, as well as any special conditions affecting that entitlement,

    6. (f)

      the date from which the actions taken by the companies being acquired will be deemed, for accounting purposes, as having been taken for the account of the acquiring or newly formed company (merger cut-off date),

    7. (g)

      the rights conferred by the acquiring or newly formed company on the shareholders enjoying special privileges and on holders of securities other than shares in the company, or the measures proposed concerning such shareholders and holders of securities,

    8. (h)

      any special advantages granted to the experts auditing the draft terms of merger or the members of the administrative, management, supervisory, or controlling bodies of the companies involved in the merger,

    9. (i)

      the by-laws of the acquiring or newly formed company,

    10. (j)

      as the case may be, information on the procedures by which arrangements are determined for the involvement of employees in the definition of their co-determination rights in the company resulting from the cross-border merger,

    11. (k)

      information on the valuation of the assets and liabilities that are to be transferred to the acquiring or newly formed company,

    12. (l)

      the cut-off date of the balance sheets of the companies involved in the cross-border merger, based on which the terms of the cross-border merger are determined.

  3. (3)

    Where all shares in a company being acquired are held by the acquiring company, the information regarding the exchange of the shares (subsection (2) nos. 2, 3 and 5) shall not be required inasmuch as it concerns the absorption of this company.

  4. (4)

    The draft terms of merger must be recorded by a notary.

Section 122d (Publication by Notice of the Draft Terms of Mergers)

The draft terms of merger, or their initial outline, are to be filed with the register not less than one (1) month prior to the assembly of owners of shares who are to adopt a resolution consenting to the draft terms of merger pursuant to section 13. The court is to provide notification of the following information in the publication by notice pursuant to section 10 of the Commercial Code (HGB), and shall do so without undue delay:

  1. 1.

    an indication as to the draft terms of merger, or their initial outline, having been filed with the commercial register,

  2. 2.

    the legal form, firm name and registered seats of the respective companies involved in the cross-border merger,

  3. 3.

    the registers in which the companies involved in the cross-border merger have been entered, as well as the respective number under which they have been entered,

  4. 4.

    an indication of the arrangements made for the exercise of the rights of creditors and of any minority shareholders of the companies involved in the cross-border merger, along with the address at which full and complete information on those arrangements may be obtained free of charge.

The information that is to be published by notice is to be provided to the register when filing the draft terms of merger, or their initial outline.

Section 122e (Report on the Cross-Border Merger)

The report on the cross-border merger drawn up in accordance with section 8 is to include an explanation of the repercussions that the cross-border merger will have on the creditors and employees of the company involved in the merger. The report on the cross-border merger is to be made available, pursuant to section 63 (1) no. 4, to the owners of shares as well as the works council responsible or, in the event no works council exists, to the employees themselves of the company involved in the cross-border merger; this shall be done not less than one (1) month prior to the assembly of owners of shares who are to adopt a resolution consenting to the draft terms of merger pursuant to section 13. Section 8 (3) shall have no application.

Section 122f (Audit of the Cross-Border Merger)

The draft terms of merger, or their initial outline, are to be audited in accordance with sections 9 through 12; section 48 shall have no application. The audit report must be made available not less than one (1) month prior to the assembly of owners of shares who are to adopt a resolution consenting to the draft terms of merger pursuant to section 13.

Section 122g (Consent by the Owners of Shares)

  1. (1)

    The owners of shares may make their consent pursuant to section 13 contingent on their express ratification of the arrangements made for the co-determination rights of the employees of the acquiring or newly formed company.

  2. (2)

    Where all shares in a company being acquired are held by the acquiring company, the owners of shares in the company being acquired need not adopt a merger resolution.

Section 122h (Improvement of the Ratio Applicable to the Exchange)

  1. (1)

    If the companies involved in the cross-border merger are governed by the laws of some other Member State of the European Union or some other contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area and these laws do not provide for a procedure to scrutinise and amend the ratio applicable to the exchange of shares, Section 14 (2) and section 15 shall apply to the owners of shares in a company being acquired only if the owners of shares in the companies involved in the cross-border merger expressly consent, in the merger resolution, to the application of said provisions.

  2. (2)

    Section 15 shall also apply to owners of shares in a company being acquired that is governed by the laws of some other Member State of the European Union or some other contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area, if the laws of this state provide for a procedure to scrutinise and amend the ratio applicable to the exchange of shares and German courts have international jurisdiction for the implementation of such a procedure.

Section 122i (Compensation Offer in the Draft Terms of Merger)

  1. (1)

    Where the acquiring or newly formed company is not governed by German law, the company being acquired is to offer, in the draft terms of merger, or their initial outline, to each owner of shares recording an objection against the merger resolution adopted by the company, to acquire that owner’s shares in return for appropriate cash compensation. The regulations of the Stock Corporation Act (AktG) regarding the acquisition of treasury stock as well as those of the Limited Liability Companies Act (GmbHG) regarding the acquisition of own business shares shall apply mutatis mutandis; however, section 71 (4), second sentence, of the Stock Corporation Act and section 33 (2), third sentence, second half-sentence, first alternative of the Limited Liability Companies Act shall have no application in this regard. Section 29 (1), fourth and fifth sentences, as well as subsection (2) of said section and sections 30, 31, and 33 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

  2. (2)

    If the companies involved in the cross-border merger are governed by the laws of some other Member State of the European Union or some other contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area and these laws do not provide for a procedure to compensate minority shareholders, Sections 32 and 34 shall apply to the owners of shares in a company being acquired only if the owners of shares in the companies involved in the cross-border merger expressly consent, in the merger resolution, to the application of said provisions. Section 34 shall also apply to owners of shares in a company being acquired that is governed by the laws of some other Member State of the European Union or some other contracting party of the Agreement creating the European Economic Area if the laws of this state provide for a procedure to compensate minority shareholders and German courts have international jurisdiction for the implementation of such a procedure.

Section 122j (Protection Afforded to the Creditors of the Company Being Acquired)

  1. (1)

    Where the acquiring or newly formed company is not governed by German law, the creditors of a company being acquired are to be provided security insofar as they cannot demand satisfaction of their claims. However, the creditors shall be entitled to this right only if they assert their claim in writing, citing its merits and its amount, within two (2) months of the date on which the draft terms of merger, or their initial outline, have been published by notice, and if they satisfactorily demonstrate that the cross-border merger will jeopardise the performance of the claim they hold.

  2. (2)

    Creditors shall be entitled to obtain security pursuant to subsection (1) only with regard to such claims that have arisen before the date on which the draft terms of merger, or their initial outline, have been published by notice, or not later than fifteen (15) days after such date.

Section 122k (Merger Certificate)

  1. (1)

    The representative body of a company being acquired is to file an application with the register kept at the registered seat of the company for entry in same of the fact that the pre-requisites for the cross-border merger relevant to said company have been met. Section 16 subsections (2) and (3) and section 17 shall apply mutatis mutandis. The members of the representative body shall affirm that all creditors entitled to provision of security pursuant to section 122j have been provided such security in an appropriate measure.

  2. (2)

    The court shall review whether the pre-requisites for a cross-border merger by the company have been met and shall issue a certificate regarding this fact (merger certificate), doing so without undue delay. The notification as to the cross-border merger having been entered in the register shall be deemed a merger certificate. The entry in the register is to include the note that the cross-border merger shall enter into force subject to the pre-requisites stipulated by the laws of the state governing the acquiring or newly formed company. The merger certificate may only be issued if an affirmation pursuant to subsection (1), third sentence, has been given. Where valuation proceedings under corporate law are pending, this is to be recorded in the merger certificate.

  3. (3)

    The representative body of the company is to submit the merger certificate within six (6) months of its having been issued, together with the draft terms of merger, to the competent authority of that state the laws of which govern the acquiring or newly formed company.

  4. (4)

    Upon the court receiving a notice from the register, in which the acquiring or newly formed company has been entered, as to the cross-border merger having entered into force, the court having jurisdiction at the registered seat of the company being acquired is to note the date on which the cross-border merger so entered into force and is to transmit to that register the electronic documents it has been keeping safe.

Section 122l (Entry in the Register of the Cross-Border Merger)

  1. (1)

    In the case of a cross-border merger by absorption, the representative body of the acquiring company is to file an application with the register kept at the registered seat of the company for the cross-border merger to be entered in same; in the case of a cross-border merger by new formation, the representative bodies of the companies being acquired are to file an application for entry of the newly formed company in the register kept at the registered seat of the company. The merger certificates of all companies being acquired, the common draft terms of merger and, as the case may be, the agreement regarding employee co-determination rights are to be attached to the application for entry in the register. The merger certificates may not be older than six (6) months; section 16 subsections (2) and (3) and section 17 shall not apply to the companies being acquired.

  2. (2)

    The audit of whether or not the pre-requisites for entry in the register of the cross-border merger have been met shall extend in particular to the matter of whether or not the owners of shares in all of the companies involved in the cross-border merger have consented to identically worded common draft terms of merger and of whether or not an agreement regarding employee co-determination rights has been concluded, where applicable.

  3. (3)

    The court having jurisdiction at the registered seat of the acquiring or newly formed company is to notify, ex officio, each register with which one of the companies being acquired had to lodge its records of the date on which the merger was entered with it.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mock, S. (2019). The Implementation of the Cross-Border Mergers Directive (2005/56/EC) in Germany: A Story of Insufficiencies and (Better) Alternatives. In: Papadopoulos, T. (eds) Cross-Border Mergers. Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22753-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22753-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22752-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22753-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics