Abstract
In this chapter, we aim to develop a set of considerations regarding the status of child poverty as moral damage. This approach may enrich the perspectives centered on material and social aspects, by enhancing our understanding of the complexities involved in the experience of child poverty. The consideration of child poverty as a form of moral damage could offer a complementary theoretical tool to analyze how the classic binomial aggressor-victim changes its shape in systemic collective problems. Hence, the aggressor could be made of multiple hands; the damage could be understood as omission or enabling of some conditions; and the victims could be both aware or to some extent unaware of their conditions. In this sense, moral damage would work as a key concept of ethical reasoning, allowing us to identify instances of damage with and without conscious victims, as well as cases without one clear direct aggressor. Emphasizing the key role of moral damage for the ethical argumentation on child poverty may be especially useful to shift the focus to children and to their development. Thus, we will explore the mechanisms by which poverty specifically promotes parental neglect, and how this phenomenon creates developmental and intergenerational impacts that objectify, in a very concrete way, the nature of child poverty as moral damage. Based upon this exploration, we will delve into the basic lines of a resilience-centered approach to policy as a measure to make justice in the long term, which intends to protect the child’s integral development, and to prevent revictimizations, in the face of adversity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As a preliminary clarification, we will not explore the philosophical debate regarding the social construction of childhood, as doing so would surpass the scope of this chapter. For this reason, we will understand childhood as the concept that refers to the period of human life from zero to 18 years old, with an especial focus on young children and preadolescents.
- 2.
A deeper analysis on moral status and moral consideration can be found in Goodpaster (1993).
- 3.
We are aware of the open debate on the limits of the moral community and who deserves moral consideration, namely humans, non-human animals, nature, etc. The work developed by Velayos-Castelo (1996), as well as Tugendhat (1997), provides an in-depth look of these positions, from anthropocentric views to the deep ecology movement. However, given that the implementation of the idea of moral damage in this chapter is only concerned with child poverty, a deeper analysis would surpass the purpose of our main thesis here.
- 4.
A good study on the relation between damage, wrongness and moral emotions can be found in Nichols (2004).
Literature
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2010. Justifying the Capability Approach to Justice. In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, ed. Harry Brighouse and Ingrid Robeyns, 81–100. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Arteta, Aurelio. 2010. El mal consentido. La complicidad del espectador indiferente. Madrid: Alianza.
Axford, Nick. 2012. Exploring Concepts of Child Well-Being: Implications for Children’s Services. Bristol: Policy.
Barry, Christian, Matthew Lindauer, and Gerhard Øverland. 2014. Doing, Allowing, and Enabling Harm: An Empirical Investigation. In Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, ed. Tania Lombrozo, Joshua Knobe, and Shaun Nichols, vol. 1, 62–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cabezas, Mar. 2016. Child Psychological Abuse, Public Health and Social Justice: The Cinderella Law Debate. In Justice, Education and the Politics of Childhood, ed. Johannes Drerup, Gunter Graf, Christoph Schickhardt, and Gottfried Schweiger, 137–153. Switzerland: Springer.
Cabezas, Mar, Gunter Graf, and Gottfried Schweiger. 2014. Health, Justice, and Happiness During Childhood. South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (4): 501–511.
Cicchetti, Dante. 2010. Resilience Under Conditions of Extreme Stress: A Multilevel Perspective. World Psychiatry 9 (3): 145–154.
Cudd, Ann E. 2006. Analyzing Oppression. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cyrulnik, Boris. 2005. The Whispering of Ghosts: Trauma and Resilience. New York: Other Press Llc.
Erikson, Erik. 1950. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton and Co.
Feinberg, Joel. 1984. Harm to Others. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Finkelhor, David. 2008. Victimología infantil. In Violencia contra niños, ed. José Sanmartín, 155–222. Barcelona: Ariel.
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gewirtz, Abigail, and Jeffrey Edleson. 2007. Young Children’s Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a Developmental Risk and Resilience Framework for Research and Intervention. Journal of Family Violence 22 (3): 151–163.
Goldie, Peter. 2009. Thick Concepts and Emotion. In Reading Bernard Williams, ed. Daniel Callcut, 94–109. London/New York: Routledge.
Goodpaster, Kenneth E. 1993. Moral Consideration and the Environment: Perception, Analysis, and Synthesis. Topoi 12 (1): 5–20.
Gray, Sarah, Danielle Forbes, Margaret Briggs-Gowan, and Alice Carter. 2015. Caregiver Insightfulness and Young Children’s Violence Exposure: Testing a Relational Model of Risk and Resilience. Attachment & Human Development 17 (6): 615–634.
Masten, Ann S., and J. Douglas Coatsworth. 1998. The Development of Competence in Favorable and Unfavorable Environments: Lessons from Research on Successful Children. American Psychologist 53 (2): 205.
Medina, José. 2013. The epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nichols, Shaun. 2004. Sentimental Rules. On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgments. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Donnell, Deborah, Schwab–Stone Mary, and Adaline Muyeed. 2002. Multidimensional Resilience in Urban Children Exposed to Community Violence. Child Development 73 (4): 1265–1282.
Parfitt, Derek. 1984. On what matters. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schweiger, Gottfried, and Gunter Graf. 2015. A Philosophical Examination of Social Justice and Child Poverty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Spiekermann, Kai. 2014. Small Impacts and Imperceptible Effects: Causing Harm with Others. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (1): 75–90.
Thiebaut, Carlos. 2005. Mal, daño y justicia. Azafea. Revista de filosofía 7: 15–46.
Townsend, Peter. 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom. A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1997. Lecciones de ética. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Velayos-Castelo, Carmen. 1996. La dimensión moral del ambiente natural: ¿necesitamos una nueva ética? Granada: Comares.
Vetlesen, Arne J. 2005. Evil and Human Agency Understanding Collective Evildoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Werner, Emmy E. 1993. Risk, Resilience, and Recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai Longitudinal Study. Development and Psychopathology 5 (4): 503–515.
Zeanah, Charles H. 2009. Handbook of Infant Mental Health. New York/London: Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cabezas, M., Pitillas, C. (2019). Beyond the Material Wounds of Child Poverty: The Conceptualization of Child Poverty as Moral Damage. In: Brando, N., Schweiger, G. (eds) Philosophy and Child Poverty. Philosophy and Poverty, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22452-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22452-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22451-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22452-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)