Advertisement

Effect of Firms’ Responsive Strategies in Crisis: Based on Big Data Analysis in Social Media

  • Xiaolun WangEmail author
  • Lin Liu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11589)

Abstract

In the age of social media, after a crisis event, firms will immediately take responsive actions and publicly announce what they do in news media, in order to attenuate the potential negative impact of crisis. Afterwards, the public in social media will freely discuss and deliver their opinions in the form of word-of-mouths (WOMs), which directly reflect their feeling of firms’ responsive strategy. Therefore, based on big data analysis in social media, we attempt to establish the link between crisis firms’ responsive actions and public perceptions reflected in online WOMs. Large quantities of secondary panel data are crawled from both search engine and social media. To obtain a robust result, we adopt Panel Vector Auto Regression model to conduct our data analysis. The results show that increased responsive strategies of crisis firms will lead to a significant increasement in the strength of online WOMs, while a more positive responsive strategy can significantly decrease the strength of online WOMs in contrary. Our research provides profound theoretical and practical contributions.

Keywords

Responsive strategy Firm crisis Social media Big data Online WOM 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (#71802108), Research Funds for Young Scholars in School of Economics & Management of NJUST (#JGQN1802), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (30918013104), Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Fund Project (#18YJC630099).

References

  1. 1.
    Coombs, W.T.: Parameters for Crisis Communication. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Hoboken (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hearit, K.M.: Corporate Apologia: When an Organization Speaks in Defense of Itself. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benoit, W.L.: Accounts, Excuses and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration. State University of Press, Albany (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marcus, A.A., Goodman, R.S.: Victims and shareholders: the dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Acad. Manag. J. 34(2), 281–305 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coombs, W.T.: An analytic framework for crisis situations: better responses from a better understanding of the situation. J. Public Relat. Res. 10(3), 177–191 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffin, M., Babin, B.J., Attaway, J.S.: An empirical investigation of the impact of negative public publicity on consumer attitudes and intentions. Adv. Consum. Res. 18(1), 334–341 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sweetser, K.D., Metzgar, E.: Communicating during crisis: use of blogs as a relationship management tool. Public Relat. Rev. 33(3), 340–342 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schultz, F., Utz, S., Goritz, A.: Is the medium the message perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relat. Rev. 37(1), 20–27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cleeren, K., Dekimpe, G., Helsen, K.: Weathering product-harm crises. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(2), 262–270 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siomkos, G.J., Kurzbard, G.: The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis management. Eur. J. Mark. 28(2), 30–41 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, S.: The public crisis sentiment management of listed company: an empirical analysis of Microblog’s effect. Master thesis, Central South University (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rozin, P., Royzman, E.B.: Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 5(4), 296–320 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pesaran, M.H., Binder, M., Hsiao, C.: Estimation and inference in short panel vector autoregressions with unit roots and cointegration. Econom. Theory 21(4), 5–69 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Enders, W.: Applied Econometric Time Series, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hendricks, K.B., Hora, M., Singhal, V.R.: An empirical investigation on the appointments of supply chain and operations management executives. Manag. Sci. 61(7), 1562–1583 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations