Advertisement

Towards Predicting Attention and Workload During Math Problem Solving

  • Ange TatoEmail author
  • Roger Nkambou
  • Ramla Ghali
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11528)

Abstract

Gifted students are characterized by a low level of attention and workload. Thus, it is very important to detect the variation of these values in real time when children are solving problems. A low value of workload or attention could be an indicator that the child is gifted. In this paper, we conducted a preliminary study in order to detect when children have a low values of attention or workload. A sample of 17 pupils participated in this study by solving math problems in an environment called Netmath. The EEG signal data collected from the experiment was used to train a Long Short Term Memory network (LSTM) to predict two mental states (attention and workload) in real time, when solving math problem. First results show that it is possible to predict these values in real time and the accuracy of the prediction is slightly above the random model. This pilot research provide some insight to the hypothesis that we can predict those variables in real time, which might be useful to intelligent tutor and to detect gifted children.

Keywords

Electroencephalography (EEG) prediction LSTM Attention Workload 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thanks The Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies (FRQNT) for their financial support and Beam Me Up Games.

References

  1. 1.
    Beal, C.R., Galan, F.C.: EEG estimates of cognitive workload and engagement predict math problem solving outcomes. Soc. Res. Educ. Eff. Consultado el, 05/17/19 (2012). http://eric.ed.gov/?q=EEG&id=ED536318
  2. 2.
    Berka, C., et al.: Real-time analysis of EEG indexes of alertness, cognition, and memory acquired with a wireless EEG headset. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 17(2), 151–170 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Besserve, M., Philippe, M., Florence, G., Laurent, F., Garnero, L., Martinerie, J.: Prediction of performance level during a cognitive task from ongoing EEG oscillatory activities. Clin. Neurophysiol. 119(4), 897–908 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang, K.M., Nelson, J., Pant, U., Mostow, J.: Toward exploiting EEG input in a reading tutor. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 22(1–2), 19–38 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaouachi, M., Jraidi, I., Frasson, C.: Adapting to learners’ mental states using a physiological computing approach. In: FLAIRS Conference, pp. 257–262 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, G.A., Rimm, S.B.: Education of the Gifted and Talented. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghali, R., Abdessalem, H.B., Frasson, C., Nkambou, R.: Identifying brain characteristics of bright students. J. Intell. Learn. Syst. Appl. 10(03), 93 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murdoch, W.J., Szlam, A.: Automatic rule extraction from long short term memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.02540 (2017)
  10. 10.
    Renzulli, J.S.: The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model for Promoting Creative Productivity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sternberg, R.J.: Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sternberg, R.J., Jarvin, L., Grigorenko, E.L.: Explorations in Giftedness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tai, K.S., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.00075 (2015)
  14. 14.
    Terman, L.M., Baldwin, B.T., Bronson, E., De Voss, J.C.: Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children, vol. 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1926)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, K., et al.: Show, attend and tell: neural image caption generation with visual attention. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2048–2057 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I.: Learning to execute. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.4615 (2014)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations