Advertisement

Oil Palm Transgenic Research: Challenges, Update, and Future Outlook

  • Omar Abdul RasidEmail author
  • Subhi Siti Masura
  • Ayub Nor Hanin
  • Dayang Izawati Abang Masli
  • Bahariah Bohari
  • Mat Yunus Abdul Masani
  • Ghulam Kadir Ahmad Parveez
Chapter
  • 30 Downloads
Part of the Compendium of Plant Genomes book series (CPG)

Abstract

Oil palm is a major economic crop for Malaysia and it has contributed significantly to the country’s revenues. However, the industry is facing a number of challenges including labor shortage, reduced availability of arable land, and competition from other sources of oils and fats. Thus, strategies must be put in place for the industry to remain competitive. This could be attained through increase in yield, diversification of palm oil applications into higher value products, and production of value-added products. Genetic engineering has been identified as a complementary tool to breeding technique for overcoming the above challenges. The oil palm genetic engineering program was initiated more than two decades ago with the main target to increase oleic acid content. The initial optimization work for oil palm transformation was carried out using biolistics protocol leading to the first successful report of oil palm transformation in the mid 1990s. The optimized protocol was later used to produce transgenic oil palm with high oleic acid as well as other target products. However, analysis of these plants indicated the low efficiency and repeatability of the protocol. Work to improve the transformation efficiency was subsequently carried out including optimization of selection scheme. Moreover, due to recent successful application of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in several monocots, effort to develop the system for oil palm was also initiated. This paper describes the efforts to develop the transformation systems for oil palm and challenges faced during the process.

Keywords

Oil palm Genetic engineering Biolistics transformation Agrobacterium transformation Selectable marker 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the MPOB management for permission to publish this chapter.

References

  1. Abdullah R, Zainal A, Wee YH, Leaw CL, Yeap CB, Lee MP, Sirajudin SA, Yap SPW, Joseph JL, Jusoh SA, Muad MR, Yeun LH (2005) Immature Embryo: a useful tool for oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) genetic transformation studies. Electron J Biotechnol 8(1):25–34Google Scholar
  2. Abrizah O, Lazarus C, Fraser T, Stobart K (2000) Cloning of palmitoyl-ACP thioesterase from oil palm. Biochem Soc Trans 28:619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asemota O, San CT, Shah FH (2004) Isolation of a kernel oleoyl-ACP thioesterase gene from the oil palm Elaeis guineensis Jacq. African J Biotechnol 3(3):199–201Google Scholar
  4. Bahariah B, Parveez GKA, Khalid N (2012) Determination of optimal concentration of mannose as a selection agent for selecting transformed oil palm cells using the phosphomannose isomerase (pmi) gene as the positive selectable marker. J Oil Palm Res 24:1250–1259Google Scholar
  5. Bahariah B, Parveez GKA, Masani MYA, Masura SS, Khalid N, Othman RY (2013) Biolistic transformation of oil palm using the phosphomannose isomerase (pmi) gene as a positive selectable marker. Biocatal Agri Biotech 2:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basiron Y, Chan KW (2005) The role of research and development strategies in food safety and good agricultural, manufacturing and distribution practices in the Malaysian palm oil industry. Oil Palm Indus Econ J 5:1–16Google Scholar
  7. Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V (2013) Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9:39PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Boonyaves K, Romyanon K, Kirdmanee C, Supaibulwatana K (2009). Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Agricultural biotechnology international conference: agricultural biotechnology for better living and a clean environment, Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Bangkok, Thailand, 22–25 September 2009Google Scholar
  9. Chan MT, Chang HH, Ho SL, Tnag WF, Yu SM (1993) Agrobacterium-mediated production of transgenic rice plants expressing a chimeric a-amylase promoter/β-glucuronidase gene. Plant Mol Biol 22:491–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan PL, Siti Nor Akmar A, Roohaida O (2008) Light-harvesting chlorophyll A/B binding protein (LHCB) promoter for targeting specific expression in oil palm leaves. J Oil Palm Res (Spec Iss July), pp 21–29Google Scholar
  11. Cheah SC (2000) Biotechnological strategies for improving plantation tree crop: the palm oil—a case study. In: Proceeding international planters conference, pp 59–76Google Scholar
  12. Cheng M, Fry JE, Pang S, Zhou H, Hironaka CM, Duncan DR, Conner TW, Wan Y (1997) Genetic Transformation of wheat mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol 115(3):971–980PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng M, Lowe BA, Spencer TM, Ye X, Armstrong CL (2004) Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 40:31–45Google Scholar
  14. Chowdhury MKU, Parveez GKA, Saleh NM (1997). Evaluation of five promoters for use in transformation of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Plant Cell Rep 16:277–281Google Scholar
  15. DeBlock M, Botterman J, Vanderwiele M, Montagu M, Leeman J (1987) Engineering herbicide resistant in plant by detoxyfying enzyme. EMBO J 6:2513–2518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot AR, Cambell JA, Brettell RIS, Grof CPL (1998) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane using GFP as a screenable marker. Aust J Plant Physiol 25:739–743Google Scholar
  17. Fakhrana I, Nurfahisza AR, Rasid OA, Parveez GKA (2019) Minimal inhibitory concentration of hygromycin for selecting transformed oil palm embryogenic calli. J Oil Palm Res 31:14–27Google Scholar
  18. Fuad FAA, Ismail I, Sidik NM, Zain CRCM, Abdullah R (2008) Super binary vector system enhanced transformation frequency and expression level of polyhydroxyvalerate gene in oil palm immature embryo. Asian J Plant Sci 7(6):526–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31:397–407PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gritz L, Davies J (1983) Plasmids encodes hygromycin B resistance: the sequence of hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene and its expression in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisae. Gene 25:179–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanin AN, Masani MYA, Parveez GKA (2016) Evaluation of oil palm leaf-specific promoter (LSP1) activity for expressing PHB genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Oil Palm Res 28(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang X, Huang XL, Xiao W, Zhao JT, Dai XM, Chen YF, Li XJ (2007) Highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryogenic cell suspensions of Musa acuminate cv. Mas (AA) via a liquid co-cultivation system. Plant Cell Rep 26:1755–1762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishida Y, Saito H, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nat Biotechnol 14:745–750.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0696-745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ismail I, Iskandar NF, Gor MC, Abdullah R (2010) Genetic transformation and molecular analysis of polyhydroxybutyrate biosynthetic gene expression in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq. var Tenera) tissues. Plant Omics J 3(1):18–27Google Scholar
  25. Izawati AMD, Masani MYA, Ismanizan I, Parveez GKA (2015) Evaluation on the effectiveness of 2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate phosphatase (DOGR1) gene as a selectable marker for oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) embryogenic calli transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Front Plant Sci 6:727.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00727
  26. Jung C, Capistrano-Gossmann G, Braatz J, Niharika Sashidhar N, Melzer S (2018) Recent developments in genome editing and applications. Plant Breeding 137:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaeppler HF, Menon GK, Skadsen RW, Nuutila AM, Carlson AR (2000) Transgenic oat plants via visual selection of cell expressing green fluorescent protein. Plant Cell Rep 19:661–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Khemvong S, Suvachittanont W (2005) Molecular cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase from oil palm Elaeis guineensis Jacq. Plant Sci 169:571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khoo KM, Chandramohan D (2002) Malaysian palm oil industry at crossroads and its future direction. Oil Palm Indus Econ J 2(2):10–15Google Scholar
  30. Kunze I, Ebneth M, Heim U, Geiger M, Sonnewald U, Herbers K (2001) 2-Deoxyglucose resistance: a novel selection marker for plant transformation. Mol Breed 7:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kushairi AD (2018) Overview of the Malaysian palm oil industry 2017. Malaysian Palm Oil Board. Available from: http://bepi.mpob.gov.my/images/overview/Overview_of_Industry_2017.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2018
  32. Kushairi AD, Mohd Din A, Rajanaidu N (2011) Oil palm breeding and seed production. In: Mohd Basri W, Choo YM, Chan KW (eds) Further advances in oil palm research (2000–2010), vol 1. MPOB, Bangi, pp 47–93Google Scholar
  33. Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Cho MJ, Scelonge C, Lenderts B, Chamberlin M, Cushatt J, Wang L, Ryan L, Khan T, Chow-Yiu J, Hua W, Yu M, Banh J, Bao Z, Brink K, Igo E, Rudrappa B, Shamseer PM, Bruce W, Newman L, Shen B, Zheng P, Bidney D, Falco SC, Registerlll JC, Zhao ZY, Xu D, Jones TJ, Gordon-Kamm WJ (2016) Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell 28:1998–2015PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Majid NA, Parveez GKA (2007) Evaluation of green fluorescence protein (GFP) as a selectable marker for oil palm transformation via transient expression. Asia Pac J Mol Bio Biotech 15:1–8Google Scholar
  35. Majid NA, Parveez GKA (2016) Regeneration of transgenic oil palm carrying gfp gene used as a visual selectable marker. J Oil Palm Res 28(4):415–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malzhan A, Lowder L, Qi Y (2017) Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR. Cell Biosci 7:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manaf MAA, Abrizah O, Umi Salamah R (2005) Characterization of genes encoding key enzymes in oil synthesis in the oil palm. In: Proceeding of the PIPOC 2005 international palm oil congress (agriculture, biotechnology & sustainability), pp 583–606Google Scholar
  38. Masani MYA, Noll G, Parveez GKA, Sambanthamurthi R, Prüfer D (2013) Regeneration of viable oil palm plants from protoplasts by optimizing media components, growth regulators and cultivation procedures. Plant Sci 210:118–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Masani MYA, Noll G, Parveez GKA, Sambanthamurthi R, Prüfer D (2014) Efficient transformation of oil palm protoplasts by PEG-mediated transfection and DNA microinjection. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96831.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096831CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Masli DIA, Kadir APG, Yunus AMM (2009) Transformation of oil palm using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Oil Palm Res 21:643–652Google Scholar
  41. Masli DIA, Parveez GKA, Ismail I (2012) Optimisation of 2-deoxyglucose concentration for identifying the sensitivity level for oil palm embryogenic calli. J Oil Palm Res 24:1296–1302Google Scholar
  42. Masura SS, Parveez GKA, Ismail I (2010) Isolation and characterization of oil palm constitutive promoter derived from ubiquitin extension protein (uep1) gene. New Biotechnol 27:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masura SS, Parveez GKA, Eng Ti LL (2011) Isolation and characterization of oil palm constitutive promoter derived from translationally control tumor protein (TCTP) gene. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:701–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masura SS, Tahir NI, Rasid OA, Ramli US, Abrizah O, Masani AMY, Parveez GKA, Kushairi A (2017) Post-genomic technologies for the advancement of oil palm research. J Oil Palm Res 29(4):469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miki B, McHugh S (2004) Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: applications, alternatives and biosafety. J Biotechnology 107:193–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mohamad Arif AM, Masli DIA, Ramli Z, Yunus AMM, Mohammed S, Hwa LF, Wahab NA, Rasid OA, Sambanthamurthi R, Parveez GKA (2017) Biotechnology for diversification and improved resilience of the oil palm. Planter 93(1093):237–249Google Scholar
  47. Mookkan M, Nelson-Vasilchik K, Hague J, Zhang ZJ, Kausch AP (2017) Selectable marker independent transformation of recalcitrant maize inbred B73 and sorghum P898012 mediated by morphogenic regulators BABY BOOM and WUSCHEL2. Plant Cell Rep 36:1477–1491PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Morcillo F, Cros D, Billotte N, Ngando-Ebongue G-F, Domonhédo H, Pizot M, Cuéllar T, Espéout S, Dhouib R, Bourgis F, Claverol S, Tranbarger TJ, Nouy B, Arondel (2013) Improving palm oil quality through identification and mapping of the lipase gene causing oil deterioration. Nat Commun 4:2160.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Mubmann V, Serek M, Winkelmann T (2011) Selection of transgenic Petunia plants using the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 107:483–492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-9998-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murphy DJ (2014) The future of oil palm as a major global crop: opportunities and challenges. J Oil Palm Res 26:1–24Google Scholar
  51. Nakamura T, Ishikawa M (2006) Transformation of suspension cultures of bromegrass (Bromus inermis) by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 84:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nurazah Z, Idris AS, Mohd Din A, Mohamad Arif AM, Abrizah O, Ramli US (2017). A metabolic fingerprinting approach to assess metabolome changes in response to oil palm basal stem rot. In: Proceedings of the PIPOC 2017 international palm oil congress (agriculture, biotechnology & sustainability), pp 341–344Google Scholar
  53. Nurfahisza AR, Rafiqah MA, Masani MYA, Hanin AN, Rasid OA, Parveez GKA, Ismail I (2014) Molecular analysis of transgenic oil palm to detect the presence of transgenes. J Oil Palm Res 26:73–80Google Scholar
  54. Nurfahisza AR, Rafiqah MA, Parveez GKA, Rasid OA (2016) Comparison of the effectiveness of basta, bialaphos and glufosinate ammonium for selecting transformed oil palm tissues. J Oil Palm Res 28:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nurniwalis AW, Siti Nor Akmar A, Chan PL, Mohamad Arif MA (2007). Isolation of a cDNA encoding lipase class 3 family protein from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). In: PIPOC agriculture, biotechnology and sustainability conference, Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre (KLCC), Kuala Lumpur, August 26–30, pp 1011–1020Google Scholar
  56. Nurniwalis AW, Zubaidah R, Siti Nor Akmar A, Zulkifli H, Mohamad Arif MA, Massawe FJ, Chan KL, Parveez GKA (2015) Genomic structure and characterization of a lipase class 3 gene and promoter from oil palm. Biol Plant 59:227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-015-0500-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parveez GKA (2000) Production of transgenic oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) using biolistic techniques. In: Jain SM, Minocha SC (eds) Molecular biology of woody plants, vol 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 327–350Google Scholar
  58. Parveez GKA (2003) Novel products from transgenic oil palm. Ag Biotech Net 5:1–8 (ABN 113)Google Scholar
  59. Parveez GKA, Majid NA (2008) Factors affecting green fluorescence protein (GFP) gene expression in oil palm after microprojectile bombardment mediated transformation. J Oil Palm Res 20:495–507Google Scholar
  60. Parveez GKA, Chowdhury MKU, Saleh NM (1996) Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration of selection agents for oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) transformation. Asia Pac J Mol Biol Biotechnol 4:219–228Google Scholar
  61. Parveez GKA, Chowdhury MKU, Saleh NM (1997) Physical parameters affecting transient GUS gene expression in oil palm using the biolistics device. Ind Crops Prod 6:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parveez GKA, Chowdhury MKU, Saleh NM (1998) Biological parameters affecting transient GUS gene expression in oil palm embryogenic calli via microprojectile bombardment. Ind Crops Prod 8:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parveez GKA, Masnita MM, Alizah Z, Majid NA, Abdul Masani MY, Haliza HF, Rasid OA, Cheah SC (2000) Transgenic oil palm: production and projection. Biochem Soc Trans 28:969–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parveez GKA, Majid NA, Alizah Z, Rasid OA (2007) Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration of selection agents for selecting transformed immature embryos of oil palm. Asia Pac J Mol Biol Biotechnol 15:133–146Google Scholar
  65. Parveez GKA, Abrizah O, Nurhafizah R, Bahariah B (2010) Functional analysis of oil palm palmitoyl-acyl-ACP thioesterase (FatB) gene via down-regulation in a model plant: Arabidopsis thaliana. J Oil Palm Res 22:803–813Google Scholar
  66. Parveez GKA, Rasid OA, Masani MYA, Sambanthamurthi R (2015a) Biotechnology of oil palm: strategies towards manipulation of lipid content and composition. Plant Cell Rep 34(4):533–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parveez GKA, Bahariah B, Ayub NH, Masani MYA, Rasid OA, Tarmizi AH, Ishak Z (2015b) Production of polyhydroxybutyrate in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) mediated by microprojectile bombardment of PHB biosynthesis genes into embryogenic calli. Front Plant Sci 6:598.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00598
  68. Parveez GKA, Singh R, Ong-Abdullah M, Ramli US, Low ETL, Rasid OA, Manaf Mohamad Arif AM (2017) Impact of biotechnology on the sustainable development of the oil palm industry—from research to application. In: Proceedings of the PIPOC 2017 international palm oil congress (agriculture, biotechnology & sustainability), pp 77–86Google Scholar
  69. Paz MM, Shou H, Guo Z, Zhang Z, Banerjee AK, Wang K (2004) Assessment of conditions affecting Agrobacterium-mediated soybean transformation using the cotyledonary node explant. Euphytica 136:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pérez-Piñeiro P, Gago J, Landín M, Gallego PP (2012) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of wheat: general overview and new approaches to model and identify the key factors involved. In: Çiftçi YO (ed) Transgenic plants—advances and limitations, InTech, Croatia.  https://doi.org/10.5772/35232. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/transgenic-plants-advances-and-limitations/agrobacterium-mediated-transformation-of
  71. Promchan T, Te-Chato S (2013) Strains of Agrobacterium affecting gene transformation through embryogenic cell suspension of hybrid tenera oil palm. J Agric Technol 9(3):669–679Google Scholar
  72. Rai MK, Shekhawat NS (2014) Recent advances in genetic engineering for improvement of fruit crops. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 116:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rajanaidu N, Kushairi AD, Chan KW, Mohd Din A (2007) Current status of oil planting material in the world and future challenges. In: Proceedings 2007 PIPOC international palm oil congress, pp 503–520Google Scholar
  74. Ramli US, Abrizah O, Singh R, Ong Abdullah M, Sambanthamurthi R, Kushairi AD, Parveez GKA (2017) An integrative proteomics and metabolomics approach to oil palm research. In” Proceedings of the PIPOC 2017 international palm oil congress (agriculture, biotechnology & sustainability), pp 348–350Google Scholar
  75. Rasid OA, Wan Nur Syuhada WS, Nor Hanin A, Masura SS, Zulqarnain M, Ho CL, Sambanthamurthi R, Suhaimi N (2008) RT-PCR amplification and cloning of partial DNA sequence coding for oil palm (Elaeis oleifera) phytoene synthase gene. AsPac J Mol Biol Biotechnol 16:17–24Google Scholar
  76. Rasid OA, Parveez GKA, Ho CL, Suhaimi N, Sambanthamurthi R (2009) Plant carotenoids: molecular genetics and regulation. J Oil Palm Res 21:588–601Google Scholar
  77. Rasid OA, Wan Nur Syuhada WS, Nor Hanin A, Singh R, Ho CL, Parveez GKA (2014) Molecular cloning and regulation of oil palm (E. guineensis Jacq.) phyteone desaturase in developing mesocarp tissues. J Oil Palm Res 26:37–46Google Scholar
  78. Reed J, Privalle L, Powell ML, Meghji M, Dawson J, Dunder E, Sutthe J, Wenck A, Launis K, Kramer C, Chang YF, Hansen G, Wright M (2001) Phosphomannose isomerase: An efficient selectable marker for plant transformation. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roongsattham P, Morcillo F, Jantasuriyarat C, Pizot M, Moussu S, Jayaweera D, Collin M, Gonzalez-Carranza ZH, Amblard P, Tregear JW, Tragoonrung S, Verdeil JL, Tranbarger TJ (2012) Temporal and spatial expression of polygalacturonase gene family members reveals divergent regulation during fleshy fruit ripening and abscission in the monocot species oil palm. BMC Plant Biol 12:150.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Sambanthamurthi R, Parveez GKA, Cheah SC (2000). Genetic engineering of oil palm. In: Yusof B, Jalani BS, Chan KW (eds) Advances in oil palm research. Malaysian Palm Oil BoardGoogle Scholar
  81. Sambanthamurthi R, Rajinder S, Parveez GKA, Meilina OA, Kushairi A (2009) Opportunities for the oil palm via breeding and biotechnology. In: Jain SM, Priyadarshan PM (eds) Breeding plantation tree crops: tropical species. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, pp 377–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shah FH, Rashid O, Cha TS (2000) Temporal regulation of two isoforms of cDNAs clones encoding delta 9-stearoyl-ACP desaturase from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). Plant Sci 27:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Singh R, Meilina OA, Low ETL, Mohamad Arif AM, Rozana R, Rajanaidu N, Ooi CLL, Ooi SE, Chan KL, Mohd Amin H, Norazah A, Jayanthi N, Bacher B, Lakey N, Smith SW, He D, Hogan M, Budiman MA, Lee EK, Desalle R, Kudrna D, Goicoechea JL, Wing RA, Wilson RK, Fulton RS, Ordway JM, Martienssen RA, Sambanthamurthi R (2013) Oil palm genome sequence reveals divergence of interfertile species in Old and New worlds. Nature 500(7462):335–339Google Scholar
  84. Siti Nor Akmar A, Zubaidah R (2008) Mesocarp-specific metallothionein-like gene promoter for genetic engineering of oil palm. J Oil Palm Res (Spec Iss July):1–8Google Scholar
  85. Siti Nor Akmar A, Cheah SC, Nurniwalis AW (2014) Expression regulatory elements. Patent no: US8791330Google Scholar
  86. Siti Suriawati B, Chan PL, Chan KL, Parveez GKA, Rasid OA (2016) Meta analysis of multiple transcriptome data sets reveals mesocarp-specific genes in oil palm. In: 3rd international plant breeding conference, p 79Google Scholar
  87. Siti Suriawati B, Chan PL, Chan KL, Parveez GKA, Rasid OA (2017) Transcriptomic analysis reveals preferentially expressed genes in the mesocarp tissues of oil palm. In: Proceedings of the PIPOC 20017 international palm oil congress (agriculture, biotechnology & sustainability), pp 174–177Google Scholar
  88. Soh AC, Tan H, Ooi LH, Rajanaidu N, Cheah SC, Low FC (1994). Genetic improvement of plantation crops in Malaysia. In: Proceeding 1st national congress on genetics, pp 55–69Google Scholar
  89. Somers DA, Samac DA, Olhoft PM (2003) Recent advances in legume transformation. Plant Physiol 131:892–899PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Syahanim S, Abrizah O, Siti Nor Akmar A, Mohamad Arif AM, Ho CL (2007) Cloning of an oleoyl-Coa desaturase from oil palm. In: Proceedings of the PIPOC 2007 international palm oil congress (agriculture, biotechnology & sustainability), pp 1001–1009Google Scholar
  91. Tranbarger TJ, Dussert S, Joët T, Argout X, Summo M, Champion A, Cros D, Omore A, Nouy B, Morcillo F (2011) Regulatory mecha-nisms underlying oil palm fruit mesocarp maturation, ripening, and functional specialization in lipid and carotenoid metabolism. Plant Physiol 156:564–584PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Umi Salamah R, Sambanthamurthi R (1996) β–Ketoacyl-ACP synthase II in the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) mesocarp. In: Williams JP, Khan UM and Lem NW (eds) Physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology of plant lipids. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Toronto, pp 69–71Google Scholar
  93. Vain P, Worland B, Kohli A, Snape JW, Christou P (2000) Green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a vital screenable marker in rice transformation. Theor Appl Genet 9:164–169Google Scholar
  94. Wan Saridah WA, Laura BW, Chokyun RHA, Anthony JS, Umi Salamah R, Abdul Masani MY, Ghulam KAP, Ravigadevi S (2008) Acetyl-CoA carboxylase from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) mesocarp. J Oil Palm Res 2:97–107Google Scholar
  95. Wolt JD, Wang K, Yang B (2016) The regulatory status of genome-edited crops. Plant Biotechnol J 14:510–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wyman C, Kanaar R (2006) DNA double-strand break repair: all’s well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 40:363–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yenchon S, Te-chato S (2012) Effect of bacteria density, inoculation and co-cultivation period on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of oil palm embryogenic callus. J Agric Technol 8(4):1485–1496Google Scholar
  98. Zhang K, Raboanatahiry N, Zhu B, Li M (2017) Progress in genome editing technology and its application in plants. Front Plant Sci 8:177.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Zubaidah R, Siti Nor Akmar A (2005) The effects of metal ions on root-specific expression of the oil palm MT3-B gene promoter. In: Proceedings of the PIPOC 2005 International palm Oil congress, pp 1104–1110Google Scholar
  100. Zubaidah R, Siti Nor Akmar A (2010) Functional characterization of the oil palm type 3 metallothionein-like gene (MT3-B) promoter. Plant Mol Biol Rep 28(3):531–541. ISSN 0735-9640Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Omar Abdul Rasid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Subhi Siti Masura
    • 1
  • Ayub Nor Hanin
    • 1
  • Dayang Izawati Abang Masli
    • 1
  • Bahariah Bohari
    • 1
  • Mat Yunus Abdul Masani
    • 1
  • Ghulam Kadir Ahmad Parveez
    • 1
  1. 1.Malaysian Palm Oil BoardKajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations