Advertisement

Multi-sided Platforms: A Business Model for BIM Adoption in Built Environment SMEs

  • Saeed BanihashemiEmail author
  • Hamed Sarbazhosseini
  • Sisira Adikari
  • Farshid Hosseini
  • M. Reza Hosseini
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11589)

Abstract

It has been cogently acknowledged that employing BIM in the built environment companies has delivered remarkable benefits such as enhanced HCI, superior visualization, precise documentation, integrated design, construction and project management processes. Yet, the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) enterprises involved are still lagging behind in embracing BIM into core practices of their projects. This is particularly evident in the case of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) where higher levels of BIM implementation need to be scrutinized. There is little evidence on how these SMEs perceive the role of BIM management, and to some extent, they apply this process in their projects. The limited financial and human resources of these SMEs make it difficult to keep up with such BIM adoption processes. Therefore, to address these challenges, this paper is to shed light on the potentials of applying the business strategy of Multi-Sided Platform (MSP) in the construction industry and adapting its conceptual model for managing BIM implementation in construction SMEs. Positioning BIM professional services in MSP model can enable these firms to focus on their core businesses while benefiting from the senior talents which offer immediate access to BIM industry best practices. The study contributes to the field by providing succinct information on MSP implementation and its adoption in AEC SMEs. The study contributes to the body of knowledge through positioning BIM management platform in a rather overlooked context namely SMEs. Practically, policy makers and stakeholders would also benefit from the findings in order to promote BIM adoption.

Keywords

BIM SMEs MSP Construction Built environment Conceptual model 

References

  1. 1.
    Hosseini, M.R., Banihashemi, S., Martek, I., Golizadeh, H., Ghodoosi, F.: Sustainable delivery of megaprojects in Iran: Integrated model of contextual factors. J. Manag. Eng. 34, 05017011 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banihashemi, S., Hassanabadi, M.S., Tahmasebi, M.M.: Applications of PRC (PDA, RFID, camera) in construction monitoring. In: Six International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-VI) “Construction Challenges in the New Decade” (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghoddousi, P., Poorafshar, O., Chileshe, N., Hosseini, M.R.: Labour productivity in Iranian construction projects: perceptions of chief executive officers. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 64, 811–830 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banihashemi, S., Tabadkani, A., Hosseini, M.R.: Integration of parametric design into modular coordination: a construction waste reduction workflow. Autom. Constr. 88, 1–12 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banihashemi, S., Hosseini, M.R., Golizadeh, H., Sankaran, S.: Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. Int. J. Project Manag. 35, 1103–1119 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hosseini, M.R., Banihashemi, S., Zaeri, F., Adibfar, A.: Advanced ICT Methodologies (AIM) in the Construction Industry. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology. IGI Global, Hershey (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eastman, C., Eastman, C.M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golizadeh, H., Banihashemi, S., Sadeghifam, A.N., Preece, C.: Automated estimation of completion time for dam projects. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 17, 197–209 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hosseini, M.R., Azari, E., Tivendale, L., Banihashemi, S., Chileshe, N.: Building information modeling (BIM) in Iran: an exploratory study. J. Eng. Project Prod. Manag. 6, 78–89 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forsythe, P.: The case for BIM uptake among small construction contracting businesses. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining. University of Technology Sydney (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodgers, C., Hosseini, M.R., Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R.: BIM within the Australian construction related small and medium sized enterprises: awareness, practices and drivers. In: Raidén, A., Aboagye-Nimo, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, vol. 691, p. 700. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Lincoln (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poirier, E., Staub-French, S., Forgues, D.: Embedded contexts of innovation: BIM adoption and implementation for a specialty contracting SME. Constr. Innov. 15, 42–65 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shelton, J., Martek, I., Chen, C.: Implementation of innovative technologies in small-scale construction firms: five Australian case studies. Eng. Constr. Architect. Manag. 23, 177–191 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Banihashemi, S.: The Integration of Industrialized Building System (IBS) with BIM: A concept and Theory to Improve Construction Industry Productivity. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shourangiz, E., Mohamad, M.I., Hassanabadi, M.S., Banihashemi, S.: Flexibility of BIM towards design change. In: 2nd International Conference on Construction and Project Management, IPEDR, pp. 79–83. ACSIT Press, Singapore (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oraee, M., Hosseini, M.R., Banihashemi, S., Merschbrock, C.: Where the gaps lie: ten years of research into collaboration on BIM-enabled construction projects. Constr. Econ. Build. 17, 121–139 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardin, B., McCool, D.: BIM and Construction Management: Proven Tools, Methods, and Workflows. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Banihashemi, S., Meynagh, M.M., Vahed, Y.K.: Developing IFC standards for implementing industrialized building system components into BIM applications. In: Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Construction and Project Management, ICCPM 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hosseini, M.R., et al.: BIM adoption within Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): an innovation diffusion model. Constr. Econ. Build. 16, 71–86 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hagiu, A., Wright, J.: Multi-sided platforms. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 43, 162–174 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khanzadi, M., Sheikhkhoshkar, M., Banihashemi, S.: BIM applications toward key performance indicators of construction projects in Iran. Int. J. Constr. Manag., 1–17 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    BSI: BS 1192: 2007+ A2: 2016. Collaborative production of architectural, engineering and construction information. Code of practice. BSI, London, UK (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Banihashemi, S., Ding, G., Wang, J.: Identification of BIM-compatible variables for energy optimization of buildings – a Delphi study. In: 40th AUBEA 2016 (Radical Innovation in the Built Environment), Cairns, Queensland, Australia, pp. 281–291 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Azhar, S.: Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 11, 241–252 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Babič, N.Č., Podbreznik, P., Rebolj, D.: Integrating resource production and construction using BIM. Autom. Constr. 19, 539–543 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Banihashemi, S., Ding, G., Wang, J.: Developing an artificial intelligence-based decision making tool for energy optimization of residential buildings in BIM. In: RICS COBRA AUBEA 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zuppa, D., Issa, R.R., Suermann, P.C.: BIM’s impact on the success measures of construction projects. Comput. Civil Eng., 503–512 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hosseini, M.R., Martek, I., Papadonikolaki, E., Sheikhkhoshkar, M., Banihashemi, S.: Viability of the BIM manager enduring as a distinct role: association rule mining of job advertisements. Constr. Eng. Manag. 144, 1–11 (2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Succar, B.: Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom. Constr. 18, 357–375 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Acar, E., Koçak, I., Sey, Y., Arditi, D.: Use of information and communication technologies by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in building construction. Constr. Manag. Econ. 23, 713–722 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    SMEAA: SME infographic illustrates vital role of sector in Australian economy. SME Association of Australia (SMEAA) (2011). http://www.smea.org.au/
  32. 32.
    Saridakis, G., Muñoz Torres, R., Johnstone, S.: Do human resource practices enhance organizational commitment in SMEs with low employee satisfaction? Br. J. Manag. 24, 445–458 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McGraw Hill: The Business Value of BIM in Australia and New Zealand: how Building Information Modelling Is Transforming the Design and Construction Industry. McGraw Hill Construction, Bedford (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    USCB: Economic Census of the United States. The United States Census Bureau (American Fact Finder) (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gibson, B., Rispoli, L., Leung, D.: Small, medium-sized and large businesses in the Canadian economy: measuring their contribution to gross domestic product in 2005. Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Seens, D.: SME Operating Performance. Industry Canada (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weyl, E.G.: A price theory of multi-sided platforms. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 1642–1672 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M.W.: Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84, 92 (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ling, D.: Complete Design Thinking Guide for Successful Professionals. Emerge Creatives Group, Singapore (2015)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D.: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2017)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Poirier, E.A., Staub-French, S., Forgues, D.: Assessing the performance of the building information modeling (BIM) implementation process within a small specialty contracting enterprise. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 42, 766–778 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
    Arayici, Y., Coates, P., Koskela, L., Kagioglou, M., Usher, C., O’Reilly, K.: BIM adoption and implementation for architectural practices. Struct. Surv. 29, 7–25 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wood, G., Davis, P., Olatunji, O.A.: Modelling the costs of corporate implementation of building information modelling. J. Financ. Manag. Property Constr. 16, 211–231 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hosseini, M.R., Namzadi, M., Rameezdeen, R., Banihashemi, S., Chileshe, N.: Barriers to BIM adoption: perceptions from Australian Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). In: 40th AUBEA 2016 (Radical Innovation in the Built Environment), pp. 271–280 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CanberraBruceAustralia
  2. 2.Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations