Advertisement

A Systems Approach to Comprehend Public Sector (Government) Accounting

  • Konstantin TimoshenkoEmail author
  • Chamara Kuruppu
  • Imtiaz Badshah
  • Dayananda Ambalangodage
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 78)

Abstract

The present paper seeks to elaborate a framework for investigating public sector (government) accounting in terms of its relationship with the traditional budget. Indeed, a global shift towards a more accountable public sector under the banner of New Public Management in general and accrual accounting in particular is somehow expected to encroach on this relationship, gaining a strong impetus to research it. By employing a conceptual framework for what accountants do or are anticipated to do, we first examine accounting as a system of interrelated elements. We then turn our attention to exploring the nature of the relationship between the budget and accounting in the light of the machine metaphor. Thereafter, some empirical evidence on the topic is succinctly reviewed as reflected in the literature. We end this paper by posing some questions to be addressed in future studies.

Keywords

Public sector (government) accounting Budgeting Systems approach 

References

  1. 1.
    American Accounting Association (AAA): Statement of Accounting Theory and Theory Acceptance (1977)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA): Objectives of Financial Statements (1973)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA): Objectives of Financial Statements, vol. 2, Selected Papers, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anthony, R., Young, D.: Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations. Irwin, Homewood (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belkaoui, A.: Accounting Theory, 5th edn. Cengage Learning EMEA, London (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergevärn, L., Mellemvik, F., Olson, O.: Institutionalization of accounting – a comparative study between Sweden and Norway. Scand. J. Manag. 11(1), 25–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A.G.: Accounting in its social context: towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Acc. Organ. Soc. 10(4), 381–413 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caiden, N., Wildavsky, A.: Planning and Budgeting in Poor Countries. Transaction, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpenter, V.L., Feroz, E.H.: Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US State governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Acc. Organ. Soc. 26, 565–596 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan, J.L.: Budget accounting in China: continuity and change. In: Chan, J.L., Jones, R.H., Lüder, K. (eds.) Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, vol. 9, pp. 147–174. JAI Press, Greenwich (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan, J.L.: Global government accounting principles. In: Bräunig, D., Eichhorn, P. (eds.) Public Management, Accounting Standards and Evaluation Methods. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan, J.L.: Government accounting: an assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Pub. Money Manag. 23(1), 13–20 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Czarniawska-Joerges, B., Jacobsson, B.: Budget in a cold climate. Acc. Organ. Soc. 14, 29–39 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, S., Menon, K., Morgan, G.: The images that have shaped accounting. Acc. Organ. Soc. 7(4), 307–318 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feldman, M., March, J.: Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Adm. Sci. Q. 26, 171–186 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flamholtz, E.: Accounting, budgeting and control systems in their organizational context: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Acc. Organ. Soc. 8(2/3), 153–169 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gaa, J.C.: User primacy in corporate financial reporting: a social contract approach. Acc. Rev. 61, 435–454 (1986)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gårseth-Nesbakk, L., Timoshenko, K.: The functions of accounting revisited – new meanings and directions, Chap. 9. In: Bourmistrov, A., Olson, O. (eds.) Accounting, Management Control and Institutional Development, pp. 141–156. Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Oslo (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Høgheim, S., Monsen, N., Olsen, R., Olson, O.: Two worlds of management control. Financ. Accountability Manag. 5(2), 163–178 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jönsson, S.: Accounting Regulation and Elite Structure. Willey, Chichester (1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laughlin, R.C., Puxty, A.G.: The decision-usefulness criterion: wrong cart wrong horse. Br. Acc. Rev. 13(1), 43–87 (1981)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lüder, K., Jones, R.: The diffusion of accrual accounting and budgeting in European governments – a cross-country analysis. In: Lüder, K., Jones, R. (eds.) Reforming Governmental Accounting and Budgeting in Europe, pp. 13–58. Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft, Frankfurt am Main (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    March, J., Olsen, J.: Democratic Governance. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mellemvik, F., Bourmistrov, A., Mauland, H., Stemland, J.: Sluttrapport for Prosjektet: Regnskap i Offentlig (Kommunal) Sektor. Høgskolen i Bodø, Bodø (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mellemvik, F., Monsen, N., Olson, O.: Functions of accounting – a discussion. Scand. J. Manag. 4(3/4), 101–119 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mellemvik, F.: Accounting: the hidden collage? Accounting in the dialogues between a city and its financial institutions. Scand. J. Manag. 13(2), 191–207 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miller, P., O’Leary, T.: Governing the calculable person. In: Hopwood, A., Miller, P. (eds.) Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice, pp. 98–115. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miller, P.: Accounting as social and institutional practice: an introduction. In: Hopwood, A., Miller, P. (eds.) Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice, pp. 1–39. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morgan, G.: Images of Organizations. Sage, Beverly Hills (1986)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Olsen, R.: Ex-Post accounting in incremental budgeting: a study of Norwegian municipalities. Scand. J. Manag. 13(1), 65–75 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Olson, O., Guthrie, J., Humphrey, C.: Global Warning: Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag, Oslo (1998)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Olson, O.: Accounting in a context of financial crisis – three research questions, Chap. 12. In: Bourmistrov, A., Olson, O. (eds.) Accounting, Management Control and Institutional Development, , pp. 193–197. Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Oslo (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roberts, J., Scapens, R.: Accounting systems and systems of accountability – understanding accounting systems in their organizational contexts. Acc. Organ. Soc. 10(4), 443–456 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Roberts, J.: The possibilities of accountability. Acc. Organ. Soc. 16(4), 355–368 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Timoshenko, K., Adhikari, P.: A two-country comparison of public sector accounting reforms: same ideas, different paths? J. Pub. Budg. Acc. Financ. Manag. 22(4), 449–486 (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Timoshenko, K., Adhikari, P.: Exploring Russian central government accounting in its context. J. Acc. Organ. Change 5(4), 490–513 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Timoshenko, K., Adhikari, P.: Implementing public sector accounting reform in Russia: evidence from one university. In: Tsamenyi, M., Uddin, S. (eds.) Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, vol. 9, pp. 169–192. Emerald Group Publishing House, Bingley (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Timoshenko, K.: Accountability and accounting: insights from Russian public sector reform. In: Farazmand, A. (ed.) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Timoshenko, K.: Russian public sector reform: the impact on university accounting. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 9(2), 133–144 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vela, J.M., Fuertes, I.: Local government accounting in Europe: a comparative approach. In: Caperchione, E., Mussari, R. (eds.) Comparative Issues in Local Government Accounting. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Watts, R.L., Zimmerman, J.L.: Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice Hall, London (1986)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Welsh, G.: Budgeting: Profit Planning and Control. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1976)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wildavsky, A.: Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Process. Little Brown, New York (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantin Timoshenko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chamara Kuruppu
    • 2
  • Imtiaz Badshah
    • 3
  • Dayananda Ambalangodage
    • 4
  1. 1.Nord UniversityBodøNorway
  2. 2.University of South-Eastern NorwayKongsbergNorway
  3. 3.Østfold University CollegeHaldenNorway
  4. 4.University of Sri JayewardenepuraNugegodaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations