Skip to main content

A Comparison of Two Historical Trader Societies – An Agent-Based Simulation Study of English East India Company and New-Julfa

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XIX (MABS 2018)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the English East India Company (EIC) and Armenian traders of New-Julfa (Julfa) that were active during 17th and 18th centuries. Both were successful trading cooperatives that relied on different institutional parameters and mechanisms to coordinate their activities. In this work, we explore a selection of those aspects (five of them): (a) societal mortality rate, (b) nature of the system in attracting workforce (open vs. close), (c) existence of adjudication process, (d) payment scheme, and (e) punishment. To study effects of these attributes on system behaviour, we systematically modify these attributes to create a total of 10 hypothetical systems, two of which mirror characteristics of the EIC and Julfa systems. By doing these modifications, we study which of these systems are successful in improving system performance in terms of (a) identifying cheaters, (b) improving trading skills of agents, (c) making more profit for the organisation, and (d) deterring agents from cheating. A central insight of the simulation was the impact of substantial profit sharing on trader cooperation (i.e. more profit sharing resulted in lowered cheating). Moreover, our results show that Julfa had a lower number of cheaters despite having an open workforce to attract employees, thus making it more profitable and robust to changes in workforce characteristics (i.e. using an open workforce society).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \( \pounds 5 \) to \( \pounds 40 \) versus \( \pounds 50 \) in Britain.

  2. 2.

    Around \( \pounds 1000 \) see Tables 1–3 of [11].

  3. 3.

    The most frequent reported cheats include embezzlement, making up Indian names to sell own items, accepting gift from brokers, i.e. choosing best gift giver or parties that work in private trades to increase bargain power for own benefits [15].

  4. 4.

    For a list of these factories in India see [19], Map 2 (p. 65).

  5. 5.

    A detailed table is provided in [4], Table A.26 (p. 440).

  6. 6.

    EIC legalised local trades for agents in late 17th and early 18th AD and Julfans were active for less than 200 years.

References

  1. Adams, J.S.: Inequity in social exchange. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2, 267–299 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aslanian, S.D.: From the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean: Circulation and the Global Trade Networks of Armenian Merchants from New Julfa/Isfahan, 1605–1747. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaudhuri, K.N.: The English East India Company: The Study of an Early Joint-stock Company 1600–1640. Frank Cass & Co Ltd., London (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaudhuri, K.N.: The Trading World of Asia and the English East India Company: 1660–1760. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Erikson, E.: Between Monopoly and Free Trade: The English East India Company, 1600–1757. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Frantz, C., Purvis, M.K., Nowostawski, M.: Agent-based modeling of information transmission in early historic trading. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 32(3), 393–416 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frolkis, V.V.: Experimental life prolongation. In: Frolkis, V.V. (ed.) Aging and Life-Prolonging Processes, pp. 306–340. Springer, Vienna (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8649-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Greif, A.: Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders’ coalition. The American economic review 83, 525–548 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haubrich, J.G.: Risk aversion, performance pay, and the principal-agent problem. J. Polit. Econ. 102(2), 258–276 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hejeebu, S.: Microeconomic investigations of the English East India Company. Ph.D. thesis, University of Iowa (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hejeebu, S.: Contract enforcement in the English East India Company. J. Econ. Hist. 65(2), 496–523 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herzig, E.M.: The Armenian Merchants of New Julfa, Isfahan: A study in pre-modern Asian trade. Ph.D. thesis, D. Phil., Oxford (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hollingsworth, T.H.: A demographic study of the British ducal families. Popul. Stud. 11(1), 4–26 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Holmstrom, B., Milgrom, P.: Multitask principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econ. Organ. 7, 24–52 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall, P.J.: East Indian Fortunes: The British in Bengal in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Myerson, R.B.: Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal-agent problems. J. Math. Econ. 10(1), 67–81 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. North, D.C.: Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Plato, Jowett, B.: Apology. public domain. Champaign, Ill : Project Gutenberg. (nd)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robins, N.: The Corporation that Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational. Pluto Press, Chicago (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seth, V.K.: The East India Company-a case study in corporate governance. Glob. Bus. Rev. 13(2), 221–238 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Hosein Afshar Sedigh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sedigh, A.H.A., Frantz, C.K., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Purvis, M.K., Purvis, M.A. (2019). A Comparison of Two Historical Trader Societies – An Agent-Based Simulation Study of English East India Company and New-Julfa. In: Davidsson, P., Verhagen, H. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation XIX. MABS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22270-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22270-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22269-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22270-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics