Advertisement

Scientific Researches Analysis in Digital Multitasking Field of Educational Process in Modern Universities and Determination of New Conceptual Boundaries of It

  • Tatyana Vasilyevna LyubovaEmail author
  • Gulnara Tavkilievna Gilfanova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 78)

Abstract

This paper is a review of recent researches on digital multitasking. Claiming that digital technologies are changing the traditional roles of a teacher and a student, we must clearly understand a kind of effects arised at the moment digital technologies are used in the classroom. Moreover, the methods of applying digital technologies for the success of students’ academic progress are not always obvious to the teacher himself. The goal of the research analysis on digital multitasking in education problem is to identify shifts in settings and accents from the operationalism methodology to attempts of application of analytical philosophy of consciousness methodology and/or postmodern philosophy. This allows us to analyze the intentions, motives of the educational process participants and thereby define new conceptual boundaries of digital multitasking.

Keywords

Digitalization Multitasking Digital technologies Cognitive overload Prefrontal cortex Flexibility Syndrome of the limbic system iGeneration 

References

  1. Allen, D., Shoard, M.: Spreading the load: mobile information and communications technologies and their effect on information overload. Inf. Res. 10(2), 227 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Bawden, D., Robinson, L.: The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. J. Inf. Sci. XX(X), 1–12 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. Bilyalova, A.A., Lyubova, T.V., Valeeva, A.R.: Multicultural education and its targets in the process of intercultural competence formation: (based on foreign languages teaching experience). Int. J. Sci. Study 5(6), 93–96 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. Chang, S., Ley, K.: A learning strategy to compensate for cognitive overload in online learning. J. Interac. Online Learn. 5(1), 104–117 (2006). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/5.1.8.pdf
  5. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, J.M., Sancho-Vinuesa, T.: The Internet in face-to-face higher education: can interactive learning improve academic achievement? Br. J. Edu. Technol. 45(1), 149–159 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foehr, U.: Media Multitasking Among American Youth: Prevalence, Predictors and Pairings. Henry, J.: Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park (2006). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/7592.pdf
  7. Gasser, U., Palfrey, J.: Mastering multitasking. Educ. Leadersh. 66(6), 14–19. [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://cf.linnbenton.edu/wed/dev/hakek/upload/mutli1.pdf
  8. Gantz, J.F.: The Expanding Digital Universe: A Forecast of Worldwide Information Growth Through 2010. IDC, Framingham (2010). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/expanding-digital-idc-white-paper.pdf
  9. Greenfield, P.: Mind and Media: The Effects of Television, Video Games and Computers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.cdmc.ucla.edu/Mind_and_Media_files/MMCHP1.pdf
  10. Ignatov, N.Yu.: Multitasking and student performance. Open Distance Educ. 3(55), 5–11 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. Hembrooke, H., Gay, G.: The laptop and the lecture: the effects of multitasking in learning environments. J. Comput. High. Educ. 15(1), 46–64 (2003). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.ugr.es/~victorhs/gbd/docs/10.1.1.9.9018.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iqbal, S.T., Horvitz, E.: Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks (2007). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/horvitz/chi_2007_iqbal_horvitz.pdf
  13. Jones, Q., Ravid, G., Rafaeli, S.: Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inf. Syst. Res. 15(2), 194–210 (2004). http://www.ravid.org/gilad/isr.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, C., Shao, B.: The NET Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for Higher Education. Higher Education Academy, York (2011). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://oro.open.ac.uk/30014/
  15. Jungo, R.: In-class multitasking and academic performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(6), 2236–2243 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keen, A.: The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing Our Culture. Nicholas Bradley Publishing, London (2007). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.tc.umn.edu/~mill3239/home/presentations/panel3–1.pdf
  17. Kirsch, D.: Few thoughts on cognitive overload. Intellectica 1(30), 19–51 (2000). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://adrenaline.ucsd.edu/kirsh/Articles/Overload/Cognitive_Overload.pdf
  18. Levine, L.E., Waite, B.M., Bowman, L.L.: Can students really multitask? Comput. Educ. 54(4), 927–931 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lavie, N.: Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9(2), 75–82 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McPeak, D.: Multitasking vs Switch-tasking (2013). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://inci-dent-prevention.com/ip-articles/multitasking-vs-switch-tasking-what-s-the-difference
  21. Medina, J.: Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School. Pear Press, Seatle (2008). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://ext100.wsu.edu/pierce/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2014/01/BrainRules-JohnMedina-MediaKit.pdf
  22. Ophir, E., Nass, C., Wagner, A.D.: Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US Am. 106(37), 15583–15587 (2009). [Electronic resource] Access mode:  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prensky, M.: From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays to 21st Century Learning. Corwin Press (2012). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://marcprensky.com/from-digital-natives-to-digital-wisdom
  24. Ravizza, S., Hambrick, D., Fenn, K.: Non-academic internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Comput. Educ. 10(4), 109–114 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosen, L.: Teaching the iGeneration. Educ. Leadersh. 68(5), 10–15 (2007). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb11/vol68/num05/Teaching-the-iGeneration.aspx
  26. Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A.: Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced task-switching while studying. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 948–958 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D., Evans, J.: Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27(4), 763–797 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanbonmatsu, D., Strayer, D., Medeiros-Ward, N., Watson, J.: Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PLoS ONE 8(1) (2013). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0054402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Savolainen, P., Mannering, F.: Effectiveness of motorcycle training and motorcyclists’ risk-taking behavior. transportation research record. J. Transp. Res. Board, 2031(2007), 52–58 (2008). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://trb.metapress.com/content/3332n8q718k25830
  30. Small, G., Vorgan, G.: Ibrain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind. Collins Living, NewYork (2008). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.barnesandnoble.com/sample/read/9780061340345
  31. Study: Multitasking Hinders Learning. eSchool News, 26 July 2006. [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.eschoolnews.com/2006/07/26/study-multitasking-hinders-learning
  32. Verhaeghen, P., Salthouse, T.: Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychol. Bull. 122(3), 231–249 (1997). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9354147 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Viadero, D.: Instant Messaging Found to Slow Students’ Reading. Education Week, 15 Aug 2008. [Electronic resource] Access mode: www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2008/08/27/01im.h28.html
  34. Willingham, D.: Have technology and multitasking rewired how students learn? Am. Educ. 34(2), 23–28 (2009). [Electronic resource] Access mode: http://er-ic.ed.gov/?id=EJ889151

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kazan Federal UniversityKazanRussia

Personalised recommendations