Skip to main content

Pastoralism and Achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A Missing Piece of the Global Puzzle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Climate ((SPCL))

Abstract

Integrity and productivity of ecosystem goods and services from rangelands are critical to the livelihoods of over a billion people worldwide. Pastoralists play a key role in the conservation and sustainable management of these important life-support systems. Yet, an increasing number of environmental, socio-economic, and political threats have jeopardized the integrity of rangelands and the security of this livelihood type, and hence stewardship of global natural rangeland systems. Sustainable pastoralism can synergistically link several sustainable development goals (SDG) as they are critical to achieving food security, resilient local and regional economies, cultural diversity, conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, carbon sequestration, land and water rehabilitation. Pastoralism has a cross-cutting role for stewardship of drylands and natural rangelands while also achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We show how single-sector economic development approaches of the past have led to loss of livelihoods, increased inequality and land degradation for many pastoral communities in developing countries. How can the SDGs help induce more integrated approaches, and what are the challenges and barriers to doing so? We also highlight recent tools and approaches that can help, including the benefits of developing integrated indicators for monitoring and measuring progress towards sustainable pastoralism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data extracted and analyzed from FAO Stats (2016). www.fao.org/faostat.

References

  • Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta E et al (2011) An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass Forage Sci 66(1):2–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Hounet Y, Brisebarre A-M, Guinand S (2016) Le patrimoine culturel du pastoralisme: perspective globale, identité étatique et saviors locaux au prisme des races locales au Maroc. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 35(2):357–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland Commission (1987) Our Common Future. UN World Commission on Environment and Development, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship. Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlet M, Hutchinson C, Reynolds J et al (eds) (2018) World atlas of desertification. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, p 180

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis DK (2016) The arid land: history, power, knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies J, Herrera P, Ruiz-Mirazo J, Mohamed-Katerere J, Hannam I, & Nuesri E (2016) Improving governance of pastoral lands: implementing the voluntary guidelines of responsible governance of tenure of lands, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security. FAO Governance of Tenure Technical Guide 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Deblitz C (2012) Feedlots a new tendency in beef production. Working Paper 2. Agri Benchmark Sheep and Beef Network, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Digard J-P, Landais E, Lhoste P (1993) La crise des societies pastorals: unregard pluridisciplinaire. Rév Élev Méd Vét Pays Trop 46:683–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson-Hudson R, Smith EA (1978) Human territoriality: an ecological reassessment. Am Anthropol 80:21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECOWAS (2017) ECOWAS stresses the need to obtain international transhumance certificates. Press release 30 march 2017. Economic Community of West African States, Niamey

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2014) Ecosystem services provided by livestock species and breeds, with special consideration to the contributions of small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Background Study Paper No. 66. Rome. www.fao.org/3/aat598e.pdf/

  • FAO (2016) Database of country statistics on agriculture in 2016. www.fao.org/faostat

  • FAO (2018) World livestock: transforming the livestock sector through the sustainable development goals. Rome. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conserv Biol 19(3):680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freier KP, Finck M, Schneider UA (2014) Adaptation to new climate by an old strategy? Modeling sedentary and mobile pastoralists in semi-arid Morocco. Land 3(3):917–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaty G, Aronson D, Salzman PC (1981) The future of pastoral peoples. In: Proceedings of conference 4-8 August 1980, Kenya. IDRC, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg R (1987) Settlement, pastoralism and the commons: the ideology and practice of irrigation development in northern Kenya. In: Anderson D, Grove R (eds) Conservation in Africa: people, policies and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Yu H, Dai A, Wei Y, Kang L (2017) Drylands face potential threat under 2 °C global warming target. Nat Clim Chang 7:417–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEO (2018) Overall performance review 6. The Global Environment Facility (GEF) Independent Evaluation Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • ILRI (2018) Making the case for livestock: economic opportunity. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi. www.whylivestockmatter.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen KI, Niamir-Fuller M, Bensada A, Waters-Bayer A (2019) A case of benign neglect: knowledge gaps in the sustainability of pastoralism and rangelands. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamuzora F, Franks T (2001) Dynamics of development interventions in Tanzania: from projects to direct budgetary support and livelihoods approaches. Unpublished report Institute of Development Management Mzumbe, Tanzania and Bradford Centre for International Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefatura del Estado (1995) Ley 3/95 de 23 de marzo, de Vias Pecurias. Official State Gazette no. 71 of 24 March 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Little PD (1985) Absentee herd owners and part-time pastoralists: the political economy of resource use in northern Kenya. Hum Ecol 13:131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little PD (1996) Pastoralism, biodiversity and the shaping of savanna landscapes in East Africa. Africa: J Int Afr Inst 66(1):37–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1161510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ly A, Niamir-Fuller M (2005) La proprieté collective et la mobilité pastorale en tant qu’alliées de la conservation: éxperiences et politiques innovatrices au Férlo, Senegal. IUCN/CEESP. IUCN Policy Matters No. 13, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainali B, Luukkanen J, Silveira S, Kaivo-oja J (2018) Evaluating synergies and trade-offs among sustainable development goals (SDGs): explorative analyses of development paths in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability 10:815. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGahey D, Davies J, Hagelberg N, Ouedraogo R (2014) Pastoralism and the green economy – a natural nexus? IUCN and UNEP, Nairobi. http://iucn.org/wisp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nexus Regional Dialogue Programme (2019). Water-energy-food nexus serves the SDGs. GIZ Berlin. https://www.nexus-dialogue-programme.eu/about/nexus-and-the-sdgs/. Accessed 15 Feb 2019

  • Niamir-Fuller M (1997) The resilience of pastoral herding in Sahelian Africa. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds) Linking social and ecological systems: institutional learning for resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 250–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Niamir-Fuller M (1999) Conflict management and mobility among pastoralists in Karamoja, Uganda. In: Niamir-Fuller M (ed) Managing mobility in African rangelands: the legitimization of transhumance. FAO and Beijer Institute for Ecological Economics. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 149–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niamir-Fuller M (2016) Towards sustainability in the extensive and intensive livestock sectors. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 35(2):371–387. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.issue.35.2.2521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niamir-Fuller M, Kerven C, Reid R, Millner-Guillland E (2012) Co-existence of wildlife and pastoralism on extensive rangelands: competition or compatibility? Pastor Res Pol Pract 2(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/20141-7136-2-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niamir-Fuller M, Turner MD (1999) A review of recent literature on pastoralism and transhumance in Africa. In: Niamir-Fuller M (ed) Managing mobility in African rangelands: the legitimization of transhumance. FAO and Beijer Institute for Ecological Economics. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 18–46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ouedraogo R, Davies J (2016) Enabling sustainable pastoralism: policies and investments that optimise livestock production and rangeland stewardship. Rév Sci téch 35(2):619–630. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.35.2.2544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Page N, Popa R (2013) Family farming in Romania. European Commission Consultations on Family Farming, Saschiz www.fundatia-adept.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid R, Galvin K, Kruska R (2008) Global significance of extensive grazing lands and pastoral societies: an introduction. In: Galvin K et al (eds) Fragmentation in arid and semi-arid landscapes: consequences for human and natural systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4906-4-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder P (1996) Livestock disease scenarios of mobile vs. sedentary pastoral systems. In: Proceedings of 3rd international technical consultations on pastoral development in Brussels. UNSO, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Yahdijan L, Havstad K, Aguilar MR (2017) Rangeland ecosystem services: nature’s supply and humans’ demand. In: Systems R (ed) Briske DD. Springer, New York, pp 467–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ, Shames SA, Friedman R (2013) Defining integrated landscape management for policy makers. EcoAgriculture policy focus no.10. EcoAgriculture Partners, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman N, Perevolotsky A (1994) Has intensive grazing by domestic livestock degraded the Old World Mediterranean rangelands? In: Arianoutsou M, Groves RH (eds) Plant-animal interactions in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmake S (2008) Vulnerability and impact of climate change in South Africa’s Limpopo River Basin. IFPRI discussion paper. IFPRI, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter JW (1987) Cattle and inequality: herd size differences and pastoral production among the Fulani of northeastern Senegal. Africa 57:196–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow BM, Bromley DW (1991) Co-management or no management: the prospects for internal governance of common property regimes through dynamic contracts. Oxf Agrar Stud 22:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift J, (1993) Dynamic ecological systems and pastoral administration. Abstracts of the workshop on new directions in African range management and policy. ODI/IIED/Commonwealth Secretariat, Woburn, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thébaud B (1988) Élevage et développement au Niger. International Labor Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2016) Sustainable pastoralism. United Nations environment assembly background paper for UNEA resolution L.24. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2015) The 2030 sustainable development agenda. United Nations, New York. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf.

  • United Nations (2015) The SDG indicators. United Nations, New York. https://undocs.org/A/RES/71/313

  • World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralism (2006) Pastoralism and the millennium development goals. WISP policy brief no. 1. WISP/IUCN/UNDP/GEF, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate the stimulating discussions and support from the International Rangeland Congress Steering Committee and the IYRP support group. EHS gratefully acknowledges the financial support from CONACYT (projects CB 2015-251388B, 293793, PDCPN-2017/5036).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Niamir-Fuller, M., Huber-Sannwald, E. (2020). Pastoralism and Achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A Missing Piece of the Global Puzzle. In: Lucatello, S., Huber-Sannwald, E., Espejel, I., Martínez-Tagüeña, N. (eds) Stewardship of Future Drylands and Climate Change in the Global South. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22464-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics