Skip to main content

Math Puzzles as Learning Devices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Math Cognition

Part of the book series: Mathematics in Mind ((MATHMIN))

Abstract

As Polya (1957) cogently argued, the use of puzzles and games has always been part of doing and learning mathematics since its emergence as an autonomous discipline (see also Parker 1955; Gardner 1998). The reason for this long-standing pedagogical practice may be that puzzles stimulate the imagination more so than any other type of mental faculty and are thus likely to be highly effective devices at various stages of the learning process. The purpose of this chapter is to consider the cognitive reasons supporting this implicit pedagogical principle. The use of puzzles and games in math education can be called, for the sake of convenience, educational recreational mathematics (ERM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J. (2012). On the cognitive and semiotic structure of mathematics. In: M. Bockarova, M. Danesi, and R. Núñez (eds.), Semiotic and cognitive science essays on the nature of mathematics, pp. 1-34. Munich: Lincom Europa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, E. M., Jung-Beeman, M., Fleck, J. and Kounios, J. (2005). New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 322-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell-Landsittell, T. (2005). Puzzled by math! Using puzzles to teach math skills. Waco: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, A., Hindrichs, T., Morsy, H., and Wegener, I. (1994). Solution of the knight’s Hamiltonian path problem on chessboards. Discrete Applied Mathematics 50: 125-134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (2003). Second language teaching: A view from the right side of the brain. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (2018). Ahmes’ legacy: Puzzles and the mathematical mind. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. 1970. Lateral thinking: Creativity step-by-step. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grazia, J. (1981). Math tricks, brain twisters & puzzles. New York: Bell Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibonacci, L. (1202/2002). Liber abaci, trans. by L. E. Sigler. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (1979). Aha! Insight! New York: Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1982a). Art, mind, and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (1982b). Gotcha! Paradoxes to puzzle and delight. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (1998). A quarter century of recreational mathematics. Scientific American 279: 68-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, J. and Singmaster, D. (1992). Problems to sharpen the young. Mathematics Gazette 76: 102-126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, T. and Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30: 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E. F., Falkner, N., Sooriamurthi, R., and Michalewicz, Z. (2014). Guide to teaching puzzle-based learning. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovich, I. (2015). The puzzle universe: A history of mathematics in 315 puzzles. Buffalo: Firefly Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. (1955). The use of puzzles in teaching mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher 48: 218-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkovic, M. S. 2009. Famous puzzles of great mathematicians. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, H. (2012). Puzzles in math education. http://blog.mathedpage.org/2012/05/puzzles-in-math-education.html.

  • Polya, G. 1957. How to solve it. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, F. (1968). The master book of mathematical recreations. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, C. W. (1978). What Is Recreational Mathematics? Mathematics Magazine 51: 18-21.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tierre. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1961). Thought and language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel Danesi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Danesi, M. (2019). Math Puzzles as Learning Devices. In: Danesi, M. (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Math Cognition. Mathematics in Mind. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22537-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics