Advertisement

Genetic Improvement of Oil Palm Through Recurrent Selection

  • Mohd Rafii YusopEmail author
  • Jalani Sukaimi
  • Mohd Din Amiruddin
  • Momodu Jalloh
  • Senesie Swaray
  • Oladosu Yusuff
  • Samuel Chibuike Chukwu
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the Compendium of Plant Genomes book series (CPG)

Abstract

Plant breeding, particularly oil palm, takes up to 20 years per cycle for phenotypic selection which is characterized by low planting densities and longer generations. This, however, has numerous consequences such as limited breeding intensity and reduced number of generations that can be reached in between two breeding stages. In the attempt to reconcile the rapid achievement of varietal outputs and the long-term improvement of the tropical tree crops programme, the recurrent selection schemes were adopted. This paper presents an overview of recurrent selection with emphasis on modified reciprocal recurrent selection which is widely used in oil palm. Based on this background, the objectives of this breeding method were highlighted, and some achievements recorded through the method were elaborated.

Keywords

Oil palm Recurrent selection Modified recurrent selection Population improvement 

References

  1. Acquaah G (2009) Principles of plant genetics and breeding. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  2. Adon B, Baudouin L, Durand-Gasselin T, Kouamé B (1998) Utilisation de matériel non amélioré pour la sélection du palmier à huile: l’origine Angola. Plantations, Recherche, Développement 5(3):201–207Google Scholar
  3. Bakoumé C, Ngando Ebongué G, Ajambang W, Ataga CD, Okoye MN, Enaberue LO, Konan JN, Allou D, Diabate S, Konan E, Etta CE (2016) Oil palm breeding and seed production in Africa. Proceedings of the international seminar on oil palm breeding and seed production and field visits, Kisaran, Indonesia, 29–30 September 2016Google Scholar
  4. Bangarwa KS (2017) Recurrent selection-definition and types: agriculture. Biotech Articles. https://www.biotecharticles.com/Agriculture-Article/Recurrent-Selection-Definition-and-Types-4144.html. Accessed July 2018
  5. Barcelos E, Rios SDA, Cunha RN, Lopes R, Motoike SY, Babiychuk E et al (2015) Oil palm natural diversity and the potential for yield improvement. Front Plant Sci 6:190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cochard B, Noiret JM, Baudouin L, Flori A, Amblard PH (1993) Second cycle reciprocal recurrent selection in oil palm, Elaeis guineensis Jacq. Results of Deli × La Mé hybrid tests. Oléagineux (Paris) 48(11):441–451Google Scholar
  7. Comstock RE, Robinson HF, Harvey PH (1949) A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability 1. Agron J 41(8):360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corley RHV, Tinker B (2003) The oil palm, 4th edn. Blackwell Science LTD, Oxford, p 562Google Scholar
  9. Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2008) The oil palm. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2016) The oil palm, 5th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidson L (1991) Management for efficient cost-effective and productive oil palm plantations. In: PORIM international conference progress prospects challenges towards the 21st century, Kuala Lumpur (No. D-0565). Unilever Plantation, September 9–14Google Scholar
  12. Durand-Gasselin T, Kouame Kouame R, Cochard B, Adon B, Amblard P (2000) Diffusion variétale du palmier à huile (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). OCL. Oléagineux Corps gras Lipides 7(2):207–214Google Scholar
  13. Gascon JP, De Berchoux C (1964) Caractéristiques de la production d’Elaeis guineensis (Jacq.) de diverses origines et leurs croisements. Application à la sélection du palmier à huile. Oléagineux 19(2):75–84Google Scholar
  14. Gascon JP, Jacquemard JC, Houssou M, Boutin D, Chaillard H, Kanga Fondjo F (1981) La production de semences sélectionnées de palmier à huile. Oléagineux 36(10):475–486Google Scholar
  15. Gascon JP, Guen VL, Nouy B, Kamga F (1988) Results of second cycle recurrent reciprocal selection trials on oil palm Elaeis guineensis Jacq. Oléagineux 43(1):1–7Google Scholar
  16. Hallauer AR, Darrah LL (1985) Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their application. Crit Rev Plant Sci 3(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartley CWS (1988) The oil palm, 3rd edn. Longman, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Hull FH (1945) Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn 1. Agron J 37(2):134–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacquemard JC, Meunier J, Bonnot F (1981) Genetic study of the reproduction of an Elaeis guineensis oil palm cross. Oleagineux 36(7):343–352Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins MT (1940) The segregation of genes affecting yield of grain in maize. J Am Soc Agron 32:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kushairi A, Mohd Din A, Rajanaidu N (2011) Oil palm breeding and seed production. In: Mohd Basri W, Choo YM, Chan KW (eds) Further advances in oil palm research. MPOB, Bangi, pp 47–101Google Scholar
  22. Meunier J, Gascon JP (1972) Le schéma général d’amélioration du palmier à huile à l’IRHO. Oléagineux 27(1):1–12Google Scholar
  23. Ngando-Ebongue GF, Ajambang WN, Koona P, Firman BL, Arondel V (2012) Oil palm. In: Technological innovations in major world oil crops, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp 165–200Google Scholar
  24. Okporie EO, Chukwu SC, Onyishi GC (2013) Development of high protein populations of maize (Zea mays L.) from three cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 3(2):22–26Google Scholar
  25. Pichel R (1956) L’amélioration du palmier à huile au Congo Belge. Bull Agron 14:59–66Google Scholar
  26. Rafii MY, Rajanaidu N, Jalani BS, Kushairi A (2002) Performance and heritability estimations on oil palm progenies tested in different environments. J Oil Palm Res 14(1):15–24Google Scholar
  27. Rajanaidu N, Kushairi A, Rafii M, Mohd Din A, Maizura I, Jalani BS (2000) Oil palm breeding and genetic resources. Advances in oil palm research, pp 171–237Google Scholar
  28. Rajanaidu N, Ainul MM, Kushairi A, Mohd Din A (2013) Historical review of oil palm breeding for the past 50 years—Malaysian journey. In: Proceedings of the international seminar on oil palm breeding—yesterday, today and tomorrow, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 11–28Google Scholar
  29. Rosenquist EA (1990) An overview of breeding technology and selection in Elaeis guineensis. In: 1989 PORIM international palm oil development conference. Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (No. L-0076). PORIM, 5–9 September 1989Google Scholar
  30. Singh BD (2012) Plant breeding: principles and methods. Kalyani Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  31. Soh AC (1999) Breeding plans and selection methods in oil palm. In: Proceedings of symposium on the science of oil palm breeding. Montpellier, Francia (No. L-0435). PORIMGoogle Scholar
  32. Soh AC, Wong G, Hor TY, Tan CC, Chew PS (2003) Oil palm genetic improvement. Plant Breed Rev 22:165–220Google Scholar
  33. Soh AC, Mayes S, Roberts J (2017) Oil palm breeding: genetics and genomics. Oil palm breeding: genetics and genomics.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315119724
  34. Souza CL Jr (2001) Melhoramento de espéciesalógamas. In: Nass LL, Valois ACC, Melo IS, Valadares-Inglis MC (eds) Recursosgenéticos e melhoramento: plantas. Fundação MT, Rondonópolis, pp 159–199Google Scholar
  35. Sparnaaij LD, Menendez T, Blaak G (1963) Breeding and inheritance in the oil palm (ElaeisguineensisJacq.) Part I the design of a breeding programme. J West Afr Inst Oil Palm Res 4:126–155Google Scholar
  36. Sritharan K, Subramaniam M, Arulandoo X, Yusop MR (2017) Yield and bunch quality component comparison between two-way crosses and multi-way crosses of DxP oil palm progenies. Sains Malaysiana 46(9):1587–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Vossen HAM (1974) Towards more efficient selection for oil yield in the oil palm (Elaeisguineensis Jacquin). Thesis, Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohd Rafii Yusop
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Jalani Sukaimi
    • 2
  • Mohd Din Amiruddin
    • 3
  • Momodu Jalloh
    • 1
  • Senesie Swaray
    • 1
  • Oladosu Yusuff
    • 1
  • Samuel Chibuike Chukwu
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food SecurityUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversiti Sains Islam MalaysiaBandar Baru NilaiMalaysia
  3. 3.Malaysian Palm Oil BoardKajangMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of Crop Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  5. 5.Department of Crop Production and Landscape ManagementEbonyi State UniversityAbakalikiNigeria

Personalised recommendations