Advertisement

Passing-on in Cartel Damages Action: An Agent-Based Model

  • Claudia NardoneEmail author
  • Federico Cecconi
Chapter
  • 224 Downloads
Part of the Computational Social Sciences book series (CSS)

Abstract

When there are infringements causing a price increase, such as cartels, one of the effects on direct purchaser’s profit is the so-called passing-on effect. Passing-on rate is the proportion of the illegal price increase that cartel direct purchasers, in turn, translate into an increase in their own final price. In this chapter, we develop an agent-based model of a supply chain, where agents are firms who lay on different levels of the chain and are engaged in trading.

Keywords

Price variation Agent-based modelling Trading Firm behaviour Cartel 

References

  1. Ashenfelter, O., Ashmore, D., Baker, J., & McKernan, S-M. (1998). Identifying the firm-specific cost pass-through rate, Federal Trade Commission Working Paper No. 217.Google Scholar
  2. Ashton, D., & Henry, D. (2013). Competition damages actions in the EU – Law and practice, Elgar competition law and practice series.Google Scholar
  3. Bhaskar, V., Machin, S., & Reid, G. C. (1993). Price and quantity adjustment over the business cycle: Evidence from survey data. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(2), 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnet, C., & Villas Boas, S. (2013). An analysis of asymmetric consumer price responses and asymmetric cost pass-through in the French co¤ee market, Working Paper No. 10, Transparency of Food Pricing project.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, P., & Garcés, E. (2009). Quantitative techniques for competition and antitrust analysis. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  6. Delli Gatti, D., Desiderio, S., Gaffeo, E., Cirillo, P., & Gallegati, M. (2011). Macroeconomics from the bottom up. Milan: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2013). Practical guide on quantifying harm in actions for damages based on the breaches of article 101 or 102 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union, 11 June 2013, SWD (2013) 205.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2016). Study on the passing-on of overcharges, Final report, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/KD0216916ENN.pdf
  9. Friederiszick, H. W., & Röller, L. H. (2010). Quanti…cation of harm in damages actions for antitrust infringements: Insights from German cartel cases. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 6(3), 595–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han, M. A., Schinkel, M. P., & Tuinstra, J. (2009). The overcharge as a measure for antitrust damages, Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics working paper, 2008–08.Google Scholar
  11. Hellwig, M. F. (2006). Private damage claims and the passing-On defense in horizontal price-fixing cases: An economist’s perspective, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Preprint, 2006/22.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, D., & Cotterill, R. W. (2008). Cost pass-through in differentiated product markets: The case of U.S. processed cheese. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(1), 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leibtag, E., Nakamura, A. O., Nakamura, E., & Zerom, D. (2007). Cost pass-through in the U.S. Co¤ee Industry, economic research report No. (ERR-38) 28.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, N. H., Osborne, M., & Sheu, G. (2016). Pass-through in a concentrated industry: Empirical evidence and regulatory implications, Manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. RBB Economics. (2014). Cost Pass-Through: Theory, measurement and policy implications, Report for the O¢ ce of Fair Trading.Google Scholar
  16. Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2011). Must-take cards: Merchant discounts and avoided costs. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 462–495, 06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tesfatsion, L. (2005). Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. In Handbook of computational economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North Holland. (Vol. 2, pp. 831–880).Google Scholar
  18. Tesfatsion, L., & Judd, K. (2006). Agent-based computational economics. In Volume 2 of Handbook of computational economics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  19. Tirole, J. (2003). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Verboven, F., & van Dijk, T. (2009). Cartel damages claims and the passing-on defense. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(3), 457–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weyl, E. G., & Fabinger, M. (2009). Pass-through as an economic tool, Manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEIS – University of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.LABSS ISTC-CNRROMEItaly

Personalised recommendations