Skip to main content

The Development of Green Finance by Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rise of Green Finance in Europe

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance ((SIF))

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the development of green finance by sector. To this extent, it first examines the role of multilateral development banks in launching and fostering green finance and sustainable finance. Hence, it assesses the approaches adopted by industrial companies to embrace sustainable finance, in particular as concerns the implementation of sustainability and environmental reporting. Finally, it deals with the greening of private financial institutions (in particular, banks), underlying their crucial role in facilitating the development of green finance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given the significant market failures involved in shifting investment into sustainable infrastructure in particular in the Caribbean and in Latin America, and the fact that the region is in the midst of an economic downturn, development banks are essential to filling a USD 260 billion dollar annual infrastructure gap and a USD 110 billion dollar annual gap in financing for climate change (Yuan and Gallagher 2015). MDB may play a significant role to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7 on infrastructure and SDG 9 on energy by investments in sustainable infrastructure and renewable energy. In this respect, Bhattacharya et al. (2015) argue that development banks can play an essential role to help move nations and regions from “business as usual outcomes” to “sustainable infrastructure outcomes”. Finally, MDB can help domestic financial institutions to integrate sustainability into their business by making financing dependent on the implementation of social and environmental sustainability guidelines for banks. IFC is already coordinating the development of financial sector sustainability regulations in some emerging countries and should continue to do so to support the sustainability case for the financial sector (Oyegunle and Weber 2015). For more details on the Sustainable Development Goals, see Chap. 1.

  2. 2.

    See also Chap. 1.

  3. 3.

    http://www.gabv.org/the-community/members/banks

  4. 4.

    www.gabv.org/about-us

  5. 5.

    https://www.unepfi.org/banking/bankingprinciples/

  6. 6.

    For more information on the initiatives in the EU to foster sustainable finance, see Chap. 6.

References

  • 3M. (2014, July 1). Environment, health, and safety standard. Retrieved from: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/731894O/waste-management-program-standard.pdf?&fn=WasteMgmntProgramStandard.pdf

  • 3M. (2017). 2016 Sustainability report. Retrieved from: http://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/sustainability-report/global-challenges/raw-materials/

  • African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Investment Bank, Inter-American Development Bank Group, Islamic Development Bank, and World Bank Group. (2018). Joint report on multilateral development banks’ climate finance. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangladesh Bank. (2011). Environmental risk management (ERM) guidelines for banks and financial institutions in Bangladesh. Retrieved from Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, A., Oppenheim, J., & Stern, N. (2015). Driving sustainable development through better infrastructure: Key elements of a transformation program. Retrieved from Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon – Climate change and financial stability. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Banking Regulatory Commission. (2012). Notice of the China banking regulatory commission CBRC on issuing the green credit guidelines. Beijing: China Banking Regulatory Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, R. K. (2018). Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Bangladeshi banks. Waterloo: University of Waterloo. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/14208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J. (1998). The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world. Global Governance, 4(3), 295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y., Geobey, S., Weber, O., & Lin, H. (2018). The impact of green lending on credit risk in China. Sustainability, 10(6), 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Walling, P., & Batterman, S. A. (1997). Environmental reporting by the fortune 50 firms. Environmental Management, 21(6), 865–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont-Enzer, M. (2014, April 2). Why is South Africa leading the integrated reporting debate? Retrieved from: http://publisher.enablon.com/blog/why-is-south-africa-leading-the-integrated-reporting-debate/

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks. London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU High Level Expert Group in Sustainable Finance. (2018). Financing a sustainable European economy. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: Integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. The Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M. (2012). The development and state of research on social and environmental reporting in global comparison. Journal Für Betriebswirtschaft, 62(1), 45–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghio, N. (2015, April 21). New report once again shows danger of MDB financing for large fossil fuel projects. Retrieved from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nicole-ghio/new-report-once-again-sho_b_7102638.html

  • Global Reporting Initiative. (2018). Retrieved from: http://database.globalreporting.org/

  • Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? whose value? whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2000). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI and SASB take next step in cooperation. (2017, May 4). Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/information/news-and-press-center/Pages/GRI-and-SASB-take-next-steps-in-cooperation.aspx

  • Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2017). Investor implications of divesting from fossil fuels. Global Finance Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.10.004.

  • Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2006). Corporate sustainability reporting: An overview. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and reporting (pp. 301–324). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Houldin, M. (2001). Overview. In R. Gray, J. Bebbington, & D. Walters (Eds.), Accounting for the environment. London: Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C., & Weber, O. (2019). Fossil fuel divestment strategies: Financial and carbon related consequences. Organization and Environment, 32(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026618773985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Initiative, C. B. (2018). Bonds and climate change – The state of the market 2018. London: Climate Bonds Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants in England Wales. (2003). Information for better markets new reporting models for business. London: ICAEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Finance Corporation. (2011). Update of IFC’s policy and performance standards on environmental and social sustainability, and access to information policy. Retrieved from Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Finance Corporation. (2012). IFC performance standards on environmental and social sustainability (p. 72). Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation. http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ifc+sustainability/publications/publications_handbook_pps.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO. (2017). International organization for standardization. Retrieved from: https://www.iso.org/home.html

  • Kaya, I. (2016). The mandatory social and environmental reporting: Evidence from France. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodorkovsky, M. (2008, September 29). Etymology of company. Retrieved from: https://www.altalang.com/beyond-words/2008/09/29/etymology-of-companion/

  • KPMG. (2003). Building a new reporting and communications model: A new source of competitive advantage. Melbourne: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2011). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurucz, E. C., Colbert, B. A., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, & J. Moon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (1st ed., pp. 83–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kynge, J., & Hook, L. (2018, December 12). Development bank halts coal financing to combat climate change. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labatt, S., & White, R. R. (2007). Carbon finance. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. F., & Thomas, W. L. (2004). The equator principles and project finance: Sustainability in practice? Natural Resources and Environment, 19(2), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K. I. (2010). The devil is in the (bio)diversity: Private sector engagement and the “restructuring” of biodiversity conservation. Antipode, 42(3), 513–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. (2003). Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercure, J. F., Pollitt, H., Viñuales, J. E., Edwards, N. R., Holden, P. B., Chewpreecha, U., et al. (2018). Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets. Nature Climate Change. Retrieved from doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0182-1.

  • Nattrass, B., & Altomare, M. (1999). The natural step for business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolet, G., Vosmer, W., de Bruijn, M., & Braly-Cartillier, I. (2014). Managing environmental and social risks, a roadmap for National Development Banks in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from Washington, DC. http://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/6437/CMF%20MON%20Managing%20Environmental%20and%20Social%20Risks.pdf?sequence=1

  • Orlitzky, M. (2008). Corporate social performance and financial performance: A research synthesis. In A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. L., & O’Dwyer, B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The reporting assurance dimension. In A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyegunle, A., & Weber, O. (2015). Development of sustainability and green banking regulations – Existing codes and practices (65). Retrieved from Waterloo. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/development-of-sustainability-and-green-banking-regulations-existing-codes-and-practice

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – And unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, H. (2010). Green bonds: A model to mobilise private capital to fund climate change mitigation and adaptation projects. The EuroMoney Environmental Finance Handbook, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. J., & Cragg, W. (2010). Being virtuous and prosperous: SRI’s conflicting goals. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0632-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikhardson, P., Bennett, M., Bouma, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2005). Environmental management accounting: Innovation or managerial fad? In P. Rikhardsson, M. Bennett, J. Bouma, & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Implementing environmental management accounting. Status and challenges (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. (Ed.). (2000). World resources 2000–2001: People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2006). Corporate sustainability accounting: A nightmare or a dream coming true? Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 293–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SDG Compass. (2017). The goals. Retrieved from: https://sdgcompass.org/sdgs/

  • Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Basel: Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Equator Principles. (2013). The equator principles. Retrieved from Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP Finance Initiative. (2018). Principles for responsible banking – Shaping our future. Geneva: UNEP Finance Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD. (2017). World business council for sustainable development. Retrieved from: http://www.wbcsd.org/

  • Weber, O. (2014). Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(5), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785.

  • Weber, O. (2016a). Equator principles reporting: Factors influencing the quality of reports. International Journal of Corporate Strategy and Social Responsibility, 1(2), 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O. (2016b). Impact investing. In O. M. Lehner (Ed.), Routledge handbook on social and sustainable finance (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O. (2017). Corporate sustainability and financial performance of Chinese banks. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O. (2018). Financial sector sustainability regulations and voluntary codes of conduct: Do they help to create a more sustainable financial system? In T. Walker, S. D. Kibsey, & R. Crichton (Eds.), Designing a sustainable financial system: Development goals and socio-ecological responsibility (pp. 383–404). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., & Acheta, E. (2014). The equator principles: Ten teenage years of implementation and a search for outcome (CIGI papers series) (p. 20). Waterloo: CIGI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., & Oni, O. (2015). The impact of financial sector sustainability regulations on banks (65). Retrieved from Waterloo, ON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., & Saravade, V. (2019). Green bonds – Current development and their future (p. 32). Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., Fenchel, M., & Scholz, R. W. (2008a). Empirical analysis of the integration of environmental risks into the credit risk management process of European banks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., Koellner, T., Habegger, D., Steffensen, H., & Ohnemus, P. (2008b). The relation between the GRI indicators and the financial performance of firms. Progress in Industrial Ecology, 5(3), 236–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., Hoque, A., & Islam, A. M. (2015). Incorporating environmental criteria into credit risk management in Bangladeshi banks. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(1–2), 1–15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1008736.

  • Westphal, M. I., Canfin, P., Ballesteros, A., & Morgan, J. (2015). Getting to $100 billion: Climate finance scenarios and projections to 2020. Retrieved from Washington, DC: http://www.wri.org/publication/getting-100-billion-climate-finance-scenarios-and-projections-2020

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C., & Rwabizambuga, A. (2006). Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: An examination of the equator principles. Business and Society Review, 111(1), 89–117. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00263.x.

  • Yang, A., & Cui, Y. (2012). Global coal risk assessment: Data analysis and market research. Retrieved from Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., & Gallagher, K. P. (2015). Greening development finance in the Americas. Retrieved from Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Yang, Y., & Bi, J. (2011). Tracking the implementation of green credit policy in China: Top-down perspective and bottom-up reform. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(4), 1321–1327. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479710004639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Weber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weber, O., ElAlfy, A. (2019). The Development of Green Finance by Sector. In: Migliorelli, M., Dessertine, P. (eds) The Rise of Green Finance in Europe. Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22510-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22510-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22509-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22510-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics