Skip to main content

European Citizenship: Between Formal Status and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenging European Citizenship

Abstract

European citizenship was expected to (finally) project to the supranational level the rights, faculties and obligations characteristic of national forms of citizenship. It was also hoped European citizenship would serve to establish a form of political membership beyond the state. Actual developments have turned out very differently. The formal enshrinement of the citizenship status carried with it some transformative power (reflected in rulings of the Court of Justice such as Martínez Sala, Grzelczyk and Ruiz Zambrano). At the same time, European citizenship would foster the creation of new socio-economic boundaries (in parallel to the affirmation of economic freedoms as battering rams with which to contest national regulatory practices) and lead to the consolidation of new external and internal borders, reflected in the emergence of precarious third country national statuses and of the exclusion marker of “economically inactive citizen”. European citizenship may have made national laws more “human”, but at the cost of rendering them far less “social”, and of socio-economic boundaries hardening after the removal of physical borders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Par. 53 of La Pergola’s Opinion: “The Treaty now thus embodies the idea of a common status which individuals, whose subjectivity is recognised in the law of the Union (see Art. 8 of the EC Treaty), acquire merely by being nationals of a member state. And it is a fertile idea: on the basis of the Union between member states, as historical experience teaches us, the union of peoples which the Treaties of Maastricht and Amsterdam envisage may grow and develop: the preamble to the Treaty on European Union refers to the decision to continue the process of creating an ever closer Union among the peoples of Europe”.

  2. 2.

    Indeed, it was named “Union citizenship” in the Maastricht Treaty. We have opted to use the concept of European citizenship as equivalent of Union citizenship also in this and in the remaining chapters of the book. One reason for this is substantive, in that we argue the case that individual rights and a European proto-citizenship already existed when the Maastricht Treaty was agreed by the Member States. Another reason is practical in that “European citizenship” is used not only by academics, but also invariably by EU institutions themselves, one example being the European Commission in its periodic reports on European citizenship.

  3. 3.

    If anything, this emphasis is something unusual in modern citizenship politics. In Weberian terms, modern citizenship was part of a whole, of the political economy of a bounded political community (Weber 1978, see also Barbalet 2010), yet this was not seen as the primary description of citizenship. Citizenship was not primarily economically oriented, but rather the expression of the political unity of the state—a sense of equal membership in a community of fate —and thus a counterbalance to social inequalities (Weber 1994: 103). The specific conception of European citizenship as concrete form of mobile and market participatory rights status was, then, arguably not rooted in citizenship thinking but rather in a market liberal understanding of the economy.

  4. 4.

    Explicitly, AG Geelhoed in Bidar (European Court of Justice 2005a: par. 28): “By placing emphasis on the fundamental character of EU citizenship, the Court makes clear that this is not merely a hollow or symbolic concept, but that it constitutes the basic status of all nationals of EU Member States, giving rise to certain rights and privileges in other Member States where they are resident (….)various social benefits which Member States previously granted to its nationals and to economically active persons under Regulations Nos 1612/68 or 1408/71 now have been extended to EU citizens who are lawfully resident in the host MemberState”.

  5. 5.

    Cassis de Dijon , (European Court of Justice 1979).

  6. 6.

    This is why the argument in favour of “open borders” is highly problematic. It does not only undermine itself, in the sense that were it to be implemented would result in a race to the bottom which would worsen the position of the weakest in society, including most migrants, but in the process injures the existing structures that set limits to the force of economic power. But see Carens (1987).

  7. 7.

    By commodification we refer to the transformation of peoples, goods, ideas or services into commodities, i.e., into objects which can be exchanged for money. Our use assumes that a good deal of the goods and services, and certainly all people and ideas are false commodities, i.e., they should not be open to be bought and sold. On the concept of false commodity, see Polanyi (1944).

  8. 8.

    The underlying macroeconomic model assumed that boosting profitability would result in the mid run in stronger capital investments, allowing periphery economies to be restarted.

  9. 9.

    It is important to notice that a similar trend can be noticed at the legislative level. On the one hand, we can observe the same concept of ‘economically active’ person popping up in the proposed ‘new settlement’ of the United Kingdom negotiated before Brexit, largely reflecting the practice followed by a good number of Member States. On the other hand, the trend towards a homogeneous personal status for all third country nationals has been reversed. We may notice the proliferation of different third country national statuses, with a varying breadth and scope, and with very different sets of rights and obligations. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that graduation is largely dependent on a criterion that is substantially connected to the concept of ‘economically active’, as rights and duties depend on the extent to which third country nationals are expected to ‘contribute’ to the European economy. It has indeed become part of the jargon of European institutions to speak of ‘high value’ migrants, referring to those with highly valued and demanded skills. The assumption being that there are also those with ‘low value’, for example seasonal workers. We return to the emergence of a plurality of third country statuses below (Sect. D).

  10. 10.

    Such a claim stands in need of qualification in view of the progressive “politicisation” of elections to the European Parliament (Galpin and Trenz 2018). There are clear signs that Europeans seem to be increasingly realising the extent to which decisions taken at the supranational level of government affect their lives. Still, it is significant that such politicisation is negative, and revolves around not concrete alternative policies (which are largely missing) but around membership to the European Union or to the Eurozone.

  11. 11.

    Albeit our argument is rather different from his, we have been inspired by the term coined by Kelemen (2011).

  12. 12.

    Whether this is the result of growing trust on the cumulated “technical” knowledge of the ECB, or rather signals mounting distrust in representative institutions or more simply, the lack of political agreement on how to organise the prudential supervision of Eurozone banks, is rather immaterial.

  13. 13.

    This section is much indebted to Stie (2012).

  14. 14.

    Article 108.3 TEEC determined the procedure to follow in a balance of payments crisis. It foresaw either multilateral financial assistance, or lacking an agreement to provide it, opened the way to Member States imposing (temporary and proportionate) unilateral restrictions on trade.

  15. 15.

    The usual line of reasoning goes as follows. Once states can be outvoted because the will of the Council is formed through qualified majority voting (that is, since the Single European Act), there is a loss in indirect democratic legitimacy (Weiler 1999: 68–80, 232).

  16. 16.

    Furthermore, Article 6, Section 3 of the Directive (European Communities 1988) read as follows: “The Commission shall submit to the Council, by 31 December 1988, proposals aimed at eliminating or reducing risks of distortion, tax evasion and tax avoidance linked to the diversity of national systems for the taxation of savings and for controlling the application of these systems. The Council shall take a position on these Commission proposals by 30 June 1989. Any tax provisions of a Community nature shall, in accordance with the Treaty, be adopted unanimously”.

  17. 17.

    The 2003 Directive was replaced in 2014 by a less unsatisfactory, but still far from perfect, Directive (European Union 2014c).

References

  • Alexy, Robert. 1992. Individual Rights and Collective Goods. In Rights, ed. Carlos Santiago Nino, 163–181. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Lucio Baccaro. 2012. Political Economy of the Sovereign Debt Crisis: The Limits of Internal Devaluation. Industrial Law Journal 41: 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dws029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bade, Klaus J. 2003. Migration in European History. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baquero, Julio. 2018. What’s Left of the Law of Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J. 2010. Citizenship in Max Weber. Journal of Classical Sociology 10 (3): 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X10371717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, Richard. 2008. Evaluating Union Citizenship: Belonging, Rights and Participation Within the EU. Citizenship Studies 12: 597–611. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1519910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, Christopher J., Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter. 2014. The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies 53: 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, Christopher J., Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter. 2015. The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, Mark. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callison, William. 2018. Ordoliberalism’s Trans-Atlantic (Un)Intelligibility: From Friedman and Eucken to Geithner and Schäuble. In Ordoliberalism, Law and the Rule of Economics, ed. Josef Hien and Christian Joerges, 49–70. Oxford: Hart Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, Joseph H. 1987. Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. The Review of Politics 49: 251–273. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1407506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carswell, Simon. 2010. The Big Gamble: The Inside Story of the Bank Guarantee. Irish Times, 25 September. Available at http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/weekend/2010/0925/1224279646952_pf.html.

  • Castiglione, Dario. 2009. Political Identity in a Community of Strangers. In European Identity, ed. Jeffrey T. Checkel and Peter Katzenstein, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Stephen. 2006. Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection? International Migration Review 40: 741–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayla, David, and Coralie Delaume. 2017. La fin de l’Union européenne. Paris: Michalon Editeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockfield, Arthur Francis. 1991. The Real Significance of 1992. In The Politics of 1992: Beyond the Single European Market, ed. Colin Crouch and David Marquand, 1–8. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Olivier. 2016. The History of European Electoral Reform and the Electoral Act 1976: Issues of Democratisation and Political Legitimacy. Luxembourg: European Parliament. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/563516/EPRS_STU(2016)563516_EN.pdf.

  • Council of Ministers. 1995. Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States Meeting Within the Council of 19 December 1995 Regarding Protection for Citizens of the European Union by Diplomatic and Consular Representations. OJ L 314, 73-76. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/1995/553/oj.

  • Crouch, Colin. 2012. The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, Jacques. 2004. Mémoires. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bank Research. 2014. The Dynamics of Migration in the Euro Area. Available at https://tinyurl.com/y2worhqh.

  • Dionigi, Maja Kluger, and Christel Koop. 2017. Investigation of Informal Trilogue Negotiations Since the Lisbon Treaty—Added Value, Lack of Transparency and Possible Democratic Deficit, Study for the European Economic and Social Committee. Available at https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/qe-01-17-783-en-n.pdf.

  • D’Oliveira, Hans-Ulrich Jessurun. 1995. Union Citizenship: A Pie in the Sky. In A Citizen’s Europe: In Search of a New Order, ed. Allan Rosas and Esko Antola, 58–84. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dølvik, Jon Erik, and Jelle Visser. 2009. Free Movement, Equal Treatment and Workers’ Rights: Can the European Union Solve Its Trilemma of Fundamental Principles? Industrial Relations Journal 40: 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2009.00542.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Kenneth. 2014. States, Debt, and Power: ‘Saints’ and ‘Sinners’ in European History and Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2008. On Life Support. The Economist, 4 October. Available at http://www.economist.com/node/12342156?story_id=12342156.

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 1980. Communication from the Commission Concerning the Consequences of the Judgment Given by the Court of Justice on 20 February 1979 in Case 120/78 (“Cassis de Dijon”). OJ C 256, 03.10.1980, 2–3. ELI: https://tinyurl.com/yanyq9bb.

  • European Commission. 1985a. Completing the Internal Market. White Paper from the Commission to the European Council (Milan, 28–29 June 1985). COM (85) 310 final, 14 June 1985. Available at http://aei.pitt.edu/1113/.

  • European Commission. 1985b. A People’s Europe. Reports from the Ad Hoc Committee. Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 7/85. http://aei.pitt.edu/992/.

  • European Commission. 1993. Report from the Commission on the Citizenship of the Union. COM (93) 702 final, 21 December 1993. Available at http://aei.pitt.edu/5025/.

  • European Commission. 2001. European Governance: A White Paper. COM (2001) 428 final. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/communication-white-paper-governance-com2001428-20010725_en.pdf.

  • European Commission. 2004. Fourth Report on Citizenship of the Union. COM (2004) 695 final, 26 October 2004. Available at http://aei.pitt.edu/45857/.

  • European Commission. 2015. Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/5-presidents-report_en.pdf.

  • European Commission. 2016a. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the Criteria and Mechanisms for Determining the Member State Responsible for Examining an Application for International Protection Lodged in One of the Member States by a Third-Country National or a Stateless Person. COM (2016) 270 final, 4 May 2016. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160504/dublin_reform_proposal_en.pdf.

  • European Commission. 2016b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Standards for the Reception of Applicants for International Protection (recast). COM (2016) 465 final. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160713/proposal_on_standards_for_the_reception_of_applicants_for_international_protection_en.pdf.

  • European Commission. 2016c. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Standards for the Qualification of Third-Country Nationals or Stateless Persons as Beneficiaries of International Protection, for a Uniform Status for Refugees or for Persons Eligible for Subsidiary Protection and for the Content of the Protection Granted and Amending Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 Concerning the Status of Third-Country Nationals Who Are Long-Term Residents. COM (2016) 466 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities. 1988. Council Directive 88/361/EEC of 24 June 1988 for the Implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty. OJ L 178, 8.7.1988, 5–18. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1988/361/oj.

  • European Communities. 1990a. Council Directive 90/365/EEC on the Right of Residence for Employees and Self-Employed Persons Who Have Ceased Their Occupational Activity. OJ L 180, 13.7.1990, 28–29. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1990/365/oj.

  • European Communities. 1990b. Council Directive 90/366/EEC on the Right of Residence for Students. OJ L 180, 13.7.1990, 30–31. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1990/366/oj.

  • European Communities. 1990c. Council Directive 90/364/EEC on the Right of Residence (for Nationals of Member States Who Do Not Enjoy This Right Under Other Provisions of Community Law and for Members of Their Families). OJ L 180, 13.7.1990, 26–27. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1990/364/oj.

  • European Communities. 1993. Council Directive 93/96/EEC of 29 October 1993 on the Right of Residence for Students. OJ L 317, 18.12.1993, 59–60. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1993/96/oj.

  • European Council. 2012a. Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20399/st00tscg26_en12.pdf.

  • European Council. 2012b. Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism. https://www.esm.europa.eu/sites/default/files/20150203_-_esm_treaty_-_en.pdf.

  • European Council. 2016a. EU-Turkey Statement, 18 March 2016. Available at https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkey-statement/pdf.

  • European Council. 2016b. Joint Way Forward on Migration Issues Between Afghanistan and the EU, 2 October. Available at https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eu_afghanistan_joint_way_forward_on_migration_issues.pdf.

  • European Court of Justice. 1979. Case 120/78, Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein. ECLI:EU:C:1979:42.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1981. Case 203/80, Criminal Proceedings Against Guerrino Casati. ECLI:EU:C:1981:261.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1991. Case C-76/90, Manfred Säger v Dennemeyer & Co. Ltd. ECLI:EU:C:1991:331.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1995a. Case C-55/94, Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano. ECLI:EU:C:1995:411.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1995b. C-415/93, Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL v Jean-Marc Bosman, Royal club liégeois SA v Jean-Marc Bosman and others and Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v Jean-Marc Bosman. ECLI:EU:C:1995:463.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1995c. Joined Cases C-163/94, 165/94 and 250/94, Criminal Proceedings Against Lucas Emilio Sanz de Lera, Raimundo Díaz Jiménez and Figen Kapanoglu. ECLI:EU:C:1995:451.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1998. Case C-85/96, María Martínez Sala v Freistaat Bayern. ECLI:EU:C:1998:217.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 1999. Case C-356/98, Arben Kaba v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Opinion of AG La Pergola. ECLI:EU:C:1999:470.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2001. Case C-184/99, Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d’aide sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve. ECLI:EU:C:2001:458.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2002. Case C-413/99, Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department. ECLI:EU:C:2002:493.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2003. Case C-413/01, Franca Ninni-Orasche v Bundesminister für Wissenschaft, Verkehr und Kunst. ECLI:EU:C:2003:600.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2004a. Case C-200/02, Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department. ECLI:EU:C:2004:639.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2004b. Case C-456/02, Michel Trojani v Centre public d’aide sociale de Bruxelles (CPAS). ECLI:EU:C:2004:488.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2004c. C-138/02, Brian Francis Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. ECLI:EU:C:2004:172.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2005a. Case C-209/03, The Queen, on the Application of Dany Bidar v London Borough of Ealing and Secretary of State for Education and Skills. ECLI:EU:C:2005:169.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2005b. Case C-258/04, Office national de l’emploi v Ioannis Ioannidis. ECLI:EU:C:2005:559.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2007a. Case C-438/05, International Transport Workers’ Federation and Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP and OÜ Viking Line Eesti. ECLI:EU:C:2007:772.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2007b. Case C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet, Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundets avdelning 1, Byggettan and Svenska Elektrikerförbundet. ECLI:EU:C:2007:809.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2008. Case C-346/06, Dirk Rüffert v Land Niedersachsen. ECLI:EU:C:2008:189.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2011. Case C-34/09, Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm). ECLI:EU:C:2011:124.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2013a. Case C-415/11, Mohamed Aziz v Caixa d´Estalvis de Catalunya, Tarragona i Manresa (Catalunyacaixa). ECLI:EU:C:2013:164.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2013b. Case C-86/12, Adzo Domenyo Alokpa and Others v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration. ECLI:EU:C:2013:645.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. 2014. C-62/14, Peter Gauweiler and Others v Deutscher Bundestag, ECLI:EU:C:2015:400 (Court). ECLI:EU:C:2015:7 (Opinion of the Advocate General).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. 2018. Treaties and the European Parliament. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties.

  • European Union. 2003a. Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 on Taxation of Savings Income in the Form of Interest Payments. OJ L 157, 26.6.2003, 38–48. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/48/oj.

  • European Union. 2003b. Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 Concerning the Status of Third-Country Nationals Who Are Long-Term Residents. OJ L 16, 23.1.2004, 44/53. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/109/oj.

  • European Union. 2004. Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the Right of Citizens of the Union and Their Family Members to Move and Reside Freely Within the Territory of the Member States Amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1612/68 and Repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC. DO L 158, 30.4.2004, 77/123. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2004/38/oj.

  • European Union. 2009. Council Directive 2009/50/EC of 25 May 2009 on the Conditions of Entry and Residence of Third-Country Nationals for the Purposes of Highly Qualified Employment. OJ L 155, 18.6.2009, 17/29. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/50/oj.

  • European Union. 2010. Regulation (EU) No. 1092/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on European Union Macro-Prudential Oversight of the Financial System and Establishing a European Systemic Risk Board. OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, 1–11. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1092/oj.

  • European Union. 2011. Directive 2011/98/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on a Single Application Procedure for a Single Permit for Third-Country Nationals to Reside and Work in the Territory of a Member State and on a Common Set of Rights for Third-Country Workers Legally Residing in a Member State. OJ L 343 of 23.12.2011, 1/9. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/98/oj.

  • European Union. 2013. Council Regulation (EU) No. 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 Conferring Specific Tasks on the European Central Bank Concerning Policies Relating to the Prudential Supervision of Credit Institutions. OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, 63–89. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1024/oj.

  • European Union. 2014a. Directive 2014/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the Conditions of Entry and Stay of Third-Country Nationals for the Purpose of Employment as Seasonal Workers. OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, 375–390. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/36/oj.

  • European Union. 2014b. Regulation (EU) No. 468/2014 of the European Central Bank of 16 April 2014 Establishing the Framework for Cooperation Within the Single Supervisory Mechanism Between the European Central Bank and National Competent Authorities and with National Designated Authorities (SSM Framework Regulation) (ECB/2014/17). OJ L 141, 14.5.2014, 1–50. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/468/oj.

  • European Union. 2014c. Council Directive 2014/107/EU of 9 December 2014 Amending Directive 2011/16/EU as Regards Mandatory Automatic Exchange of Information in the Field of Taxation. OJ L 359, 16.12.2014, 1–29. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/107/oj.

  • European Union. 2015. Council Decision (EU) 2015/1601 of 22 September 2015 Establishing Provisional Measures in the Area of International Protection for the Benefit of Italy and Greece. OJ L 248, 24.09.2015, 80–94. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2015/1601/oj.

  • European Union. 2016. Directive (EU) 2016/801 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the Conditions of Entry and Residence of Third-Country Nationals for the Purposes of Research, Studies, Training, Voluntary Service, Pupil Exchange Schemes or Educational Projects and au Pairing. OJ L 132, 21.5.2016, 21–57. ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/801/oj.

  • Farrell, Henry, and Adrienne Héritier. 2003. The Invisible Transformation of Codecision: Problems of Democratic Legitimacy. Sieps Report No. 7, Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. Available at http://www.sieps.se/en/publications/2003/the-invisible-transformation-of-codecision-problems-of-democratic-legitimacy-20037/Sieps_2003_7.pdf.

  • Farrell, Henry, and Adrienne Héritier. 2004. Interorganizational Negotiation and Intraorganizational Power in Shared Decision Making: Early Agreements Under Co-decision and Their Impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies 37: 1184–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004269833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, Judy, and Petra Herzfeld Olsson. 2014. The EU Seasonal Workers Directive: When Immigration Controls Meet Labour Rights. European Journal of Migration and Law 16: 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galpin, Charlotte, and Hans Jörg Trenz. 2018. Rethinking First- and Second-Order Elections Media Negativity and Polity Contestation During the 2014 European Parliament Elections in Germany and the UK. ARENA Working Paper 3/2018. Available at https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2018/wp-3-18.pdf.

  • Geddes, Andrew. 1995. Immigrant and Ethnic Minorities and the EU’s “Democratic Deficit”. Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00527.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Andrew, and Peter Scholten. 2016. The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geithner, Timothy. 2014. Stress Tests: Reflections on the Financial Crises. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Constitutional Court. 1993. Ruling on the Maastricht Treaty, 2 BvR 2134/92, 2 BvR 2159/92, BVerfGE 89, 155. English translation available at http://www.proyectos.cchs.csic.es/euroconstitution/library/Brunner_Sentence.pdf.

  • Gerstenberg, Oliver. 2001. Denationalization and the Very Idea of Democratic Constitutionalism: The Case of the European Community. Ratio Juris 14: 298–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsborg, Paul. 2003. Italy and Its Discontents: Family, Civil Society, State. Palgrave: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giubboni, Stefano. 2018. The Rise and Fall of EU Labour Law. European Law Journal 24: 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granell, Francisco. 1995. The European Union’s Enlargement Negotiations with Austria, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Journal of Common Market Studies 33: 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00520.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Citizenship and National Identity. In Between Facts and Norms, Jürgen Habermas, 491–515. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Why Europe Needs a Constitution. New Left Review 11 (new series): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Peo. 2009. Post-national Europe—Without Cosmopolitan Guarantees. Race & Class 50: 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396809102994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Peo, and Sandy Brian Hager. 2012. The Politics of European Citizenship: Deepening Contradictions in Social Rights and Migration Policy. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Hermann. 2000. Political Democracy and Social Homogeneity. In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, ed. Arthur J. Jacobson and Bernhard Schlink, 256–265. Berkeley: California University Press. Originally published in German in 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockenos, Paul. 1994. Free to Hate: The Rise of the Right in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, Cathrine. 2012. What Is Epistocracy? In Sacred Science?, ed. S.A. Øyen, T. Lund-Olsen, and N.S. Vaage, 41–54. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemoto, Daisuke. 2016. Re-examining the Removal of Exchange Control by the Thatcher Government in 1979. Conference Paper. Available at https://tinyurl.com/z4n95ss.

  • Iliopoulou, Anastasia, and Helen Toner. 2002. Case C-184/99, Rudy Grzelczyk v. Centre Public d’Aide Sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve. Common Market Law Review 39: 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irish Republic. 2008. Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008. Available at http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/acts/2008/a1808.pdf.

  • Joerges, Christian. 2015. The Legitimacy Problématique of Economic Governance in the EU. In The Governance Report 2015, ed. Mark Dawson, Henrik Enderlein, and Christian Joerges, 69–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Christian, and Florian Rödl. 2009. Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the ‘Social Deficit’ of European Integration: Reflections After the Judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval. European Law Journal 15: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00448.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, Christian, Yves Mény, and J.H.H. Weiler. 2001. Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance. Jean Monnet Programme, Working Papers, 01/2001. Available at https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/01/010601.html.

  • Judt, Tony. 2005. Postwar: A History of Europe Since 1945. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasparek, Bernd. 2016. Complementing Schengen: The Dublin System and the European Border and Migration Regime. In Migration Policy and Practice. Interventions and Solutions, ed. Harald Bauder and Christian Matheis, 59–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochenov, Dimitry. 2009. Ius Tractum of Many Faces: European Citizenship and the Difficult Relationship Between Status and Rights. Columbia Journal of European Law 15: 169–237. http://cjel.law.columbia.edu/print/2016/ius-tractum-of-many-faces-european-citizenship-and-the-difficult-relationship-between-status-and-rights/.

  • Kochenov, Dimitry. 2011. A Real European Citizenship; A New Jurisdiction Test; A Novel Chapter in the Development of the Union in Europe. Columbia Journal of European Law 18: 56–109. http://cjel.law.columbia.edu/print/2016/a-real-european-citizenship-a-new-jurisdiction-test-a-novel-chapter-in-the-development-of-the-union-in-europe/.

  • Kochenov, Dimitry. 2013. The Essence of EU Citizenship Emerging from the Last Ten Years of Academic Debate: Beyond the Cherry Blossoms and the Moon? International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62: 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589312000589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostakopoulou, Dora. 2001. Citizenship, Identity and Immigration in the European Union: Between Past and Future. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukovec, Damjan. 2015. Law and the Periphery. European Law Journal 21: 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutay, Acar. 2015. Limits of Participatory Democracy in European Governance. European Law Journal 21: 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapavitsas, Costas. 2018. The Left Case Against the EU. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Torre, Massimo. 1995. Citizenship: A European Wager. Ratio Juris 8: 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1995.tb00202.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Torre, Massimo (ed.). 1998. European Citizenship: An Institutional Challenge. Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Flora. 1976. Birth of the European Citizen. European Community 176: 3–6. Available at http://aei.pitt.edu/44027/1/A7581.pdf.

  • Losada, Fernando, and Agustín José Menéndez (eds.). 2014. The Key Legal Texts of the European Crises. Available at http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/publications-2014/menendez-losada-legal-texts-v01-120614.pdf.

  • Margiotta, Costanza. 2014. Cittadinanza europea. Istruzioni per l’uso. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquand, David. 1979. Parliament for Europe. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Barbara. 2000. The New Germany and Migration in Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, Elizabeth. 1993. Citizenship and the European Community. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, Agustín José. 2013. The Existential Crisis of the European Union. German Law Journal 14: 453–526. https://tinyurl.com/j2xn2bu.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, Agustín José. 2015. Constitución o camisa de fuerza? De las nuevas reglas fiscales al “Estado amortizador”. Teoria Politica 5: 189–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, Agustín José. 2016. The Refugee Crisis: Between Human Tragedy and Symptom of the Structural Crisis of European Integration. European Law Journal 22: 388–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, Agustín José. 2017a. The Crisis of Law and the European Crises: From the Social and Democratic Rechtsstaat to the Consolidating State of (Pseudo-)Technocratic Governance. Journal of Law and Society 44: 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, Agustín José. 2017b. The Guardianship of European Constitutionality: A Structural Critique of European Constitutional Review. In The Reach of Free Movement, ed. Mads Andenas, Tarjei Bekkedal, and Luca Pantaleo, 173–203. The Hague: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niglia, Leone. 2016. Eclipse of the Constitution {Europe Nouveau Siècle}. European Law Journal 22: 132–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Charlotte. 2016. Civis Capitalist Sum: Class as the New Guiding Principle of EU Free Movement Rights. Common Market Law Review 53 (4): 937–977. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2016089.

  • O’Keefe, David. 1994. Union Citizenship. In Legal Issues of the Maastricht Treaty, ed. David O’Keefe and Patrick Twomey, 87–107. London: Chancery Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, Siofra. 1996. The Evolving Concept of Community Citizenship: From the Free Movement of Persons to Union Citizenship. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Espen D.H. 2012. Transnational Citizenship in the European Union: Past, Present and Future. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Espen D.H. 2013. European Citizenship: Mixing Nation-State and Federal Features with a Cosmopolitan Twist. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14: 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2013.772750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patjin, Schelto. 1976. Introduction. In Elections to the European Parliament by Direct Universal Suffrage, 7–8. Brussels: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaux, Cristophe. 2012. L’Ètat Social: Pour sortir du chaos neoliberal. Paris: Mille et Une Nuits.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, Anne. 2011. Early Conclusion in Bicameral Bargaining: Evidence from the Co-decision Legislative Procedure of the European Union. European Union Politics 12: 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510388675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raucea, Chiara. 2016. European Citizenship and the Right to Reside: ‘No One on the Outside Has a Right to Be Inside?’. European Law Journal 22: 470–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Norbert. 2008. Free Movement v. Social Rights in an Enlarged Union: The Laval and Viking Cases Before the European Court of Justice. German Law Journal 9: 125–160. https://tinyurl.com/yb2fngh7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif, Karl Heinz, and Hermann Schmitt. 1980. Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Elections Results. European Journal of Political Research 8: 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repubblica Italiana. 2017. Memorandum d’intesa sulla cooperazione nel campo dello sviluppo, del contrasto all’immigrazione illegale, al traffico di esseri umani, al contrabando e sul rafforzamento della sicurezza delle frontiere tra lo Stato della Libia e la Repubblica Italiana, 2 February. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2017/feb/it-libya-memo-immigration-border-security-2-2-17.pdf.

  • Roger, Eatwell, and Matthew Goodwin. 2018. National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. Hardmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samers, Michael. 2004. An Emerging Geopolitics of “Illegal” Immigration in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law 6: 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1163/1571816041518750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saydé, Alexandre. 2011. One Law Two Competitions: An Enquiry into the Contradictions of Free Movement Law. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 13: 365–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciarra, Silvana. 2008. Viking and Laval: Collective Labour Rights and Market Freedoms in the Enlarged EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 10: 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1528887000001440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scicluna, Nicole. 2017. Integration Through the Disintegration of Law? The ECB and EU Constitutionalism in the Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 12: 1874–1891. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1362026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Jo. 2007. The Transformation of Citizenship in the European Union: Electoral Rights and the Restructuring of Political Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Rogers. 2003. Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Memberships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spanish Government. 1990. Letter to the Irish Presidency. Agence Europe, Documents, No. 5252, May 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stie, Anne Elizabeth. 2012. Democratic Decision-Making in the EU: Technocracy in Disguise? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strudel, Sylvie. 2003. Polyrythmie européenne: le droit de suffrage municipal des étrangers au sein de l’Union, une règle électorale entre détournements et retardements. Revue française de science politique 53: 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strumia, Francesca. 2016. European Citizenship and EU Immigration: A Demoi-cratic Bridge Between the Third Country Nationals’ Right to Belong and the Member States’ Power to Exclude. European Law Journal 22: 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooze, Adam. 2018. Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troper, Michel. 2003. The Logic of Justification of Judicial Review. I.CON 1: 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.1.99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuori, Klaus. 2016. Has Euro Area Monetary Policy Become Redistribution by Monetary Means? ‘Unconventional’ Monetary Policy as a Hidden Transfer Mechanism. European Law Journal 22: 838–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bogdandy, Armin, Matthias Kottmann, Carlino Antpohler, Johanna Dickschen, Simon Hentrei, and Maja Smokolj. 2012. Reverse Solange—Protecting the Essence of Fundamental Rights Against EU Member States. Common Market Law Review 49: 489–520. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2012018.

  • Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society, ed. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1994. Political Writings, ed. Peter Lassman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H.H. 1999. The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Jonathan. 2015. Emergency Europe. Political Studies 63: 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje. 1998. ‘European’ Citizenship Practice: Building Institutions of a Non-state. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Ross. 2000. Democratic Distributive Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agustín José Menéndez .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Menéndez, A.J., Olsen, E.D.H. (2020). European Citizenship: Between Formal Status and Practice. In: Challenging European Citizenship. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22281-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics