Skip to main content

The ASSL Approach to Formal Specification of Self-managing Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Models, Mindsets, Meta: The What, the How, and the Why Not?

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11200))

  • 486 Accesses

Abstract

ASSL (Autonomic System Specification Language) is a framework dedicated to the development of self-managing systems whereby developers are helped with problem formation, system design, system analysis and evaluation, and system implementation. The bottom line is a special multi-tier approach to specification exposing a rich set of constructs allowing a system to be modeled by emphasizing different key aspects, but centering the model around special self-management policies. This article presents in detail the aforementioned mechanism together with the underlying semantics. As a case study, we also present ASSL specifications of self-managing behavior of prospective autonomous NASA space exploration missions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The ASSL specification of ANT_Ruler is not presented here. The interested reader is advised to refer to [25].

  2. 2.

    In general, FOLTL can be seen as a quantified version of linear temporal logic. FOLTL is obtained by taking propositional linear temporal logic and adding a first order language to it.

References

  1. Horn, P.: Autonomic computing: IBM’s perspective on the state of information technology, Technical report, IBM T. J. Watson Laboratory, 15 October 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. IBM Corporation: An architectural blueprint for autonomic computing, white paper, Fourth edition, IBM Corporation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Comput. 36(1), 41–50 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murch, R.: Autonomic Computing: On Demand Series. IBM Press, Prentice Hall (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vassev, E.: Towards a framework for specification and code generation of autonomic systems, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada, November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vassev, E.: ASSL: autonomic system specification language - a framework for specification and code generation of autonomic systems, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany, November 2009

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vassev, E., Hinchey, M.: Modeling the image-processing behavior of the NASA Voyager mission with ASSL. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology (SMC-IT 2009), pp. 246–253 IEEE Computer Society (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vassev, E., Hinchey, M., Paquet, J.: Towards an ASSL specification model for NASA swarm-based exploration missions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2008) - AC Track, pp. 1652–1657. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vassev, E., Mokhov, S.A.: Towards autonomic specification of distributed MARF with ASSL: self-healing. In: Lee, R., Ormandjieva, O., Abran, A., Constantinides, C. (eds.) Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications 2010. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 296, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13273-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Vassev, E., Hinchey, M., Nixon, P.: Prototyping home automation wireless sensor networks with ASSL. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Communications (ICAC2010). IEEE Computer Society (2010 to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srivas, M., Miller, S.: Formal verification of the AAMP5 microprocessor: a case study in the industrial use of formal methods. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Industrial-Strength Formal Specification Techniques (WIFT 1995), pp. 2–6. IEEE Computer Society (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Formal Methods Specification and Analysis Guidebook for the Verification of Software and Computer Systems, I: Planning and Technology Insertion. NASA, Washington, DC (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kowalsky, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Gener. Comput. 4(1), 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. IBM Corporation. Defining service-level objectives, Tivoli Software. IBM Tivoli. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TDS390/SH19-6818-08/en_US/HTML/DRLM9mst27.htm. Accessed 19 Aug 2009

  15. IBM Corporation: Policy Management for Autonomic Computing - Version 1.2, Tutorial. IBM Tivoli (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. The International Engineering Consortium, Specification and Description Language (SDL), Web ProForum Tutorials. http://www.iec.org. Accessed 2 Feb 2009

  17. Cheng, S.W., Garlan, D., Schmerl, B.: Architecture-based self-adaptation in the presence of multiple objectives. In: Proceedings of ICSE 2006 Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS 2006), China (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Read, D.: Utility theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman, Working Paper No: LSEOR 04-64, Department of Operational Research, London School of Economics, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leavens, G.T., Cheon, Y.: Design by contract with JML, Technical report, Formal Systems Laboratory (FSL) at UIUC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Banatre, J.P., Fradet, P., Radenac, Y.: Programming self-organizing systems with the higher-order chemical language. Int. J. Unconv. Comput. 3(3), 161–177 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrei, O., Kirchner, H.: A higher-order graph calculus for autonomic computing. In: Lipshteyn, M., Levit, Vadim E., McConnell, Ross M. (eds.) Graph Theory, Computational Intelligence and Thought. LNCS, vol. 5420, pp. 15–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02029-2_2

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Corradini, A., Montanari, U., Rossi, F., Ehrig, H., Heckel, R., Lowe, M.: Algebraic approaches to graph transformation - Part I: basic concepts and double pushout approach. In: Rozenberg, G. (ed.) Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformations. Foundations, vol. 1, pp. 163–246. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Knuth, D.E.: Backus normal form vs. Backus Naur form. Commun. ACM 7(12), 735–773 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Truszkowski, W., Hinchey, M., Rash, J., Rouff, C.: NASA’s swarm missions: the challenge of building autonomous software. IT Prof. 6(5), 47–52 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vassev, E., Hinchey, M.: ASSL specification and code generation of self-healing behavior for NASA swarm-based systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Workshop on Engineering of Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (EASe 2009), pp. 77–86. IEEE Computer Society (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vassev, E., Hinchey, M., Paquet, J.: A self-scheduling model for NASA swarm-based exploration missions using ASSL. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Workshop on Engineering of Autonomic and Autonomous Systems (EASe 2008), pp. 54–64. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vassev, E., Hinchey, M.: ASSL specification of emergent self-adapting for NASA swarm-based exploration missions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops (SASOW 2008), pp. 13–18. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Plotkin, G.D.: A structural approach to operational semantics, Report DAIMI FN-19, Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Baier, C., Katoen, J.-P.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Vassev, E, Hinchey, M., Quigley, A: Model checking for autonomic systems specified with ASSL. In: Proceedings of the First NASA Formal Methods Symposium (NFM 2009), pp. 16–25. NASA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bakera, M., Wagner, C., Margaria, T., Vassev, E., Hinchey, M., Steffen, B.: Component-oriented behavior extraction for autonomic system design. In: Proceedings of the First NASA Formal Methods Symposium (NFM 2009), pp. 66–75. NASA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported, in part, by Science Foundation Ireland grant 13/RC/2094 and co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund through the Southern & Eastern Regional Operational Programme to Lero - the Irish Software Research Centre (www.lero.ie).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Hinchey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vassev, E., Hinchey, M. (2019). The ASSL Approach to Formal Specification of Self-managing Systems. In: Margaria, T., Graf, S., Larsen, K. (eds) Models, Mindsets, Meta: The What, the How, and the Why Not?. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22348-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22348-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22347-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22348-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics